HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » you testified at least 36...

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:53 PM

you testified at least 36 times that you cant recall. Is that correct?

Funniest moment yet: Mr. Sessions you testified at least 36 times that you canít recall. Is that correct? Sessions: I donít know. https://t.co/mgAThKpBg6

11 replies, 1036 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
Reply you testified at least 36 times that you cant recall. Is that correct? (Original post)
G_j Nov 14 OP
Achilleaze Nov 14 #1
defacto7 Nov 14 #2
joshcryer Nov 14 #3
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 14 #4
joshcryer Nov 14 #5
Skittles Nov 14 #6
n2doc Nov 14 #7
angrychair Nov 14 #8
progressoid Nov 14 #9
cwydro Nov 14 #11
Progressive dog Nov 14 #10

Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:58 PM

1. The republican Perjurer General is wallowing in an epic cesspool of

lies and evasion...just like his boss, the republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:00 PM

2. Another case of dementia in government.

Self inflicted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:02 PM

3. The Republicans THRIVE on incompetency.

We had this same shit under Bush. Same damn shit. We had this same shit under Regan, same fucking shit. GHWB had it a little bit, but he was too competent, which is why he lost his second run. They cannot function being competent. The American people will give them a pass for their incompetency.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joshcryer (Reply #3)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:06 PM

4. I think it is willful. In this case, Sessions is up to his eyeballs in collusion. . . . nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #4)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:08 PM

5. Oh yes, they were so incompetent they couldn't collude properly.

They actually thought they'd get away with this shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:22 PM

6. and he hates pot smokers

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:25 PM

7. Musical accompaniment

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:31 PM

8. Nothing says im not guilty

Like saying ďI donít rememberĒ dozens of times but otherwise having a strong grasp on the fact that you definitely are not guilty of the stuff you cannot remember.

Or having no problem remembering or producing documentation on how bad immigrants are, gay people are or how bad pot is but damn if they canít remember a single meeting or produce a single note from a meeting with Russians or team members we know for a fact they attended.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:47 PM

9. Well, it worked for Ronald Reagan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to progressoid (Reply #9)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:50 PM

11. And old Ollie North.

Disgraceful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:49 PM

10. To be expected

Incompetence, arrogant ignorance, and lying for fun have become the new Republican norm.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread