Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:05 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
Did you hear Ari just say on Rachel that Rosenstein can't oversee the Mueller investigation?
At the very end - last MINUTE - Rachel was interviewing Ari (he's one of the MSNBC legal guys) about T being investigated for obstruction- and he said that since Rosenstein was involved in the Comey firing, he will have to recuse himself from that investigation... Rachel basically said wait, what? and then they went to Lawrence. She told Lawrence she wished she had a lot more time with Ari and that this was completely new to her.
|
32 replies, 4273 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | OP |
elleng | Jun 2017 | #1 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #3 | |
elleng | Jun 2017 | #8 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #7 | |
elleng | Jun 2017 | #10 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #11 | |
elleng | Jun 2017 | #13 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #15 | |
GeoWilliam750 | Jun 2017 | #29 | |
elleng | Jun 2017 | #30 | |
NightWatcher | Jun 2017 | #2 | |
a kennedy | Jun 2017 | #5 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #6 | |
SHRED | Jun 2017 | #4 | |
dixiegrrrrl | Jun 2017 | #32 | |
oasis | Jun 2017 | #9 | |
BigmanPigman | Jun 2017 | #20 | |
moonscape | Jun 2017 | #12 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #14 | |
moonscape | Jun 2017 | #16 | |
FreepFryer | Jun 2017 | #17 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #18 | |
FreepFryer | Jun 2017 | #19 | |
Amaryllis | Jun 2017 | #21 | |
Generic Brad | Jun 2017 | #26 | |
AntiFascist | Jun 2017 | #22 | |
marylandblue | Jun 2017 | #24 | |
FreepFryer | Jun 2017 | #25 | |
MedusaX | Jun 2017 | #27 | |
FreepFryer | Jun 2017 | #28 | |
Patterson | Jun 2017 | #31 | |
marylandblue | Jun 2017 | #23 |
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:08 PM
elleng (116,446 posts)
1. Yes, Rosenstein will have to recuse,
giving the 'supervising' job at DOJ to Rachel Brand.
Former Bush official Rachel Brand takes over No. 3 position at Justice Dept. 'In some ways, Rachel Lee Brand followed a traditional path toward a high-ranking position in the Justice Department: an internship with her senator, an Ivy League law school, a Supreme Court clerkship, a legal job in the White House. But Brand’s journey to becoming the first woman to serve as associate attorney general, the Justice Department’s third-highest-ranking official, had some unconventional features. The daughter and granddaughter of Dutch dairy farmers, she and her three siblings grew up in small-town Iowa. Seven years ago, when she went home to visit her family during the tulip festival in Pella, Brand donned her wooden shoes and joined 2,604 others in the town as it set the Guinness world record for the largest Dutch “klompen” dance. Brand, 44, who was confirmed this month, now has to navigate a much more difficult dance as she takes the reins of what is considered by many the most politically challenging job in the Justice Department. As associate attorney general, Brand manages the lawyers who litigate civil rights, environmental and antitrust issues.'>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/former-bush-official-rachel-brand-takes-over-no-3-position-at-justice-dept/2017/05/25/75e3aa80-40bb-11e7-8c25-44d09ff5a4a8_story.html |
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:10 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
3. Rachel acted like this was completely new to her...
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #3)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:13 PM
elleng (116,446 posts)
8. Yes, Ari mentioned it a few minutes before end of the show.
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:13 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
7. How is it you knew this before Rachel! Or that she didn't know. She is so often first on this stuff.
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #7)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:14 PM
elleng (116,446 posts)
10. I sure as heck didn't know it, Amaryllis,
just 'reporting' what I just heard!
![]() |
Response to elleng (Reply #10)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:16 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
11. Oh, okay...I was like, how could Elleng know this before RACHEL? The top Russiagate
expert! I misinterpreted your post...
|
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #11)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:18 PM
elleng (116,446 posts)
13. HAD I kept up with things as Ari does,
it's REMOTELY possible I could have figured it out, but I didn't; I'm just a RETIRED attorney!
|
Response to elleng (Reply #13)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:23 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
15. Well...it is logical that he would have to recuse himself...I still wonder why Rachel seemed
so surprised.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #1)
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 12:55 AM
GeoWilliam750 (2,405 posts)
29. Not sure that this is good news
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Brand
"Brand is the chairman of the Federalist Society's Litigation Practice Group and co-chair of the American Bar Association Administrative Law Section's Government Information and Right to Privacy Committee." |
Response to GeoWilliam750 (Reply #29)
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 12:57 AM
elleng (116,446 posts)
30. I think she'll do her job properly,
regardless of her assumed politics. That's usually what we bureaucrats do.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:10 PM
NightWatcher (39,329 posts)
2. She could've done a whole segment on that little tidbit
Response to NightWatcher (Reply #2)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:11 PM
a kennedy (25,304 posts)
5. Got that tidbit 10 minutes before her show was over. eom
Response to NightWatcher (Reply #2)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:12 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
6. That's what she and Lawrence both indicated...like Ari just had to get that out before Rachel
handed it off to Lawrence.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:10 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
4. I thought recusal was a choice?
Response to SHRED (Reply #4)
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 10:03 PM
dixiegrrrrl (59,965 posts)
32. It's a choice until it becomes a forced recusal.
But he wrote and signed Comey's firing letter, so no way could he avoid recusal.
