HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Buffet: Sen. Warren More ...

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:00 PM

Buffet: Sen. Warren More Effective If She Was 'Less Angry' (VIDEO)

Source: TPM

Billionaire and Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett argued Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) would be more effective in her fight to remove Wall Street influence from the halls of Congress if she wasn't so angry.

Buffet made the comments in an interview with Andrew Ross Sorkin on CNBC's Squawk Box. Sorkin first asked Buffett what he thought of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) but Buffett declined to weigh in. Then Sorkin asked about Warren and her views of Wall Street. Warren's signature issue is uprooting Wall Street influence from the halls of Congress. She's at times even gone against her own party over Treasury Department appointments.

"Well, I think she would be better if she was less angry and demonized less," Buffet said. "I mean, I believe in hate the sin and love the sinner. And I also believe in praising by name, and criticizing by category. And I'm not sure I've totally convinced Warren that's the way to go." Squawk Box co-host Becky Quick began to move to the conversation to a different question but Sorkin pressed Buffett if he'd tried to convince her.

"No, no, no and, listen, I don't pick her out. There's plenty of the other candidates that their styles are not one hundred percent my style, but I do think it's a mistake to get angry with your with people who disagree with you," Buffett said. "I mean, in the end we do have to work together. I mean, I think the whole nature of governing is particularly when you've got a divided government like we have now, is that you end up with bills that each side doesn't like but they like it better than doing nothing."

-snip-

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/warren-buffet-elizabeth-warren-less-angry



Video @ link, above

55 replies, 6182 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 55 replies Author Time Post
Reply Buffet: Sen. Warren More Effective If She Was 'Less Angry' (VIDEO) (Original post)
DonViejo Mar 2015 OP
americannightmare Mar 2015 #1
earthside Mar 2015 #2
jwirr Mar 2015 #26
niyad Mar 2015 #3
misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #6
niyad Mar 2015 #9
misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #14
Jefferson23 Mar 2015 #4
SoLeftIAmRight Mar 2015 #5
OperationAvarice Mar 2015 #7
DocMac Mar 2015 #32
Sheelanagig Mar 2015 #8
LovingA2andMI Mar 2015 #49
Sheelanagig Mar 2015 #53
GoneFishin Mar 2015 #10
William Seger Mar 2015 #40
GoneFishin Mar 2015 #50
old guy Mar 2015 #11
sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #12
nolabels Mar 2015 #19
irisblue Mar 2015 #13
wolfie001 Mar 2015 #15
misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #16
Dems to Win Mar 2015 #17
William769 Mar 2015 #18
Geronimoe Mar 2015 #20
DallasNE Mar 2015 #21
McCamy Taylor Mar 2015 #22
misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #25
misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #27
niyad Mar 2015 #54
gregcrawford Mar 2015 #23
jomin41 Mar 2015 #24
Android3.14 Mar 2015 #28
Justice Mar 2015 #31
djean111 Mar 2015 #29
JDPriestly Mar 2015 #30
DocMac Mar 2015 #34
LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #36
jomin41 Mar 2015 #43
Brigid Mar 2015 #33
PoliticAverse Mar 2015 #35
JDPriestly Mar 2015 #47
n2doc Mar 2015 #37
INdemo Mar 2015 #38
aquart Mar 2015 #51
mmonk Mar 2015 #39
Cynic13 Mar 2015 #41
Hestia Mar 2015 #42
kacekwl Mar 2015 #44
graegoyle Mar 2015 #45
blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #46
4dsc Mar 2015 #48
UpInArms Mar 2015 #52
yurbud Mar 2015 #55

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:04 PM

1. Oh boy, here we go again...

the fact that anybody is listening to Buffet regarding politics is proof positive that the system is broken. Do I have to mention the part about 'If she were a man...' - oops, my bad...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:06 PM

2. The rich and powerful ...

... the political establishment-types find her tone 'angry'.

The rest of us average, struggling Americans find her tone hopeful.

Get it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to earthside (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:25 PM

26. And I think that is what he is saying. That she could reach them easier if she was not so angry. I

am not sure that I agree with him. The President talks softly and they pay not attention to him either. What Wall street needs to see from Elizabeth is just how angry WE are. No one else gives them that view.

IMO the banks and corporations and their owners/CEOs are to blame for 99% of our problems. And they do not even understand why. They need to listen to Elizabeth - she knows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:07 PM

3. "if you aren't angry, you aren't paying attention" SHUT UP, warren. you would NOT be

talking about "anger" if sen. warren were a man.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to niyad (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:13 PM

6. why are powerful bright women told to shut up & sit down?

