Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hlthe2b

(102,132 posts)
2. they didn't; they tried to deny him and ultimately succumbed to the immense cost of defending
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:22 PM
Oct 2017

the institute against threatened bankrupting lawsuits.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
5. They should have made his appearence based on him providing security.....
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:26 PM
Oct 2017

600k is ridiculous its dumped on the taxpayers. Spencer should be made to feel uncomfortable, I'd pull the security back.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/uf-president-security-cost-spencer-speech-unfair-50567701

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
8. Which raises the question.......
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:30 PM
Oct 2017

"Why should that amount of security be necessary just so a citizen can speak in a public forum?"

mcar

(42,278 posts)
14. They are only charging him $10k for his share of security
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 01:11 PM
Oct 2017

Ridiculous. He should be charged multiples more.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
7. It is a taxpayer-
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:27 PM
Oct 2017

supported institution, so they must comply w/ a free speech request. It is unfortunate that we taxpayers have to foot the bill for all the security, but the price of freedom is high.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
10. Why do they have to pay for that security? If I wanted to hold a rock show
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:30 PM
Oct 2017

at that place I know damn well that I would have to foot the bill. It's nothing but capitulation to shrug your shoulders and write it off as the price of freedom.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
12. Capitulation to what? You are being quite unfair to make
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:35 PM
Oct 2017

such an accusation. It was not my decision to hire security. It was not my decision to allow speakers to speak and not pay for their own security. Now, we must pay to ensure the safety of all. Don't understand why you feel it necessary to insult me.

maxsolomon

(33,251 posts)
9. The entire appearance is a free-speech trap.
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 12:30 PM
Oct 2017

Intended to provoke a (perhaps) violent reaction from the Left, and therefore perpetuate a false equivalence between Fascists and anti-Fascists.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why in the world did Univ...