Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:12 PM
COLGATE4 (14,732 posts)
Oh Shit! The secret of ACA has finally gotten found out!
The Morans over at FR are now having a hissyfit since they 'discovered' that the 'real' reason for ACA is so the gubmint' kin git a list of all yourn names who has gunz and then take 'em away!!
Ammoland ^ | June 28, 2012 | Ammoland.com Posted on Friday, June 29, 2012 3:02:14 PM by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost Led by feckless chief Justice John Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court today upheld the ObamaCare law by a 5-to-4 decision, with Roberts voting with liberals Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan. While the decision means many harmful things for the American public, the Second Amendment community remains greatly affected, as the law requires Americans’ medical information to be culled and entered into a national database. Centralizing these medical records will allow the FBI to troll a list of Americans for ailments such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to deny them their gun rights, in the same way that the Veterans Administration has already denied more than 150,000 veterans their right to bear arms.
|
22 replies, 3697 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
COLGATE4 | Jun 2012 | OP |
hifiguy | Jun 2012 | #1 | |
deutsey | Jun 2012 | #2 | |
Siwsan | Jun 2012 | #3 | |
pinboy3niner | Jun 2012 | #4 | |
BumRushDaShow | Jun 2012 | #5 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2012 | #6 | |
Arugula Latte | Jun 2012 | #7 | |
COLGATE4 | Jun 2012 | #14 | |
muriel_volestrangler | Jun 2012 | #22 | |
Tigress DEM | Jun 2012 | #8 | |
safeinOhio | Jun 2012 | #9 | |
lpbk2713 | Jun 2012 | #10 | |
loyalsister | Jun 2012 | #11 | |
COLGATE4 | Jun 2012 | #15 | |
loyalsister | Jun 2012 | #17 | |
SoutherDem | Jun 2012 | #12 | |
Hoyt | Jun 2012 | #13 | |
treestar | Jun 2012 | #16 | |
Comrade_McKenzie | Jun 2012 | #18 | |
quaker bill | Jun 2012 | #19 | |
spin | Jun 2012 | #20 | |
Dirty Socialist | Jun 2012 | #21 |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:14 PM
hifiguy (33,688 posts)
1. Down the rabbit hole straight into the
Twilight World of Total Paranoia.
![]() ![]() |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:17 PM
deutsey (20,166 posts)
2. Genuises, they are
![]() |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:17 PM
Siwsan (24,673 posts)
3. Is there ANY issue they don't equate to gun control??
There are days I feel like I'm suffering from PTSD, just from working in the corporate world.
Besides, I believe it's already required for medical personnel to report ANY gunshot wounds - self inflicted or otherwise. A slightly better indication of gun activit. |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:21 PM
pinboy3niner (53,339 posts)
4. The FBI doesn't need their medical records to prove they're crazy
They're flaunting it on Facebook and all over the internets.
![]() |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:26 PM
BumRushDaShow (112,157 posts)
5. They were overdue with this wedge issue
after they tried and failed in their war on Women, Gays, and God.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:33 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
6. Oh cool...
they got them secret gun'mint plan, is this part of Gunrunner and Fast and Furious?
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:35 PM
Arugula Latte (50,566 posts)
7. The Freeps are geniuses. GENIUSES I tell you! This one figured our Muslim Takeover mission:
"The New World Order socialists have paved the way for Muslims to take over large areas of our country."
Folks, it's over. They're on to us. |
Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:16 PM
COLGATE4 (14,732 posts)
14. Shhh. They don't know that our planned takeover
is to be done by MUSLINS, not Muslims...
|
Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #7)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:17 PM
muriel_volestrangler (99,524 posts)
22. I think I found an even worse one frmo that thread:
It was pretty much over for freedom after the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913, in which Uncle Sam was now privy and partner to every dollar you earn.
Right after that they no longer needed the tax revenue from alcohol sales (made up about 45% of total federal receipts at the time), they passed an amendment outlawing alcohol in 1920, coincidentally the same year they expanded the right to vote to women. So that genius thinks you should be able to run a government on booze taxes, and obviously looks on women voting with deep suspicion ... ![]() |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:39 PM
Tigress DEM (7,887 posts)
8. With HIPPA, not likely... but it isn't actually a bad idea.
The FBI having a national database that at least tracks criminals across state lines in an effective way that is.