I am surprised that Rachel did not know this, it has been in the MSM for a few weeks now. |
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:13 PM
oasis (48,626 posts)
9. Haven't heard Alan Dershowitz chime in with his two cents all day.
Trump must really be behind the eight ball.
![]() |
Response to oasis (Reply #9)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:37 PM
BigmanPigman (46,378 posts)
20. Good! No wonder I was able to stay on one channel. I did not realize it until now.
Whenever I hear him (like Kellyanne, Jeffrey Lord, etc) my blood pressure skyrockets.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:16 PM
moonscape (3,816 posts)
12. I thought that was already out there. Rosenstein had said that
if Mueller said he should recuse himself, he would - or something like that. Don't remember exactly. It was a week or so ago if memory serves, though I've lost all track of time since 11/8!
It seemed clear then, that it would be related to obstruction because of the memo and whatever related conversations Rosenstein and 45 had. I rather assumed it would get to that point because obstruction seemed like an obvious avenue to go down. |
Response to moonscape (Reply #12)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:19 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
14. Well...that makes sense. But Rachel sure seemed surprised. I wonder why?
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #14)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:24 PM
moonscape (3,816 posts)
16. Maybe because it hadn't gotten to that point yet? Mueller questioned
Rosenstein already, and my sense was that it depended how what he learned from Rosenstein started fitting in with other parts. We don't know what the two of them discussed, and certainly neither of them would leak. But since Mueller has now expanded the people he's talking to, thus the leaks, it returns to that issue. Ari can't know for certain, but legally Rosenstein can't be both a witness and oversee the investigation.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #14)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:25 PM
FreepFryer (6,796 posts)
17. I believe Ari's point was that if Rosenstein is indeed a witness for Mueller...
...(as expected) he will have to recuse himself from overseeing the investigation, as a prosecutor should avoid being the sole interviewer of a witness, being alone with a witness, or otherwise becoming an essential witness to any aspect of that investigation.
|
Response to FreepFryer (Reply #17)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:28 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
18. THat's what I got too. Still, I thought there must be something new about it given both
Rachel and Lawrence's reaction.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #18)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:35 PM
FreepFryer (6,796 posts)
19. I think it's because we have been focusing on Rosenstein being the empowered one to fire Mueller...
...and this would mean he couldn't oversee the investigation. However, we oughtn't assume that Rosenstein would also recuse from managing Mueller, given Sessions' claim that he could still fire Comey despite his own (self-)recusal.
|
Response to FreepFryer (Reply #19)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
Amaryllis (9,436 posts)
21. Well, we know what Rachel will be discussing tomorrow! And likely will have Ari on again.
I like him. He did a good job when she was out.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #14)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:12 PM
Generic Brad (13,733 posts)
26. She's extremely intelligent, but not omniscient
I don't expect her to know everything!
![]() |
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
AntiFascist (12,376 posts)
22. From what I've read, Rachel Brand had more Republican support than Democratic..
when she was confirmed. I hope she can remain non-partisan. |
Response to AntiFascist (Reply #22)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:42 PM
marylandblue (12,344 posts)
24. She's very conservative, but I don't get the sense she's a Robert Bork
Response to marylandblue (Reply #24)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:49 PM
FreepFryer (6,796 posts)
25. Boente is the one who makes me nervous. President Obama removed him from the line of succession...
...for a good reason I'm sure (wish I knew)! Trump's EO of March 31, placing the AG from EDNC in the line, is interesting.
(warning, whitehouse web site link: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/03/31/presidential-executive-order-providing-order-succession-within ) |
Response to FreepFryer (Reply #25)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:37 PM
MedusaX (1,129 posts)
27. I have read that It was a ruse...Obama did it to make Boente attractive to *45...betting that *45
Would un-do the EO and put Boente back in the line.
But who knows... |
Response to MedusaX (Reply #27)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 11:51 PM
FreepFryer (6,796 posts)
28. If so, wow. Just wow :) (n/t)
Response to marylandblue (Reply #24)
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 01:06 AM
Patterson (1,347 posts)
31. Not much chance of that.
Response to Amaryllis (Original post)
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:41 PM
marylandblue (12,344 posts)
23. I think Rachel was surprised because the WaPo article came out late this afternoon
And it was a busy news day. A lot to digest at once.
|