Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kaotic

(83 posts)
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 10:39 PM Mar 2017

WH estimates worse than CBO's...54M would be uninsured in 2026 under GOP plan

unreal...


The analysis found that under the American Health Care Act the coverage losses would include 17 million for Medicaid, six million in the individual market and three million in employer-based plans.

A total of 54 million individuals would be uninsured in 2026 under the GOP plan, according to the White House analysis. That’s nearly double the number projected under current law.

“We disagree strenuously with the report that was put out,” HHS Secretary Tom Price told reporters about the CBO after leaving a Cabinet meeting with Trump at the White House. “It’s just not believable is what we would suggest.” While serving as the House Budget Committee chairman, Price had a role in appointing the current head of the CBO who is a conservative economist.

But that effort to discredit CBO’s projections is undermined by the fact that the White House’s own analysis reached a similar — and slightly bleaker — conclusion about how the GOP plan would increase the number of uninsured Americans.


http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/obamacare-uninsured-white-house-236019
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WH estimates worse than CBO's...54M would be uninsured in 2026 under GOP plan (Original Post) Kaotic Mar 2017 OP
They probably think it's great! The more marybourg Mar 2017 #1
I disagree. Foo Fighter Mar 2017 #5
This seems about right superpatriotman Mar 2017 #2
Proof that the CBO estimate is wrong bigly. nt NCjack Mar 2017 #3
Here is the upside. Wellstone ruled Mar 2017 #4
They can't say CBO is too high Hamlette Mar 2017 #6

Foo Fighter

(743 posts)
5. I disagree.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 11:31 PM
Mar 2017

I think they're not happy about it because they missed their goal. If they had their way, the entire populace would be w/o insurance. Well, except for, of course, the top 1%, whose premiums would be paid for by taxes* on the 99%. That, in their view, would be a fair and equitable system.

*The rest of our taxes would go for the military. At least it seems they're off to a good start for achieving that goal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WH estimates worse than C...