General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI detest all monarchies and I mean all
I also detest their non-stop self promotion BUT anything that pisses off the whites only racists is good news.
Congrats Harry and Meghan.
MineralMan
(146,253 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)kairos12
(12,841 posts)Rollo
(2,559 posts)And elected monarch, but a monarch nonetheless.
And our system of choosing our elected monarchs leaves something to be desired: Trum
kairos12
(12,841 posts)Cicada
(4,533 posts)They generate vastly more profit than they cost. And going ro countless events which people enjoy is a lot of work for which people should be grateful.
malaise
(268,672 posts)racists
Cicada
(4,533 posts)That the civil war generates profits today does not mean that all things which generate profits today are bad.
Farmer-Rick
(10,134 posts)Enslaved entire nations. Ask India how they liked British rule? The royals today are some of the richest people in the world. How did they earn it? And yet most British citizens have to pay over $9,000 a year in tuition to attend college. It use to be free. And it is estimated that over 3,500 each night in England sleep rough or are what the US calls homeless.
Really, most kings and queens cost a country much, much more than they bring in in tourist dollars. I would prefer to spend the money on the homeless and tution than in support of royalty and all their castles and luxuries.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,134 posts)Shoud not be visited upon the son either. But it uniformly is.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)What if you had to go to an endless parade of ceremonies with local military units, various civic groups, all the time? Wouldnt you rather have a normal life?
If there were no royal family many people in the tourism industry would not have their job. Letting William live in a palace is a good investment for the workers of England. And he pays a heavy price, attending an endless stream of horribly boring events.
Farmer-Rick
(10,134 posts)To many a hungry person, that job sounds just fine.
adigal
(7,581 posts)Harry is as clueless and racist as his Granddaddy Phillip.
Stryst
(714 posts)And in the modern time, they've participated wholecloth in the sacking and looting of Iraq.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)From his service in the US Army at that time?
William and Harry are not to blame for the decisions of the British government. It is not reasonable to expect them to resist service. That would be asking too much of anyone in their position.
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)Because thats what Apache gunners in the middle of a war do.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)all those British women who went to the right schools, right places to snare Harry
I will be making the trip across the pond..so happy for them..
Cicada
(4,533 posts)She had a poster of him on her bedroom wall growing up. She wore that transparent dress in the fashion show he attended at school knowing exactly how William would react. She targeted him, got him, and now they are living happily ever after. It is a beautiful story. I hope Harry is so lucky.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Isn't that kind of a 1950s way of referring to a woman - like "landing a husband?"
Cicada
(4,533 posts)I have targeted and nabbed women a time or two, arranging events to put myself in an appealing light. This is perhaps a very fifties thing but then I grew up in the fifties and sixties. I really really admire Kate and I find her scheming deliscious.
I guess you know her personally and can therefore attest to her "scheming."
Cicada
(4,533 posts)I have been lucky to have lived a full life in many varied circumstances, to have had many friends who have confided in me. I have read a great deal about Kate. I know she wanted him from the start. I know she is clever. I know she got what she wanted. It would insult her to deny that she Saw her chances and took them.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)She had his photo on her childhood bedroom wall. She fell in love with him when she was a child. When it was announced that he would attend St Andrews she switched college to go there.
Get a clue!
I have been blessed to have known some women with social skills I would have never known were available to people. Kate Middleton is a wonderful and intelligent woman capable of moving the world to achieve her goals, in my humble opinion.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Wondering where you get your info lol.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)She had a place at the University of Edinburgh, ranked the fifth best in the U.K.. During her gap year it was announced that William would attend St Andrews. Kate then cancelled her place at Edinburgh and applied to St Andrews, ranked 16th best in the U.K. They are not far apart in miles. There would be no logical reason to reject the better school and the vastly better city for the lesser one, unless you wanted to meet the boy whose photo you put up on your wall when you were a little girl and whose image you had looked at longingly every day of your life for many years.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)So how was that her gap year?
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Students there take a gap year before they start college. You get into college and then delay starting to take a gap year. In that gap year she learned William was going to St Andrews. It is a dreamy place to go to college, But not as thrilling as the nearby Edinburgh. Yet she dropped her reserved spot at Edinburgh to go to St Andrews instead. I am sure she did that so she could meet the boy whose photo she put on her wall as a child, whose photo she looked at longingly every day of her life. This is a super dooper wonderful love story. A little girl falls in love with a handsome Prince and despite all the odds in the world works to meet him and gets him to fall in love with her too. Love stories dont get any better than this. This story makes me have faith in the world. Miracles do happen.
You seem VERY well read on the royal family's doings - University Challenge or Mastermind level, except for the conspiracy stuff, but ...
