Deadly bacteria release sparks concern at Louisiana lab
Source: USA Today
A dangerous, often deadly, type of
bacteria that lives in soil and water has
been released from a high-security
laboratory at the Tulane National Primate
Research Center in Louisiana. Officials say
there is no risk to the public. Yet despite
weeks of investigation by multiple federal
and state agencies, the cause of the
release and the extent of the
contamination remain unknown, according
to interviews and records obtained by USA
TODAY.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/03/01/tulane-primate-bio-lab-bacteria-release/24137053/
C Moon
(12,208 posts)wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)too soon for the tin foil so I'm just going to slap my forehead. WTF!?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,548 posts)We have a winner.
drm604
(16,230 posts)four research animals and one human have tested positive for exposure to the bacteria.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It's a naturally-occurring bacteria. So exposure did not have to come from the lab.
drm604
(16,230 posts)Even if it is, they identified the infections as the strain that they were working with.
From the article:
...
SICK MACAQUES SIGNAL A BREACH
...
By mid-January, additional testing by CDC scientists determined that the strain of bacteria that sickened the two macaques was identical to the strain Tulane was using in its research in a highly secured lab elsewhere on the property.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You can suspect a breach due to this incident. You can not prove there was a breach just with this incident.
The article is written as if the lab is the only possible source of the bacteria. That isn't true.
drm604
(16,230 posts)Seriously, where else could it have come from?
They were working with this exact same strain in a nearby lab. If there were any other reasonable source for it, I think they'd realize that, and they seem pretty certain that it must have come from the lab. Why go looking for some obscure and unlikely source when there's an obvious one?
There's a saying, "when you hear hoofbeats, look for horses, not zebras.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It's a soil bacteria. Walk on soil in Australia where this bacteria is natural while collecting samples. Fly to US. Walk on US soil. Ta-da! bacteria in the US.
Because we already looked at the obvious source and did not find anything. So it's time to look for other causes, to see if they could be the cause.
dballance
(5,756 posts)murielm99
(30,712 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Yet at least four monkey-like rhesus macaques that were never used in the experiments and were kept in large outdoor cages in another part of the 500-acre facility have been exposed to the bacteria, initial tests have found. Two of the macaques became ill in November; both eventually had to be euthanized. Meanwhile, a federal investigator, who became ill 24 hours after visiting the facility in January as part of the ongoing release investigation, has also tested positive for exposure to the bacteria though it remains unclear whether her exposure may have occurred during international travel and not at the lab.
Anyone seen George Allen lately?
edit to add, I read more of the article, kind of sorry to have joked about it, this looks very serious! The lab where they were using this bacteria is nowere near the infected (now deceased) monkees, if I read the map correctly it's on the other side of campus from them, so potentially this is a very serious problem that needs to be exhaustively investigated.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Research Center
take a look at it on google map, the facility has junkpiles in backs of some of the buildings and a drainage pond area with overflows ground marks right to the river and woods.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)They don't seem to know enough to say that yet.
Javaman
(62,497 posts)Alkene
(752 posts)Javaman
(62,497 posts)you will get a knock on you door in a few hours, run for it!