Wed Nov 1, 2017, 06:57 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
This is terrible tax plan for middle level managers
There are those of us who are hard working reliable mid-level managers .. But not quite superstars.. We stuck in middle.. And hung out to dry..
We are going to get fucked.. And there won't be anyone to help us. If you don't itemize your returns - I am sure you are quite happy with the doubling of std. deduction. If you earn mainly through an llc or a corporation.. You are going to be making out like a bandit. Those of us working 50-60 weeks, killing ourselves for the next promotion and be able to pay our mortgages.. And the super high property taxes (not uncommon to pay 25000 in my town) so that our kids can go to good schools. For all my troubles - the following things are probably gone: state and local tax deduction, mortgage interest deduction and tax deferred 401 contributions. I am sure there will be many on DU who don't care much for any of the above.. But just because it doesn't affect you does not mean that it is not a punch to the gut for someone. I am all for shared burden.. But in this case Republicans are stealing from the educated upper middle class (who mostly vote Democratic) and giving it to the filthy rich.
|
50 replies, 2338 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | OP |
taught_me_patience | Nov 2017 | #1 | |
Angry Dragon | Nov 2017 | #3 | |
taught_me_patience | Nov 2017 | #7 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #9 | |
Johonny | Nov 2017 | #12 | |
MyNameIsKhan | Nov 2017 | #2 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #4 | |
taught_me_patience | Nov 2017 | #5 | |
MyNameIsKhan | Nov 2017 | #6 | |
MyNameIsKhan | Nov 2017 | #8 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #10 | |
cemaphonic | Nov 2017 | #44 | |
taught_me_patience | Nov 2017 | #48 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #11 | |
Johonny | Nov 2017 | #13 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #17 | |
WillowTree | Nov 2017 | #20 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #21 | |
WillowTree | Nov 2017 | #23 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #36 | |
lagomorph777 | Nov 2017 | #14 | |
roamer65 | Nov 2017 | #15 | |
SweetieD | Nov 2017 | #16 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #18 | |
SweetieD | Nov 2017 | #19 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #22 | |
smirkymonkey | Nov 2017 | #45 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #30 | |
Skidmore | Nov 2017 | #24 | |
Bettie | Nov 2017 | #25 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #26 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #28 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #31 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #37 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #39 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #43 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #47 | |
Johnny2X2X | Nov 2017 | #27 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #29 | |
Johnny2X2X | Nov 2017 | #32 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #34 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #38 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #35 | |
WinkyDink | Nov 2017 | #33 | |
Hoyt | Nov 2017 | #40 | |
maryellen99 | Nov 2017 | #42 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #46 | |
Demsrule86 | Nov 2017 | #41 | |
Joe941 | Nov 2017 | #49 | |
Le Gaucher | Nov 2017 | #50 |
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:06 PM
taught_me_patience (5,477 posts)
1. My wife and I will be hit hard. We're upper middle class in California
We'll lose 35k in SALT deductions. Plus, our marginal tax rate is 43%, so the reduction of the 401k would be a HUGE blow to our ability to save. I'm middle management and wife is a physician who works about 60 hours a week... so we're pretty much in the same boat as you. It sucks. Most here at DU don't really care because it affects those making 150-350k.
|
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #1)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:20 PM
Angry Dragon (36,693 posts)
3. I do not have your situation BUT I DO CARE
Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #3)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:27 PM
taught_me_patience (5,477 posts)
7. Thanks.
I really shouldn't have said "most". "Some" on DU don't seem to care about the upper middle class, but we are just hard working democratic supporters too.
|
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:53 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
9. All my tax proposal related threads have sunken like stone
I Imagine if DU isn't against this.. This will probably pass with bipartisan majority.
|
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #1)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:29 AM
Johonny (18,684 posts)
12. Same here. The net result is an even larger draining of California tax money out of state
My fear is: The state GOP will use this as a driver to demand lower state taxes, but that only lowers the amount of government money available to use within the state. Making 150K in California with a new house and child. I'll be crushed bigly by this and then hit again when the property values plummet like we know it will without the SALT and mortgage.