I live in Scotland. Not only is St Andrews a much more prestigious university (FWIW) than Edinburgh, good as Edinburgh is, but (excuse Wikipedia, the numbered sources are at the link):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_St_Andrews
Cicada
(4,533 posts)I do not know Arianna Huffington. But a roommate of mine was in a religious cult with her and he told me as it happened about some of the advice she gave about finding and marrying a rich man. She did find and marry a rich man. Arianna Huffington is friends with basically every important person on earth. This is not an accident. And it is not a criticism of her to point out that she is calculating. That does not make her insincere. She is sincere. She also just happens to know how the world works, and how to do things and say things which will help people see you in an appropriately positive light.
So yes I do not find it an accident that one of the millions who wanted to marry William ended up marrying him.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Such an odd thing to say.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)But then I lived with a woman for five years who opened my eyes to many things. She had the highest grades ever at our law school by a decent margin. She clerked at the Supreme Court. You would think the anonymous grades were simply due to her brilliance and hard work. But they were more. She explained that she figured out what a professor wanted to hear. She became friends with teachers and got to know what they thought. She did not write answers she thought were best but instead wrote answers she knew fit the world view of the teacher. In my opinion she learned to read people because her parents were cruel and she had to read their minds to avoid angering them. She was not unusually attractive but had some amazing lovers. A beautiful guy for instance who was in the Vermont legislature tho only 21 years old. I never suspected, figuring he would not be interested in her. I came to understand that some people can create the world they want. Millions wanted to marry William but only one did. When it was announced that William would attend St Andrews Kate changed colleges to go there. Her childhood room had his photo, she had always been in love with him. Having seen someone who could achieve anything, who explained to me precisely how she did it, how she figured out what a person would think and how they would respond, I am afraid I suspect they did not just happen to meet and then fell in love. And with time I understand that that is not a bad thing. I do not think Bill Clinton became President by accident. Arkansas did not have the highest job growth of all states by accident. The US did not have the greatest job growth during the Clinton years of the G20 by accident.
Some people see the world more deeply than others and figure out how to create circumstances which they want.
Meghan, just engaged. Read about her. You will find she is good friends with an amazing number of interesting, important people. Arianna Huffington is good friends with just about every important person on earth. My roommate before law school was in a religious cult with her and he told me some things she said to the women there about how to find and marry a rich husband, which she then did. Now this sounds calculating, and it is. But this is not a bad thing, this is how many wonderful things come to happen. It was not chance alone that got Thurgood Marshall to broaden his views from race discrimination to sex discrimination, it was also a very clever young woman he called sugar who slept in his bathtub at the Supreme Court because she had too much work to do to make the world better than to go home to sleep. This is not a bad thing, this wonderful Kate Middleton.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Never mind.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Why did she drop her spot at Edinburgh, ranked fifth in the U.K., for St Andrews, ranked 16th, once it was announced William would go there?
Ok, one of the most interesting books ever was Caros first book about LBJ. You like politics and I am sure you will love this book. You can learn something reading it. For instance you can learn that LBJ had absolutely incredible ability to get all those around him to do what he wanted. Some people can get the rest of us to do what they want. When millions want William and one gets him the odds are very high that that one has traits like those LBJ had.
Thats amazing! And extremely interesting. Dont shut your mind to this insight I am giving you. If you give my view a chance, if you read that Caro book, you will have heightened insight into politics at the highest level.
Kate is like LBJ!
Glorfindel
(9,714 posts)the consort of King George III. It's quite an interesting story.
http://www.aaregistry.org/historic_events/view/englands-first-black-queen-sophie-charlotte-born
eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Harry is marrying Meghan. I am sure the Royal Family has downplayed it up until this point.
colorado_ufo
(5,730 posts)children, George and Charlotte.
Glorfindel
(9,714 posts)not fooled
(5,801 posts)to act as entertainment and provide a spectacle.
And, modern monarchies serve as ambassadors for the heritage and culture of their countries.
Oh, and great for Harry for marrying for affection and compatibility. Surely that's a sign of further social evolution in the monarchy.
adigal
(7,581 posts)world.
And we KNOW what the French did to their royals.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,131 posts)Botany
(70,442 posts)... be "born w/Royal blood?"
I wish the couple well and I wish even harder that I'll never have to hear one
word about their upcoming wedding and or their various births and deaths.
malaise
(268,672 posts)because it will be non-stop mush from now until the wedding.
And yes this royal blood BS is overbearing.
Botany
(70,442 posts)And will she have a wedding gown and a different outfit for her post wedding
parties?
and then it will be war for the 'look alike' dresses at the bridal shops
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Inquiring minds WANT to know!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I am wondering if they are set on having children. If so, they should make it a priority before she gets much older.
