Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:45 PM
TomCADem (16,344 posts)
Slate - Mercedes Colwin tells Hannity women lie about harassment for money - Does DU Agree?
Who knew that so many liberals and progressives are ideologically aligned with Sean Hannity. I read one post by someone on DU proclaiming that they are leaving the Democratic party because women Senators demanded that Senator Franken should resign due to credible allegations of harassment. These posts were echoed with violent sounding threats and remarks directors at Franken's accusers. Thus, you have to ask? Are we conceding that Franken's multiple accusers were all lying and making allegations of harassment for some personal advantage? Was Sean Hannity and Mercedes Colwin correct?
https://slate.com/business/2017/11/mercedes-colwin-tells-hannity-women-lie-about-harassment-for-money.html I try not to allow myself to get worked up about the vile things Fox News hosts and their guests say on air most nights. But I’ve had trouble getting this clip from Thursday night’s Hannity out of my head. In it, a powerful female attorney with a management role at a major American law firm says that women frequently make up sexual harassment claims for money and that actual victims of sexual predators are “few and far between.”
|
13 replies, 1064 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
TomCADem | Dec 2017 | OP |
SHRED | Dec 2017 | #1 | |
Mme. Defarge | Dec 2017 | #2 | |
TomCADem | Dec 2017 | #3 | |
Sen. Walter Sobchak | Dec 2017 | #4 | |
TomCADem | Dec 2017 | #5 | |
Sen. Walter Sobchak | Dec 2017 | #10 | |
loyalsister | Dec 2017 | #6 | |
Mme. Defarge | Dec 2017 | #13 | |
Nevernose | Dec 2017 | #7 | |
blueinredohio | Dec 2017 | #8 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Dec 2017 | #9 | |
Sen. Walter Sobchak | Dec 2017 | #11 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Dec 2017 | #12 |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:50 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
1. Many people here are upset because...
...Franken did not get a fair hearing.
NOT because women accused him. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:57 PM
Mme. Defarge (6,417 posts)
2. Its true, some people will do pretty much anything
for money. That’s why due process is a non-negotiable.
|
Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #2)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:01 PM
TomCADem (16,344 posts)
3. Due Process? Franken Resigned.
If I decide to quit my job, I don't need to go through a hearing.
Also, lets say Franken did engage in some of the acts that were alleged. I think it is a fair debate as to whether he should resign. Personally, I think it was okay that he apologized, and acknowledged what he did was wrong, but people can disagree. |
Response to TomCADem (Reply #3)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:08 PM
Sen. Walter Sobchak (8,692 posts)
4. Oh please, Senator Franken was completely ostracized.
The firm I work for is representing somebody who "resigned" too. After he was banished from the property, stripped of access to corporate networks, purged from the company website and staff were ordered to cease contact with him.
Settlement is going to be in the $500,000 - $600,000 range plus whatever they agree to buy his share of the company for. |
Response to Sen. Walter Sobchak (Reply #4)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:16 PM
TomCADem (16,344 posts)
5. So, there is a due process right not to be ostracized?
I always thought that due process related to when you were deprived of freedom or a property right. But, I had a due process right not to be ostracized? Wish I knew that back in high school when I was total Star Wars geek.
|
Response to TomCADem (Reply #5)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:31 PM
Sen. Walter Sobchak (8,692 posts)
10. You're being ridiculous
He resigned because there was no way forward, even when he was completely exonerated he wouldn't have been re-embraced by those who wanted his scalp to appease the shrieking hoard.
The question was whether or not he was interested in sitting as an independent for the rest of his term, he decided he wasn't. |
Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #2)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:20 PM
loyalsister (13,390 posts)
6. Franken wasn't accused of a crime
He was not entitled to a trial. This played out in the media as most scandals do. It sucks, but this was not a civil suit or criminal charge.
|
Response to loyalsister (Reply #6)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:49 PM
Mme. Defarge (6,417 posts)
13. His career in politics was destroyed,
his good name has been tarnished, and he was drummed out of office by his colleagues, who ganged up on him in an unseemly rush to judgement over unproven allegations of misconduct putting him in an untenable situation. That is the very definition of a hostile environment.
Not to mention the fact that his constituents had no say in the matter. If this happened in the private sector and I was one of the parties involved, I would be lawyering up. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:22 PM
Nevernose (13,081 posts)
7. Whats the ratio?
What’s the ratio of credible versus non-credible accusers one has to reach before you’re willing to believe a litany of ridiculous accusations?
What’s the exact number of anonymous, vague accusers one had to have before one is expected to resign? YOU once touched my waist with my consent, AND you once didn’t kiss me on the lips. Why haven’t you quit your job yet? Could it be because the accusations I made weren’t put on CNN completely uncritically? |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:25 PM
blueinredohio (4,847 posts)
8. He wanted an investigation but didn't get one
Response to blueinredohio (Reply #8)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:28 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
9. Because he resigned. Nt
Response to Dr Hobbitstein (Reply #9)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:34 PM
Sen. Walter Sobchak (8,692 posts)
11. Suppose he hadn't resigned,
Would the shrieking calls for resignation and character assassination ceased?
Asking someone to tolerate months on ongoing harassment for the pyrrhic victory of being an exonerated independent is a lot to ask. |
Response to Sen. Walter Sobchak (Reply #11)
Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:36 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
12. If I were innocent, I would deal with it. Exoneration feels invigorating. Nt