And have vaginal untrasounds via skype?
Stupid old coots need to move out of the way cuz this 2016 will be the year sensibility returns to this Nation.
Enough is enough.
To silence them will only make them grow in power & mass.
There IS no ceiling!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to misterhighwasted (Reply #6)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:21 PM

9. because powerful, bright women scare the socks of those who know this system sucks,

and are deathly afraid of what will happen when all those powerful, bright, angry women take over.

payback is a b****

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to niyad (Reply #9)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:30 PM

14. Indeed. What a stupid thing for Buffet to say.

Their mothers must have beat them with sticks to create such cowering fear.
And their fear of a female voice that points out the error of their ways.
Clearly they learned nothing by it.
Another kind of beating is coming for the smarmy little a***oles in 2016.
About effin time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:10 PM

4. BULLSHIT. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:12 PM

5. I am as mad as hell...

 

The time to play nice is long gone. The fight is against ruthless monsters.

Buffet has the means to change the world but where is the profit in that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:14 PM

7. I don't trust billionaires anyway.

 

Doesn't want to talk about Cruz, then hits Warren with a less angry and less demonize quote; this is from the man that said "I should pay more taxes" instead of "I did pay more taxes." I knew he was just as bad as the rest of the 1 percenters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OperationAvarice (Reply #7)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:42 PM

32. I'm with you, my friend.

Welcome to DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:18 PM

8. Put a sock in it, old rich white man

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheelanagig (Reply #8)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 01:52 AM

49. Welcome to DU...

Loving the "Shut Up, Rich Old White Man" reply. Hope you enjoy the DU ride!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LovingA2andMI (Reply #49)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 01:30 PM

53. Thank you on both counts!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:22 PM

10. Screw him. Good manners don't accomplish shit against greedy, self-entitled, arrogant sociopaths.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoneFishin (Reply #10)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 04:40 PM

40. ... except encourage them to double-down if they sense weakness.

Buffet seems to be unaware that Obama already tried that strategy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to William Seger (Reply #40)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:21 AM

50. Yep. Nice people reciprocate when treated nicely. But another breed exists who just see that as

weakness and they go in for the kill. It's best to be kind to those who deserve it. But these guys only understand 2x4s on the side of the head.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:24 PM

11. I have a lot of things to say about this

but I don't want to appear angry. I'll just say that Mr. Buffet is wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:25 PM

12. Well,well Buffet and H.Dean on the same side.

How delightful to see the Third Way trying to
dismiss her as too angry.

That means that Warren touches the correct nerve;,
or should I say the right nerve?

Don't tell me that Howard Dean in his support
for HRC is not supporting the Third Way; of
course they both are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sadoldgirl (Reply #12)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:52 PM

19. First they notice you, then...........

they hate you, then..........

They don't call them reactionaries for nothing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:26 PM

13. I am surprised he is misogynist

Telling a powerful, articulate, elected US Senator to be "Less angry" who is female makes me wonder how tight he cups himself when he speaks to her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:34 PM

15. Pretends to be nice.....

.....hates workers. He can go straight to hell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:34 PM

16. And in two days we'll have a statement as to what he "really" meant to say

Condescending senile old s.o.b.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:36 PM

17. Buffet's Geico tries to get accident victims to sign DNR orders to make Buffet more money

 

That's what Buffet calls 'all working together' [on edit: DNR = Do Not Resuscitate]

Screw Buffet and his toxic, sociopathic greed. He should be recognized as the sick, sick bastard he is and put into a mental hospital alongside the Kochs.

Run, Liz, Run!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:51 PM

18. Happy to be the first to recommend this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:52 PM

20. Train wreck

 

Perhaps instead Buffet could use some of his billions of dollars to fix the track his trains carrying oil use so they don't derail and wipe out a city. Just use a little of the profits Moody made off of selling ratings that led to 2008 global melt down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:00 PM

21. Yes And No

Not a very nuanced response from Warren Buffett here. He seems to be talking end game but we are no where near that point. People have been trying it Buffett's way for some time and not getting any results. That tells us one thing. Passion is missing and that is what Warren brings - not anger. Getting the base involved is critical and that is where Warren is at right now. You go girl!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:05 PM

22. My sexism meter just went through the roof.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to McCamy Taylor (Reply #22)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:20 PM

25. Yup I hear you. Reaching the tipping point

March 18th. March for women.
(Cant link from my phone, try to find the post another DUer made earlier about this event.)