VMA131Marine
(4,135 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)I wonder. Hahahahah
TexasBushwhacker
(20,131 posts)That's what Charles and Camilla did.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Didn't we have a war in 1776 so we didn't have to deal w/the fake idea that people can..."
No. That particular conflict was due to the Proclamation of 1763 and the crown deciding to make the American colonies pay a large share of the war debt from the French and Indian War via additional tax mechanisms.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)But there are a lot more negative examples I admit.
Bryant
malaise
(268,672 posts)Seriously
NotASurfer
(2,146 posts)geardaddy
(24,926 posts)malaise
(268,672 posts)Butterflylady
(3,537 posts)This is great news. She's going to make a great princess!
PatrickforO
(14,558 posts)Anybody getting pissed because she's black...fuck them. She's going to be a fine Duchess!
dalton99a
(81,391 posts)But congrats to the couple
jg10003
(974 posts)Majority of British citizens want it. So in a sense, the monarchy is a result of democracy.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)The British people seem to be very happy with their monarchy, so i'm not going to second-guess them.
Moreover, the royal children didn't ask to be born into this family and this generation - especially Harry and William - appear to be doing everything they can to earn their keep. They seem like caring, humble, decent young men and I like them immensely.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)Someone you could literally have a beer with and enjoy a great conversation. They both leverage their station in life to try to bring some good to the world.
A far, far cry from the international humiliation and disgrace that serves as the mascot for this country.
adigal
(7,581 posts)and said they want to pare down what royals have to do??
William did something like 170 events last year - and his events are about an hour long
Harry did 165 or so - an hour or so for each one
Queen E did 332
The 90 something Prince Philip did 219
Kate did 140
Charles did 530, plus runs the Prince's Trust, which he asked William or Harry to take over and both refused.
The younger royals don't want to work. They just want to renovate their estates, fly on helicopters to their vacations, buy 5K dresses, all courtesy of the Duchy, which is owned by.....ta dum!! The British people!!! They are spoiled, petulant, entitled, racist assholes.
Think Ivanka Trump's abuses, and being stuck with her family for 100 years. That is the younger branch of the BRF.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)He gave up the job a few months ago so that he can focus on royal duties full time. He was in the military until 2013.
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/-prince-william-steps-down-from-ambulance-job-to-become-fulltime-royal-20170727-gxjwqt.html
Princes William and Harry started their own charitable foundation a few years ago. Not sure where you got your claims that they refused to take on charitable work or asked that royal duties be scaled back. Got a cite?
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Looks like you just made that up ...
Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)Hmm.
See this thread from a few days ago where I had a brief debate with someone about "How can voters choose to demand a vote to get rid of the monarchy in a constitutional monarchy?": https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=9865534
malaise
(268,672 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)Maybe you could tell, I had a bit of hoot writing it.
We're still stuck with 'em, though ...
malaise
(268,672 posts)Vinca
(50,236 posts)Give me Harry any day over Jared.
adigal
(7,581 posts)Vinca
(50,236 posts)melm00se
(4,984 posts)by a 20 year old kid.
I guess you were never were a dumb kid?
eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)malaise
(268,672 posts)Those are fine
Oneironaut
(5,480 posts)Are the monarchs in the UK real government entities? I always thought they were just powerless figureheads.
LeftInTX
(25,106 posts)In case Parliament dissolves or something far-fetched like that.
I also read the Queen is the final signature for war declaration.
Oneironaut
(5,480 posts)ananda
(28,833 posts)I was really rooting for them!
I hope that means he's ditched his
youthful neonazi proclivities.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)It does not feel much better, when incompetent leaders becomes politicians or even presidents mainly through family connections. Some of this even formalized as the Widow's Succession (and never the other way round). And allowing Big Money to buy their own politicians...
nocalflea
(1,387 posts)Agent in place !
Finally payback for Benedict Arnolding us .
First objective : silencing those chaos agents known as corgis.
Second objective : producing beautiful heirs to the throne.
Third objective: trimming the Prince of Wales' ears (oops the shears slipped).
Fourth objective : Send the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and their children on a state visit to British Virgin Islands (family last seen on sailboat nearing the Bermuda triangle).
Fifth objective : Sit back and wait.
Sixth objective: King Harry tours the U.S. ( Denali National Park, inebriated King attacked by Grizzly while pissing in snowbank).
Upon his majority, King Barry successfully petitions the Prime Minister and Parliament to officially change "Guy Hawks Day" to " Benedict Arnold and all those other Treasonweasels Day"
Farage, Trump and Assange become the top selling effigys.
On July 4th,2039 - King Barry declares the end of the British Monarchy in stirring address to the nation, " Promoting inherited wealth and social status is soooo 21st century thinking. Now excuse me , I have a barbecue to attend. "
edbermac
(15,933 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The two stable forms of government are a monarch/emperor allied with the peasants/plebeians and an oligarchy allied with the burghers/bourgeoisie.
