Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:56 AM Jul 2012

I had a thought this morning about R-Money's claim that Pres. Obama is attacking success..

If I were the President, and had to fend off this attack, It would sound something like this...

I have no more animosity toward Mitt Romney for being insanely rich than I would toward a rattlesnake for having poison in its teeth. But the thing that Romney would have you believe, that I disagree with, is this: that the enlightened acceptance of the nature of snakes is an acceptable justification for putting that rattlesnake in a baby's crib; and it's not. Hating a snake FOR BEING a snake is unenlightened and in some sense, seems a bit prejudicial. But that doesn't mean you do something profoundly stupid with the snake in question.

It's simple and concise, and it would let Obama tap a lot of populist emotion in BOTH parties, while still being able to counter the argument that we all just hate success and the occasional great wealth that comes with it.

Thoughts on this thought?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had a thought this morning about R-Money's claim that Pres. Obama is attacking success.. (Original Post) Volaris Jul 2012 OP
rMoney views success as Americans losing jobs and the rich getting more money...that should uponit7771 Jul 2012 #1
Let's define what Romney means by "success" ananda Jul 2012 #2
I think it's degrading to snakes. Scuba Jul 2012 #3
Your using too much logic SoutherDem Jul 2012 #4
Rewrite so a 3rd grader could understand and you have something. democrat_patriot Jul 2012 #5
All of these points are well taken. Thank you , everyone=) Volaris Jul 2012 #6
Romney equates paying taxes with shame Johonny Jul 2012 #7

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
1. rMoney views success as Americans losing jobs and the rich getting more money...that should
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:57 AM
Jul 2012

...be Obama's reply

ananda

(28,858 posts)
2. Let's define what Romney means by "success"
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:58 AM
Jul 2012

Success at bullying others.
Success at having one of the worst affect disorders ever.
Success at outsourcing jobs.
Success at profiting from bankrupting others.
Success at taking money from the government when the Olympics he was running was going under financially.

And so on ....

SoutherDem

(2,307 posts)
4. Your using too much logic
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:06 AM
Jul 2012

Plus you used words some tea baggers won't understand. Their not known for owning dictionaries you know.

democrat_patriot

(2,774 posts)
5. Rewrite so a 3rd grader could understand and you have something.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:08 AM
Jul 2012

It's gotta be dumbed down to one sentence.

Johonny

(20,833 posts)
7. Romney equates paying taxes with shame
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jul 2012

Obama asking rich to pay a modest (but low relative to much of US history) tax increase is equal to hating success and placing shame on the rich. Obama pointing out the great USA that each of these idiots won't leave the house without a flag pin of, helps create the environment that helps Americans become successful. What sounds to this ordinary American as a U S A exceptionalism chant by Obama, to Romney sounds like Obama hates successful people. At this point you can safely assume the fault lies with Mitt Romney and not Obama. He's the one feeling the shame, not ordinary Americans. Makes you think he did something to feel guilty about?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I had a thought this morn...