Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kentuck

(111,082 posts) Thu May 25, 2017, 08:01 PM May 2017

Is it espionage?

Or is it something less sinister?

Did they just make some bad decisions out of stupidity or ignorance? Is that a legitimate excuse?

How many in the White House and the Congress are involved in this conspiracy?

Why the lack of transparency?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is it espionage? (Original Post) kentuck May 2017 OP

Too many. n/t GP6971 May 2017 #1

99% would be a fair estimate. BigmanPigman May 2017 #2

Plenty samplegirl May 2017 #3

No, it's mainly RICO. GliderGuider May 2017 #4

The people have a right to transparency in their government. kentuck May 2017 #5

GP6971

(31,141 posts)

1. Too many. n/t

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu May 25, 2017, 08:07 PM

May 2017

BigmanPigman

(51,585 posts)

2. 99% would be a fair estimate.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu May 25, 2017, 08:08 PM

May 2017

samplegirl

(11,476 posts)

3. Plenty

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu May 25, 2017, 08:10 PM

May 2017

of people.

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)

4. No, it's mainly RICO.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu May 25, 2017, 08:12 PM

May 2017

Essentially the Russians bought the entire GOP - and through them the US political process - for chump change.

The Republican party is a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization.

kentuck

(111,082 posts)

5. The people have a right to transparency in their government.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Thu May 25, 2017, 08:14 PM

May 2017

They need to know if there are any external interests involved in our country?

Reply to this discussion