Timing couldn't be better.
I am so fed up with this!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to misterhighwasted (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:25 PM

27. HERE: Women's Rights & Issues Group..Post by Niyad today.

MARCH 18.
Sorry we have to STILL DO THIS!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:10 PM

23. Mr. Buffett...

... permit me to suggest that it is YOU who is not angry ENOUGH. But then, being a .0001 percenter, you've got a dog in this fight, so it serves your interests to demean Ms. Warren's position, and her emphatic delivery of her message.

Anyone with the brains of a potted plant should be apoplectic with rage at the depredations of the Weasels of Wall Street and the over-privileged assholes who waste money on gold-plated toilets and think they're better than those of us who haven't got a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of.

The treacherous liars and thieves who whine that they're "doing God's work," or are "under assault," WILL be held to account for their crimes, make no mistake. And it is only through the eloquent outrage of people like Elizabeth Warren that the general populace can learn what these evil bastards are REALLY up to.

So, Warren, ol' buddy, you ain't seen "ANGRY" yet, but boy, Howdy, you better believe you're going to!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:13 PM

24. mister billionaire Buffett

can kiss my angry ass. When's the last time he had to worry about his next meal? Screw him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:26 PM

28. At the risk of promoting another stereotype

 

Mr. Buffett just showed his age.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Android3.14 (Reply #28)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:40 PM

31. YES ONE THOUSAND TIMES YES

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:29 PM

29. Oh, my! Meme of the day - Warren should just STFU. From Dems!

 

Warren could not say another word, and I would still hate the Third Way neo-liberal Centrists.
Barn door is open. Tough shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:37 PM

30. Warren Buffet has access.

If he calls an aide to a member of Congress, you better believe that aide is going to tell the Congressman that Warren Buffet called. And in some instances, I bet you the congressman will try to call Warren Buffet back.

That is why Warren Buffet does not understand that it is Elizabeth Warren's ability to express the anger of millions of Americans that endears her to us. He doesn't have to speak loudly when he wants to express himself. Congress falls all over itself to hear what he has to say.

I know my representative to Congress. He is a great guy and much more accessible to his constituents than others in Congress. He listens to everyone and appears to care about us. But when I call his office, his staff does not say to the Congressman, "Guess who called." And I can't afford to donate to his campaign, and I would not be able to pay big money for a plate a dinner held in his honor even though I like him very much.

Warren Buffet could donate or pay for a dinner. Every member of Congress knows that. That's why he has access. It isn't the brilliance of his personality. It isn't his understanding of the law, especially not of bankruptcy law. It isn't because he has researched the economic dilemmas of the average American family. Warren Buffet has access because he is rich. It's not his personality. He is simply rich. And that buys access.

So Warren Buffet does not have to get angry just to get a hearing for his views.

We little people who have little money do. We have to do something outrageous like Code Pink or big like huge demonstrations, or something spectacular to get a little attention. And even then, we can't begin to get the huge amount of attention that the rich and very rich get from Congress.

So, Mr. Buffet, I realize that you are not the worst person. You are sensible. You are down-to-earth. But sometimes being loud and angry is necessary and good for the country.

Teddy Roosevelt had asthma, and yet he talked as loud and fast as he could. He wasn't the most liberal person really. In fact he was rather conservative in many respects. But he wanted to clean up the corruption of his time. And he did it by screaming over the loud noise that the changing of money in the halls of our government creates. And with his torrent of words, his brilliant use of image and language and his courage and yes, his anger, he went a long way toward cleaning up the horrible corruption of his time.

When I see and hear Elizabeth Warren, I see and hear the energy and conviction and determination that Teddy Roosevelt had. That's what we need right now.

Corruption in government is now called "privatization." Jobs (contracts) that should be done by modestly paid civil servants are now done by "private contractors" for big salaries. Corruption by any name is corruption. Mr. Buffet, you profit from some of that corruption, I'm sure. It's no wonder that Elizabeth Warren's courage and determination make you feel uncomfortable.

Yes. Wall Street profits, and therefore you, profit from that corruption. And in gratitude for the dirty money they and you take from taxpayers, Wall Streeters (including the bankers) nearly destroyed the world's economy. In fact, the damage from their great war against normal, law-abiding wage-earners around the world is still destroying economies of small countries to say nothing of families in the US.

This year (next fall) marks seven years from the year that the Bush administration went to Congress to beg for money to bail out the banks.

Families lost their homes. Well they couldn't afford them anyway you say, Mr. Buffet.

But remember, losing their homes was just the first step. In some states and in California if they had been lured into taking on a second mortgage, the homeowners may have owed deficiency judgments. That is they theoretically did not discharge their mortgage debt just by giving up their home to a foreclosure. They ended up in bankruptcy court -- personal bankruptcy court.