This is the I'll never vote GOP again, tax plan. It will crush my family finances. |
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:13 PM
MyNameIsKhan (2,202 posts)
2. I am in your boat ... based on the plan I am looking at 10k more Fed taxes
Response to MyNameIsKhan (Reply #2)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:21 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
4. My fear is that there aren't enough of us to topple this tax reform
I am hoping home builders assn, realtors and money managers like fidelity / prudential oppose this big time.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #4)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:25 PM
taught_me_patience (5,477 posts)
5. I hope that republicans in blue states block it
Dana Rohrbacher (R -puke) the rep of my gerrymandered shit ass district... he'll be gone if he votes for this shit.
|
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #5)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:27 PM
MyNameIsKhan (2,202 posts)
6. huh ! the russian stooge
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #5)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:29 PM
MyNameIsKhan (2,202 posts)
8. The issue is how to fund the tax breaks Repukes have promised, 5.5Trillion over 10years and
under budget reconciliation only 1.5T is allowed, they need to find 4T, SALT gives them 1.8T, partial 401k who knows how much... then there is talk about raising other taxes that maynot hit upper middle class.
|
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #5)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 07:57 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
10. My fear is that Democrats from poor districts in Red states will support it
Enough to counter Republicans voting against the bill.
Only hope is that Democrats vote lock step against the bill and are joined by blue state Republicans. |
Response to taught_me_patience (Reply #5)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:26 PM
cemaphonic (4,138 posts)
44. Yeah, this seems like an incredibly risky gamble for the GOP
There are millions of affluent suburban professional people that are reliable voters, who don't give a rat's ass about either the Republican or Democratic social agenda, but usually vote R because they think it's good for their pocketbook. And these people are financially literate, many with accountants (or ARE accountants). They'll see their taxes raised by a GOP Congress preaching "tax reform," and they're not going to buy whatever chum Fox is throwing out.
And those suburban districts are exactly the sort of places where their current gerrymandered strategy could fall on its face. Not to mention, it could cripple them at the state and local level. |
Response to cemaphonic (Reply #44)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:56 PM
taught_me_patience (5,477 posts)
48. Capping the mortgage interest deduction at 500k makes it even worse
I can't possibly see how blue state republicans can vote for this. Median home price in my district is probably $1M, and this will have a negative impact on housing prices.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #4)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 09:51 AM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
11. I am reading the tax reform.. Looks like 401k and property tax
Deductions are untouched.
The bill is mainly catering to corporations.. 20% tax rate. However.. More and more jobs are going to be automated leaving fewer people to share the spoils. Not fair. |
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #11)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:31 AM
Johonny (18,684 posts)
13. Without the personal exemption and state taxes
It's still going to hit us hard.
|
Response to Johonny (Reply #13)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:59 AM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
17. agreed .. I am still going to be hit.
i am hoping the bill fails the house vote
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #11)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:13 AM
WillowTree (5,325 posts)
20. They left the 401k alone, but the property tax deduction is capped to $10,000 from what I've read.
Response to WillowTree (Reply #20)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:27 AM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
21. not uncommon to have 25k property taxes in my town
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #21)
WillowTree This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #11)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:37 AM
lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)
14. Trump's Middle Class Tax Hike
The Dems need to repeat this accurate description over and over and over again. If we continue to use weak language about this assault on the middle class, we will lose again.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:46 AM
roamer65 (34,981 posts)
15. Just wait until it blows a hole in the deficit and invokes a dollar crisis.
That's when the real fun starts.
![]() |
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 10:50 AM
SweetieD (1,660 posts)
16. Not sure how the plan would affect me. But being single with no kids and no mortgage and
Student loans out the wazoo. I don't get any breaks except for the student loan deduction which is small. And I hear that is going away or will be further reduced.
|
Response to SweetieD (Reply #16)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:04 AM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
18. I refi'ed my student loan using SoFi
My interest went down from 5.6 to 3.75%
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Reply #18)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:11 AM
SweetieD (1,660 posts)
19. My student loan situation is a nightmare. And is the subject of another thread. There is no
Refinancing option that works for me. And I will be paying until I die. My student loans are equivalent to a mortgage or greater.
|
Response to SweetieD (Reply #19)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:28 AM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
22. same here .. I pay $700/month in student loans
Response to SweetieD (Reply #19)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:26 PM
smirkymonkey (63,221 posts)
45. I am in the same situation as you. It's a nightmare and the republicans are only making it worse.
There is no way out but death. Meanwhile, billionaires like Trump go bankrupt to the tune of millions all the time and just walk away from their obligations time and time again, but people like us can't even get a break.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to SweetieD (Reply #16)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:45 AM
Skidmore (37,364 posts)
24. We are far below upper middle class
and the children are long gone. If the mortgage deduction and state tax deductions go, we will be in dire straits, especially with the blows to healthcare in this state. We are all in this together Unfortunately, many upper middle/middle class people have been all to willing to step on those further down to gain financial privilege over the past few decades. This parasitic bleeding of those less advantaged is systemic. Forsaking fairness has gotten us to this point. All I can do is try to find like minded candidates to vote for vales of fairness and protection from predation. This is why elections matter. This is why the interests of all groups must be accounted for. This is why promises of ideologues are not helpful.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 11:57 AM
Bettie (14,955 posts)
25. We're going to take a hit too
in all likelihood.