I'm sorry to have to say this, but someone with serious mental health issues shouldn't NEED to have easy access to a gun. I sympathize though. Since a person can't get hospitalized to deal with their issues unless they meet the criteria of being " a danger to self or others " then gun ownership is often an effective means to proving oneself medically eligible for needed treatment. I'm sure most of those veterans just want to go out and hunt. Get away from stress or get in some target practice to feel that sense of empowerment. But at 3am when the PTSD sets up a choke hold, having a gun handy could be a fatal mistake. Then there's the fact that about 80% of the population has faced serious depression and doesn't need instant access to firearms because that is pretty much a real plan and not just a cry for help and the permanent solution for temporary problems is in effect before someone can be talked off the ledge so to speak. Needless to say the level of anger among the gun toting set has led to so much more murder and mayhem that even as a usually calm and prudent liberal, I've thought of getting a gun myself. NOT to defend against corrupt government agencies that might beat down my door, but to deal with the rethugs who are packing heat and itching to use it. But I have grandkids and I've never wanted to have dangerous things around them. So the thinking goes back and forth. Which is more dangerous? Having a gun in the house and knowing how to use it or not having it when some raving right winger shows up at my door? Ah, not going to happen. They are afraid to come to my neighborhood. Guess I really don't need a gun after all. Ramble, ramble. Tig |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:41 PM
safeinOhio (30,373 posts)
9. I heard the NRA has given
the House republicans a list of NRA members to use in an emergence.
![]() |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:44 PM
lpbk2713 (42,085 posts)
10. Must be a worm planted in their ear by OxyRush or Han-nutty.
They don't usually know what to think or say until they get the word from their favorite RW Media Hatemonger. |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:46 PM
loyalsister (13,390 posts)
11. Riduculous
Even if they were the least bit accurate in the assumption about gathering names, do they want people with schizophrenia to be armed?
PTSD is a mental illness and it is no joke. It terrifies me that my dad sleeps with a loaded gun next to his bed. There was a rule of thumb in our house about not waking him up because he would either be intensely irritable and start yelling or jump up ready to fight if he was startled by it. I agree that listings about people's health (physical and mental) would be overly intrusive (and that there is no effort in the works to do so)- I am just pointing out how ridiculous their concerns are over someone with PTSD not having access to a gun. |
Response to loyalsister (Reply #11)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:19 PM
COLGATE4 (14,732 posts)
15. They're not at all concerned with anyone
with PTSD. Remember - the Rethugs are all for children, until they're born and all for soldiers until they come home with PTSD or all beat to hell. Then... silence is deafening. This is just a handy stick to beat the ACA dog with so people can empathize with the 'poor sufferers of PTSD whose gun the damned gubmint is gonna take away ( as a prelude to taking away everone elses'). False concern, more RW bullshit.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #15)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:57 PM
loyalsister (13,390 posts)
17. I hope they keep bring this BS up
I think even some die hard republicans will want to distance themselves from these conspiracy nuts.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:46 PM
SoutherDem (2,307 posts)
12. NRA
Neuronic Right-wing Activist.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:46 PM
Hoyt (54,770 posts)
13. Thank god those worthless fools are at least good for laughs.
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:20 PM
treestar (81,537 posts)
16. I can agree with the right to bear arms to an extent
Or at least understand the view, but what would be wrong with keeping people with PTSD from having them? They might shoot themselves.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:58 PM
Comrade_McKenzie (2,526 posts)
18. People with mental disorders SHOULD be disarmed...
I hope to see this become law.
Thanks Freepers! |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:07 PM
quaker bill (8,199 posts)
19. Absolutely everything is about their ****ing guns.
Any time that anyone does anything in government, it is all really all about taking their guns. Personally I hope they just go broke buying them and stashing ammo for them. Then may they rust in peace.
|
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:11 PM
spin (17,493 posts)
20. The government probably already knows who has firearms ...
ever hear of data mining?
Counterterrorism Technology: Broadening the Scope of Security Technology |
Response to COLGATE4 (Original post)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:16 PM
Dirty Socialist (3,075 posts)
21. Maybe The Gubmint' SHOULD Take Them Away
Paranoid crackpots shouldn't be allowed to own guns, IMO.
|