The top/bottom alliance versus the middle. Dictator/proletariat versus the capitalists.
applegrove
(118,462 posts)have her.
malaise
(268,672 posts)and he will not be invited. That should be serious fun.
applegrove
(118,462 posts)know the Obamas will be invited.
malaise
(268,672 posts)Remember the Queen had no plan of meeting the Con.
adigal
(7,581 posts)applegrove
(118,462 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)Harry is unemployed, poorly educated, just shows up for the photo-ops for "his" charities after all the work is done and wore a Nazi uniform to a party when in his 20s.
Meghan is well educated, made a life as an actress, which isn't easy, has a life of her own, and dropped it all to go live with the lazy sot, in another country, joining a family who will make her life hell.
I wonder what is really in it for her besides all the money the British taxpayers will provide and fame and status. Hmmmm.....
malaise
(268,672 posts)Until we burn books like Cinderella, girls and women will aspire for this bullshit
adigal
(7,581 posts)cause HE changed for Belle.
Now my daughter is a hard core feminist who is applying for her Phd in studies of how society creates what we think women should be. If I got that right?? Ha!
malaise
(268,672 posts)and yes it is society led by religion and the state that creates these roles - and many parents and grandparents (and the fugging schools) willingly push the agenda.
Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)she could have done better?
Heh.
You could be right. I'm a Brit, and not a royalist.
But I don't envy either of them the inevitable press intrusion, and the horrible tendency to build these public figures up only to knock them down again at a strategic point. They did that to Harry's mum. It was sickening to watch the hypocrisy after her death.
adigal
(7,581 posts)She looks like the cat that got the canary.
But if she cares about the things she has claimed to care about - women making their own way, feminism, etc. - then she is full of it. Cause as a Brit, you know that the British Royal family will knock her down to make her less showy, less outgoing, less threatening to Kate's place in the media. They will shut her up, and shut her down. She will be a shadow of herself. I think she is nuts marrying into this family, especially not being British, divorced and an actress who took a lot of her clothes off on tv. I can't imagine the British public falling in love with her.
Denzil_DC
(7,219 posts)One of the royal family's functions is to provide a continuity of distraction!
Harry's a minor royal ("the spare" ), in a position that in the past's bred wastrels and libertines, and as you outlined above, he's not infrequently been an embarrassment. He took a long time to grow up - maybe inevitable given his childhood. I think those who care about these things will probably hope she'll straighten him out once and for all.
We'll have to wait and see how it pans out. I think the royal entourage learned a few lessons from Diana's time. Her two sons, still marked by that, are unlikely to let all the internal palace politicking get so out of hand again, I reckon. She'll probably get on with her future sister-in-law OK.
I think the trend in future will be to downscale the royals to Nordic standards, and another photogenic face to take up the slack of public appearances will probably be welcome since the queen's getting on and old Philip can't do it any more.
Like I said, I'm not a royalist, but I can't be bothered harboring personal animosity against any of them who doesn't go out of their way to earn it.
adigal
(7,581 posts)He was in his 20s.
He gets a pass cause he is harry, prince of whatever.
panader0
(25,816 posts)I remember Bobby Sands and the Struggles. Reading 'Trinity' by Leon Uris
gave me some insight too. The Royals are a royal pain in the ass.
But I've always kind of liked Harry and now his choice of a bride.
GoCubsGo
(32,073 posts)I'm already sick of hearing about it, and I definitely don't look forward the non-stop hoopla over it But, knowing that it pisses off the racists will make it easier to get through it. That being said, I hope they have a happy life together. In spite of several incidents of stupidity, Harry has actually turned out to be a decent kid. I wish him and his future wife well.
adigal
(7,581 posts)I don't know what I call it, except horrible and unforgivable.
And he is a lazy, entitled sot, too. He and his brother love to hunt, too.
They kind of remind me of Trump's kids.
GoCubsGo
(32,073 posts)And, yes. Out of a young 20-something kid, I consider that stupidity. People grow up and change. Go stew in your bitterness somewhere else. I'm not interested in it.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)He got reamed for it in the media and I think he learned his lesson. Harry is not a Nazi, it was just really stupid.
eta: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1481148/Prince-Harry-faces-outcry-at-Nazi-outfit.html
It happened in 2005 when he was only 20. God knows I did some stupid things at that age. Not a Nazi uniform but others. If he had been 30 or 40, I wouldn't be so kind about it.
trixie2
(905 posts)She was a vehement anti monarchist but she would love this.
My dad's oldest sister hated the royals, and detested colonialism and imperialism. One of my oldest childhood memories is her acerbic comments re celebrations in 1953. She had a profound influence on my world view.
Beakybird
(3,330 posts)but now we have the Royal Asshole.