Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,084 posts)
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 03:57 PM Nov 2017

Doubts surface about key witness, William Douglas Campbell, in Uranium One probe of Clinton

Both the Republican led Congressional investigations all stated with tweet from Trump. Suckers!!

Democrats should be all over this story--casting doubt on this witness!!





Doubts surface about key witness in Uranium One probe of Clinton




https://www.yahoo.com/news/doubts-surface-key-witness-uranium-one-probe-clinton-203614558.html?.tsrc=fauxdal


Michael Isikoff


Chief Investigative Correspondent

,Yahoo News•November 17, 2017
Photo illustration: Yahoo News, photos; AP (2), Getty Images (2).

Federal officials have serious questions about the credibility of a key witness in congressional investigations of Hillary Clinton’s role in the sale of a uranium-mining company to Russian interests, two sources knowledgeable about the case tell Yahoo News.

The witness, a Florida businessman and former FBI informant named William Douglas Campbell, was considered so unreliable that prosecutors dropped him as a witness in an unrelated case involving Russian uranium sales, according to the sources.
Related Searches
Uranium One ClintonHillary Clinton Uranium ScandalClinton And Uranium Deal

The investigations by two House subcommittees, apparently spurred by a tweet from President Trump last month, focus on allegations about Clinton’s role in approving the controversial sale of Uranium One, a company that owned American uranium mines, to Rosatom, the Russian atomic energy company, in 2010. Campbell has suggested he can prove that approval of the sale was a quid pro quo for donations by Russian-connected parties to the Clinton Foundation.

But there are mounting questions about Campbell’s credibility in light of his track record as an informant in a separate FBI
investigation into a Russian businessman named Vadim Mikerin, who was in charge of U.S. operations for Tenex — a separate unit of Rosatom that was not involved in the Uranium One purchase.

Court records and interviews with the sources who are familiar with the case indicate that Campbell provided key information to the FBI about a scheme orchestrated by Mikerin to collect kickbacks from American companies doing business with Tenex. The bureau enlisted Campbell as an undercover informant who wore a wire in his conversations with Russian officials.

But he proved a “disaster” as a potential witness in the case when doubts arose about his descriptions of some events that could not be documented, one of the sources said. As a result, prosecutors dropped extortion charges against Mikerin that relied on Campbell’s testimony. “There was no question that [Campbell’s] credibility was such that [the prosecutors] had to restructure the case,” the source said. “He got cut out of the case entirely.”.......................................

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doubts surface about key witness, William Douglas Campbell, in Uranium One probe of Clinton (Original Post) riversedge Nov 2017 OP
So this time the bribe is to bring uranium INTO the US? Cicada Nov 2017 #1
All the non- weapons grade uranium mined by U1 sold in America. America imports uranium Fred Sanders Nov 2017 #2
There are now two different wing nut uranium bribery allegations Cicada Nov 2017 #3
Having figured out they were lied to about uranium going to the Russians, now the Deplorables Fred Sanders Nov 2017 #4

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
1. So this time the bribe is to bring uranium INTO the US?
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 04:04 PM
Nov 2017

So Uranium One was bad cause the Russkies got our precious bodily...I mean got our precious Uranium. And now there is an alleged bribe so the russkies can bring THEIR Uranium INTO the US?

These guys should make up their minds about which is the good place (US?) and which is the bad place (communist Ruskyland?)

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
2. All the non- weapons grade uranium mined by U1 sold in America. America imports uranium
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 06:10 PM
Nov 2017

because it has so little.

Your premises are mistaken.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
3. There are now two different wing nut uranium bribery allegations
Sat Nov 18, 2017, 11:58 PM
Nov 2017

The alleged uranium One scandal presume Hillary sold out our Uranium to Russia. I know Uranium may not be exported without government approval. And more than that if we need that precious Uranium One ore Trump can just seize it back via eminent domain seizure rights. I guess Trump hasn’t done that because he’s a Rusky agent just like Hillary. But now Fox News is excited because a former FBI agent says he has proof of Russian bribery related to Uranium in America. But in this story The gol durn Ruskies bribed us to permit sales of Russian Uranium to American buyers. So they yell treason about the brain dead notion Uranium One ore will go from America to Russia. And then yell treason about just the opposite, Russian Uranium being sent to us.

They haven’t figured out the problem of claiming treason for going in and treason for going out at the same time.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. Having figured out they were lied to about uranium going to the Russians, now the Deplorables
Sun Nov 19, 2017, 12:36 AM
Nov 2017

are begging to be lied to to about the reverse? Thanks, did not know that...they really are deplorable. The Senate investigation is a deplorable Fox ordered charade, now for all to see...it needs rescue so more fake news desperately manufactured by the same Fox.

Fox is aptly named.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Doubts surface about key ...