Thu May 11, 2017, 02:53 PM
nikibatts (2,198 posts)
LISTEN UP! There is nothing left to do except put Trump under oath and question him.
Either before Congress or by the FBI in the Oval Office. Bill Clinton was required to do it.
|
10 replies, 1919 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
nikibatts | May 2017 | OP |
underpants | May 2017 | #1 | |
enough | May 2017 | #2 | |
OnDoutside | May 2017 | #8 | |
Blaukraut | May 2017 | #3 | |
Feathery Scout | May 2017 | #4 | |
democratisphere | May 2017 | #5 | |
3catwoman3 | May 2017 | #6 | |
nikibatts | May 2017 | #7 | |
LexVegas | May 2017 | #9 | |
Vinca | May 2017 | #10 |
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 02:55 PM
underpants (169,447 posts)
1. That was a civil case
Congress can't force a President to testify.
|
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 02:55 PM
enough (12,474 posts)
2. Good idea, only one big difference. Bill Clinton knew what being under oath means. NT
Response to enough (Reply #2)
Fri May 12, 2017, 07:46 AM
OnDoutside (18,933 posts)
8. Trump seemed to tell some truths on those deposition videos, so maybe he knows not to screw around
under oath ?
|
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 02:55 PM
Blaukraut (5,541 posts)
3. Not unless they are prepared to charge him with perjury
because he will lie like a rug. Trump is incapable of telling the truth about anything.
|
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 02:56 PM
Feathery Scout (218 posts)
4. That will do nothing....Trump pays no consequences as long as Congress backs him
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 03:04 PM
democratisphere (17,235 posts)
5. And under oath drumpf won't tell one lie after another?
drumpf is a desperado trying to save his own ass.
|
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Thu May 11, 2017, 03:25 PM
3catwoman3 (19,510 posts)
6. Do you think he even knows...
...when he is lying? It seems as if he believes that everything he says is true just because he says it, even if he said just the opposite shortly before.
Would being under oath even mean anything to him? |
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Fri May 12, 2017, 07:28 AM
nikibatts (2,198 posts)
7. We need legal perjury to go after him and make it stick.
Response to nikibatts (Original post)
Fri May 12, 2017, 07:52 AM
Vinca (48,227 posts)
10. It would make no difference whether he was under oath or not under oath.
He's off his rocker and does and says whatever warped inner Donald tells him to. I doubt he can distinguish between truth and lie anymore.
|