HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Has anyone considered tha...

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 07:43 AM

Has anyone considered that Chump might have been on speaker phone at the meeting?

That would have given the cover of not physically being present, while allowing him to know exactly what was going on and control the conversation.

28 replies, 3703 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply Has anyone considered that Chump might have been on speaker phone at the meeting? (Original post)
MoonRiver Jul 17 OP
madokie Jul 17 #1
MoonRiver Jul 17 #2
PatSeg Jul 17 #17
Achilleaze Jul 17 #3
wishstar Jul 17 #4
MoonRiver Jul 17 #5
The_jackalope Jul 17 #8
MoonRiver Jul 17 #9
malaise Jul 17 #23
thesquanderer Jul 17 #19
MoonRiver Jul 17 #20
Eyeball_Kid Jul 18 #25
jpak Jul 17 #6
MoonRiver Jul 17 #7
L. Coyote Jul 17 #10
MoonRiver Jul 17 #11
The Blue Flower Jul 17 #12
MoonRiver Jul 17 #13
TEB Jul 17 #14
Eyeball_Kid Jul 18 #26
WePurrsevere Jul 17 #15
MoonRiver Jul 17 #16
Eyeball_Kid Jul 17 #18
dawnie51 Jul 17 #21
stopbush Jul 17 #22
Nitram Jul 17 #24
WhiteTara Jul 18 #27
Not Ruth Jul 18 #28

Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 07:46 AM

1. They ain't smart enough to think of that

would be my guess. These mofo's think they can and they do anything they want without thinking. IMO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madokie (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 07:48 AM

2. So do you think he was physically there?

Would explain why his lawyer thinks SS should have intervened. Lying about that would REALLY be stupid, but typical for these bottom feeders.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madokie (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:41 AM

17. But that is the sort of thing that Trump

has been known to do in the past in his businesses, eavesdrop on people. He might have been "listening" through a speaker phone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:00 AM

3. Oh my! republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief on the speaker phone

while perched upon his infamous golden throne. How republican is that?

Can't wait till the National Enquirer breaks the story about the republican traitors to America and their Gang GitTogether with the russians.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:04 AM

4. Yes, several bloggers have presented that theory, because Manafort was using his phone

Allegedly Manafort was present for entire meeting and not speaking himself but using his phone

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wishstar (Reply #4)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:09 AM

5. Mueller needs to subpoena that phone,

and do a forensic analysis. I'm sure they deleted any suspicious calls, but forensics can find them again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:22 AM

8. IC sources are reported to have said that Manafort's phone was hacked - hot-miked.

As were Kislyak's and - with his permission - Comey's. If so, many conversations in their vicinity have been recorded.

This looks like it's going to be another Horrible, No God, Very Bad Week for Don the Con. They're all going to jail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The_jackalope (Reply #8)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:26 AM

9. LOCK THEM UP!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #9)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:34 AM

23. Ditto

LOCK THEM UP!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:03 AM

19. Simpler than forensic analysis... phone bills usually list the calls. (n/t)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thesquanderer (Reply #19)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:19 AM

20. Good point!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wishstar (Reply #4)

Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:47 AM

25. The phones of the Russians at the meeting were hot-miked. Intelligence agencies have it all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:19 AM

6. Yes - and every asshole that was there should be asked that under oath

yup

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Reply #6)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:20 AM

7. Absolutely, and soon!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Reply #6)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:29 AM

10. Probably been done already by Mueller.

We don't know who has been interviewed so far, but i heard Jared has been. Maybe this meet means he needs another interview though.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to L. Coyote (Reply #10)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 08:30 AM

11. Interesting. The plot thickens!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:12 AM

12. If the Secret Service was involved, candidate drumpf was there

Thrown out there by Bill Palmer. Did Sekulow spill the beans?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Blue Flower (Reply #12)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:17 AM

13. "Loose lips sink ships"

So many cliches apply to this clown car.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Blue Flower (Reply #12)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:19 AM

14. Makes sense

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Blue Flower (Reply #12)

Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:49 AM

26. I've read reports that indicate that "John Barron" was present at the meeting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:19 AM

15. It's Trump's nature to micromanage EVERYTHING...

His son would definitely know that so I'm almost positive Dolt45 was there, if not physically, then on a phone/listening in.

Junior is just so very eager to please his father (the psychology of which I won't get into) to NOT let him know about this possible 'score' beforehand.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WePurrsevere (Reply #15)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:23 AM

16. I completely agree.

There is NO way he wasn't in that meeting, one way or another. We just need the evidence, which I'm sure is out there. The gang who can't shoot straight has it, and the weakest link will spill the beans. Not sure if the weakest link is Kushner or Junior. Maybe both.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 09:43 AM

18. Maybe, but "John Barron" was at the meeting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:23 AM

21. Anyone who thinks Jr. does ANYTHING......

on his own is delusional. Dump is a control freak, and there is no way he would let either of his male spawn speak for him. And as for the daughter, not much more. He was supposed to be in thrall to her, and we now see that she has very little influence on his actions, if she in fact even speaks up to him. The son in law seems to be the chosen one, which will make it all the sweeter when he turns Dump out to the authorities. I believe Dump himself was in the meeting; there's a reason that any and all meetings were in Trump Tower; Dump has total control of the tower, and it's comings and goings. That's what he demands, total control, that how he's done business for 40 years. If he wasn't right there in the room, he was on the other end of Manafort's phone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:30 AM

22. Yes. I mentioned that the other day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Mon Jul 17, 2017, 10:37 AM

24. Yes, it's been suggested by more than one observer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:50 AM

27. It's been reported that Manafort was

on his phone for the entire meeting. The report made it sound like he was barely paying attention to what was going on, but it sounds like he was on the phone with the OrangeAnus.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Original post)

Tue Jul 18, 2017, 10:53 AM

28. Trump was probably there in person

It is his building

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread