General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElitists
We Democrats have been called many things by our friends across the aisle, but the term elitists is the most amusing in its complete disregard for the facts. But then our GOP friends are known for disregarding facts, so no surprise there.
Were the Party that wants to ensure that everyone eligible to vote actually gets to vote. When it comes to the right to cast a ballot, we dont distinguish between those who are likely to vote for us and those who will probably vote against us. We are, and always have been, the Party that champions the right to vote above any consideration of who our fellow citizens will ultimately vote for.
We want all American children to have the best education possible, and believe that college should be affordable for all who choose to continue that education beyond high school. We do not see the poorly-educated as an easily-manipulated base that can be conveniently misled into supporting us. We see them as people who have a right to reach their full potential regardless of their financial circumstances, or their political leanings.
We want the minimum wage raised. We dont believe that those who wait tables or wash dishes for a living should be forced to work for wages that dont even cover the necessities of life. We recognize that a persons worth should be measured by their work ethic, and not by their occupation.
We want all Americans to have the same opportunities, the same chance to succeed regardless of gender, race, religion, or ethnicity. We do not see those who are different as being somehow unworthy of being an integral part of the whole. We welcome those differences as a source of our nations strength, not as a weakness to be vilified.
We want stronger social safety nets that assist the hungry and the homeless. We do not put our own individual desires above the needs of those who require a helping hand. We believe that bettering the lives of every individual leads to the betterment of all.
We want our LGBT brothers and sisters to have the same rights as everyone else. We do not see rights afforded to them as somehow diminishing anyone elses rights in any way.
We want wealthy individuals and corporations to pay their fair share of taxes. We do not view tax-cuts for certain individuals and companies as a position to be aspired to we see it as a shirking of responsibility to our nation as a whole.
We want all Americans to have access to affordable healthcare and were not afraid to pay higher taxes so that those in need of medical care can have it, even if its on our dime. We understand that the welfare of our fellow citizens contributes to the welfare of all citizens.
Elitists look down their noses at those they perceive to be beneath them. They seek to marginalize them, ignore them, and ultimately dismiss them as unimportant and unworthy of consideration. They dont stand up for them; they dont fight their fight.
Elitists put their own concerns above the needs of those they see as not them. They see those who are disadvantaged by virtue of financial circumstances or anything else as worthy of scorn.
Of all the labels that have been attached to Democrats, the term elitists is the most laughable, the most ridiculous-on-its-face, the most ludicrous application of a term to a Party that continues to represent the exact opposite of elitism.
The latte-sipping, Christian-hating, designer-wearing atheist who demands the best table in the latest in restaurant stereotype of we elitist Democrats is as credible as the concept of a 6,000-year-old flat earth.
Look at which party is looking down their noses at the working poor, the different, the homeless, the sick, the poverty-stricken and tell me again who the elitists are.
And while youre at it, you can tell me again how the Democratic Party no longer stands for the hard-working middle-class another myth currently spewed out of the asshole of some RW think-tank that hopes to convince the easily-led.
Jack-o-Lantern
(966 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)The movements ultimate goal is capitalism free from government interference, and a government essentially stripped to maintaining law and order and national defense. Its adherents want to privatize most public services, especially public schools and Social Security. They have adopted the language of conservatism, and have successfully hijacked the Republican Party in the process, but they are not conservative in the traditional sense. Most people would not support the movements extreme libertarian vision if its adherents didnt couch it in appeals to a benign personal freedom.
The final prescription of Buchanans career was constitutional revolutiona rewriting of the rulebook to unleash free-market fundamentalism and prevent majorities of voters from ever being able to effect change. This revolution would turn the Constitutions checks and balances into locks and bolts, and can be heard in present-day calls by Republican governors and legislators for a convention of the states to amend the Constitution.
This is a cause that has its own morality, and its a morality that is foreign to most of us, MacLean says. We need to understand that they truly believe that if people need to die to teach full self-reliance from government, then thats a price that theyre willing to pay.
Caliman73
(11,728 posts)That is essential to the hypocrisy of the libertarians and conservative billionaires. They only want government large enough to protect their interests, their property, and nothing else.
Self reliance my ass. They were the same whiny bastards that cried for the Army to come save them from Native Americans when they were stealing their land, then claiming that they made it on their own and didn't need no stinkin government telling them not to poison the towns water supply with their mills and oil wells.
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)"In Defense of Elitism" If nothing else, the framing was enlightening to me.
Bladewire
(381 posts)I'm high 🦄
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)until the last few years. When did it get started?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)They started to pretend that the Very very very rich were, in fact, the champions of the very very poor..
(Oh, and I understand there's this great bridge available in NY)
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)"You CAN fool some of the people ALL of the time". This applies when the country has so many fools. I wish they were the ones who stayed home on election day.
Caliman73
(11,728 posts)There were charges against Adlai Stevenson being a pointy headed intellectual and charges against "Northern Liberal elites" since the 1950's and 60's.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Those were Republicans without fur coats. They used to be a (good) thing.
That was the last time they weren't an elitist party.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,990 posts)Good piece, Nance. Our side has yet to figure out how to neutralize the Luntz effect on politics
That crowd has done a better marketing job in framing the debate.
They have redefined terms, and no matter how wrong, have become accepted in the mainstream
This might be our start, by taking back the definition of elite, and repainting the image. Make it clear that THEY are the elitists and that many of them are from the coast, making them the dreaded coastal elites.
Frank Luntz is hardly a genius! Where are our counter-messaging marketers?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Education is elite.. (before the institution of the Public School System)..
The erosion of Public support for all our schools has reignited the divide. If you know stuff by studying it, you are suspect.
Prof, you elite "know-stuff" guy!
ProfessorGAC
(64,990 posts)Me and my silly extra education!
Glad you pointed out my wasted time!
Of course, I'm kidding and agreeing with you wholly
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)A platform at odds with reality.
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)HAB911
(8,879 posts)Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)nt
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... for the inspiration that prompted it!
dalton99a
(81,433 posts)The Wizard
(12,541 posts)and commentary improve my day and validate my belief that I'm not in an alternate Universe.
mcar
(42,300 posts)onto us.
Gothmog
(145,086 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)If Democrats are elitists, then just look at the net worth of Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump. Or Barack Obama vs Mitt Romney or John McCain (ok the latter married into money).
The only person I know IRL who I'd consider an elitist is my brother in law. He works for a conservative think tank. His elitism first hit me during the Katrina aftermath. HE said "well they should have just gotten in their cars and left" not realizing that some people can't afford cars. It was a very 'let them eat cake' moment. In the years since, he's made fun of me because I don't lease late model cars, choose not to buy a house (even if I won the powerball), and not keeping up with the trends in fine dining restaurants (my tastes are more McDonald's). Every time I see him he asks me why I don't have a passport and says people should always have one (I will get one if international travel is in the near future, but I'm not spending the $$ when it is not. My drivers license works fine as an ID). I also remember him complaining that his trip to Spain was a coach ticket not first class.
Yet Democrats are the elitists....
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)driving elitist when i supported obama back in '08. i've never been in a starbucks or had a latte, and i still drive my '05 mazda miata.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thank you!
ismnotwasm
(41,975 posts)Thank you
gademocrat7
(10,654 posts)Again, spot on NanceGreggs.
oasis
(49,370 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)have always thrived on Big Money and Big Lies.