When my husband (who is the one who likes to look at the numbers) looks it over, it looks pretty bad, or so he tells me. |
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:11 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
26. I doubt many people will be hurt DIRECTLY in the plan released today. Some will, but
I bet GOPers cave on state income and property tax limits if enough people are impacted.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-gop-tax-reform-plan-bill-text-details-rate-2017-10 There are other reasons to oppose this bill/proposal, mainly it doesn't increase taxes at upper end. |
Response to Hoyt (Reply #26)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #28)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:49 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
31. You must be making a ton of money unless by "much increased" you mean a few thousand dollars.
Would love to see your calculations.
|
Response to Hoyt (Reply #31)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #37)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:06 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
39. So, you still deduct your $5500 under Trump's plan. You lose some state income tax deduction, but
likely make up for most of that with the slightly lower tax rates (you may even end up benefiting a little, not much, by increased standard deduction, of course at cost of losing personal exemption).
Again, the plan is deficient in other ways, but I don't think the cap of $10,000 on property taxes will have any effect on MOST people except in high housing cost states. Losing the state income tax deduction might have a small increase on those making under $100,000 depending upon your state. I bet GOPers don't repeal the state income tax deduction (they'll call that their big compromise) -- even red states will have a hard time explaining support of that. As to your last question -- I think you have to put what you whine about into perspective. Like I've said before. I'd gladly have my income tax increase from the present rate to $5 Million next year. That would mean I made a bunch of money. |
Response to Hoyt (Reply #39)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #43)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:31 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
47. That would be one of those other matters to criticize ("whine" about).
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:27 PM
Johnny2X2X (16,331 posts)
27. It's a big give away to the rich, but not awful for the poor
Doubling the standard deductions will off set the harm to the poor. The working poor will see the 1st $12K of their income as not taxable for singles, The first $24K is not taxable for married couples.
For my wife and I who have no children and make ~$90K a year, are home owners, and save for retirement vigorously, this plan helps us slightly in my estimation, but it's nothing that will change our lifestyle at all. So basically, after the standard deduction we'll be down to $66K in taxable income and that's before we take some of the other deductions. This blows a hole in the deficit and is a massive giveaway to the rich. They throw the poor and working class a couple bones to placate them, but this is a raiding of the treasury. |
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #27)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #29)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:50 PM
Johnny2X2X (16,331 posts)
32. It's not what they want.
The Republicans want only the poor and the working class to pay taxes, if they could they'd have a tax plan where anyone making over $250K a year pays zero in taxes and anyone making less than $100K a year pays 90%. That's their dream.
So this plan will leave the poor a little better off, considering who proposed it, that's good. |
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #32)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #29)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:59 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
38. That's exactly how I would put it.
A family of four will be slightly worse off
|
Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #27)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:52 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
35. One thing, they are eliminating the personal exemption, so you aren't getting a doubling of
the personal exemption + standard deduction. You are getting a little extra, but not that much.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
WinkyDink This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #33)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:12 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
40. I don't know. Every ignorant GOPer I've ever me thinks they are going to make a million dollars
next year and will benefit from tax cuts for the rich.
|
Response to Hoyt (Reply #40)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:22 PM
maryellen99 (3,743 posts)
42. They think they are getting 4K tax refunds next year nt
Response to maryellen99 (Reply #42)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:30 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
46. I wish the media spoke in term of a median and not mean.
or I wish "they" understood the difference between mean and median .
The median like more likely to be $23 or $ 96 or someother amount they can scratch their ass with. |
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:13 PM
Demsrule86 (66,409 posts)
41. I have heard that those things are non-starters.
There may not even be a tax plan.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:17 PM
Joe941 (2,848 posts)
49. I'd save quite a bit in taxes with this plan...
I've move from 25% bracket to 12% bracket. This would help me probably by a few thousand less in taxes.
|
Response to Le Gaucher (Original post)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 04:22 PM
Le Gaucher (1,547 posts)
50. My Republican Congressman is voting against it ..
I am from NJ
|