Remember. The banks were bailed out. Homeowners were not.

Many homeowners ended up in bankruptcy for money they owed only because their houses were overvalued when they bought them and undervalued in the midst of the crisis when they lost them due to foreclosure and eviction. Mr. Buffet, homeowners deserved better treatment. In the great inflation in Germany in the 1920s, the courts rewrote the leases so that renters would not be evicted. We could have rewritten the mortgage contracts so that the losses that resulted from the excessive risks taken on by banks could have been shared among poor and rich, so that the poor, the hard-working middle classes, would not have suffered so much. I never heard you suggest such a solution. It would have worked, but the likes of you would not have made so much money off the financial misery of others, the disaster that the banks caused.

For those who were foreclosed and ended up in bankruptcy court, the long night of bad credit and of other things in their lives that went as the economy failed, joblessness or a lousy job, are still darkening their lives.

A Congressman or -woman who shows no mercy on the ****()() bankers and Walll Street pigs who put those people in the precarious positions they are in is a heroine. And there is only one. Elizabeth Warren.

I understand, Mr. Buffet, that you would rather not hear about or see the misery of those who are just starting to crawl out of their economic holes. You have a good reputation. You are a sensible guy. I'm sure that while your share of the Wall Street loot from the greatest theft in the past 70-some years by Wall Street's best and most readily exonerated is hefty, probably larger than even you realize, there are a lot of people suffering down here in the poorer levels of our society. I'm not directly one of them, but I sure seem to know a lot of them.

Mr. Buffet, you should be ashamed. You should get out and talk to the people who lost their homes, their small businesses, their dreams.

Sometimes there is a place for a loud, angry voice. Elizabeth Warren is a medium-sized woman with a very efficient, large brain, a small voice and a lot of energy. We need more of her. We need her in the White House.

A lot of rich, influential people did not like Teddy Roosevelt either. And he got into the White House by fluke and by good luck for the American people.

Warren Buffet, you've had your turn at making a fortune via a sick, monstrous system. Sit down and let someone who understands the pain of people trying to make a living in a healthy, honest way in that sick system.

Mr. Buffet, you can get on TV and opine whenever you want. Now let Elizabeth Warren speak for the rest of us. You've had your say. Shut up, enjoy your money and try to listen for once with our ears.

Let Elizabeth Warren speak for the rest of us without your criticism. Time that you and the rest of the overly rich in America listen silently to the pain of the people and accept the fact that we need change that brings opportunity for all of us, not just for rich guys like you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:53 PM

34. + 500 trillion. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 03:36 PM

36. "I see and hear the energy and conviction and determination"

Well said JDPriestly
That statement is how I'd describe Ms. Warren. Angry? Of course she is, as many of us are, angry about a lot of issues where we are not being heard. It is under the surface. But Mr. Buffet uses it like he is describing someone who can't control their feelings and is permanently agitated and by implication a distracted hot-headed individual.

Its surprising coming from him. I've seen it used on Fox News before. The right wing standard is to either actually be angry or fake anger to talk over any guest that may be opposed to their agenda, to cow them into only getting out a few lines that are pounced on immediately with raised voice. Then if this more liberal guest fights back and keeps talking over their gasps and interjections and gets a good statement in, the host pastes on a smarmy smile and tells them....geez...don't get so angry! The Angry Left etc..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JDPriestly (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:33 PM

43. Thank You for expressing

what my anger gets in the way of.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 02:46 PM

33. Dear Mr. Buffett:

Please take a moment to read my sig line. Then kiss my little white misbehaving Scots-Irish butt.

Love,
Brigid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to PoliticAverse (Reply #35)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 08:23 PM

47. Of course. Hillary represents his interests to the detriment of the rest of us.

We need some balance in our economy that does not shove the losses of the risks of our financial institutions and investors onto the middle class and the poor. Right now, and since Reagan at the very least, the wealthy get to take risks, and when they miscalculate and lose, they expect the rest of us to tighten our belts while they get bailed out.

That makes for a lot of problems, and Elizabeth Warren's perceived anger is the least of them.

Hillary's subservience to wealth and influence is going to engender far more anger than Warren's statements which illuminate the heart and soul of the problem: the fact that if I take a risk and lose, my losses are my problem. In fact, if my boss or my state or someone else takes a risk and loses, it's my problem. I may lose my job or not get a raise or take a cut in hours or pay because someone else made a bad bet.

On the other hand, when a guy like Buffet (and I have no problem on a personal level with Buffet or Hillary or anyone else) makes a bad bet, he just reaches deeper into his pocket full of millions, makes another bet and hopes and knows that it will turn out better. And when he can't do that, the government bales him and his friends out.

If you get into your 80s, and you own a home but need to go into a nursing home, you spend down all your money and then Medicaid or Medical starts paying your nursing home bills and takes your house. Your heirs are out of luck unless you were savvy enough to protect your assets by giving them away when you are young. For the middle class, the cost of long-term care eats up the family inheritance. For the rich, the cost of nursing care is a trifle. So they have fought for the protection of their extra money from estate taxes. Another advantage that the rich have: The threats to their wealth are so different from the threats to the wealth of everyone else that they can buy access and laws that give them and their children a huge advantage.

Sorry, but I see these things and I finally have a venue -- the internet -- to explain them. I am basically a very happy person. I suppose I sound bitter but it is just because I see the game played around me. Thus far, I am really not one of the worst losers in that game, but somehow (probably my deeply religious family and heritage) the fact that the game is so, as Elizabeth Warren explains, "rigged" to favor those who have, to perpetuate their wealth and also "rigged" to not just impoverish but in many cases even disenfranchise the middle class and poor that I cannot remain quiet, see and know what is going on and say nothing.

I believe that capitalism can raise the boats of all members of society because it permits creative people to explore their creativity. It allows the economic freedom we need to have a progressive society, not just a progressive economy.

B U T, capitalism has to be tweaked so that it fulfills its promise and really does provide opportunities to those who have so much to give. Capitalism has to operate in a healthy society to fulfill its promise. And we cannot have a healthy society when the few grab their wealth and leave the rest of society owing, owing, owing and never accumulating much or even any wealth at all.

Education debt and the fact that the interest rates on education debt are higher than the interest rates that banks pay when they borrow from the government is an excellent example of how the wealth is transferred not from the rich to the poor but from the poor to the rich. How many college graduates in this country, especially those with advanced degrees are saddled with cruel debt that is preventing them from starting their own businesses, causing them to delay in starting a family and believing they will never own a house -- far too expensive.

We have so much to change if we are to get the best out of capitalism and out of our society, it isn't funny. When I hear Elizabeth Warren talk, I tend to think that she, as a lawyer who has studied the subject of bankruptcy and why ordinary people end up in bankruptcy courts, sees things somewhat as I do. Talk to ordinary people who have financial difficulties and you will see that they are confused and do not know what went wrong in many cases. Look at the law. Look at the way banks and our financial system works. You will see how the taking of risks by the wealthy actually in some ways draws money away from everyone who is not wealthy.

I do not think that Hillary Clinton understands this reality or has any motivation or desire to do anything effective about it. On the other hand, I recognize that she has a heart for the poor and cares about the issues of women and children. But I do not think she has the experience, the academic understanding or the heart to advocate for changes and programs that can lead us to deal with these problems.

I am disappointed that Warren Buffet who is an intelligent person as well as a wealthy one does not seem to understand that it is going to take a person who can express anger to get the inert thing we call government to do anything to stop the ball rolling toward even more injustice and more social inequity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 04:01 PM

37. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 04:19 PM

38. What he is really saying is that Elizabeth Warren is making his candidate

Hillary look bad, You know the candidate that he has committed millions too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to INdemo (Reply #38)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:38 AM

51. Would Warren thank you for pitting her against Hillary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 04:25 PM

39. We are more angry. Eat your god, money, and shit it out your ass Buffet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:06 PM

41. Angry?

Maybe if she had a penis she'd be seen as assertive, thoughtful, and full of good ideas for the average American. So tired of this crap.

2016 will be the year of the WOMAN!! Come on ladies, get out there, vote, and put more of us in office. Let's DO this!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:24 PM

42. It is because she doesn't support the TPP. Doesn't she sit on the committee for approval along

with Bernie Sanders? I know both of them abhor the treaties. Now she has to be made shrill and out of control. Triangulation by any other name would smell just as sweet ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:56 PM

44. NO

it's about time we all got angry. He or she that speaks the loudest gets heard.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 07:41 PM

45. If you're not mad about the problem, you are the problem.

Instead, he's mad about her tone. Thanks for your concern, Warren.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 08:12 PM

46. Shut up, Buffett. Go count your Trillions in offshored profits.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 10:58 PM

48. Buffett is scum

 

so don't listen to word he has to day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:41 AM

52. if you're not angry, you're not paying attention and...

I am freaking sick and tired of MEN acting like woMEN are inferior -

If a MAN were doing what Warren does, Buffet would call him "passionate about his cause"

f***kkk off, Mr. I'm Richer Than God and Better than You Buffet

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Mar 3, 2015, 05:21 PM

55. maybe more effective at fundraising with the rich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread