HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » ERIC vs CrossCheck

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 12:17 PM

ERIC vs CrossCheck

We all know the issues with CrossCheck. It is a poorly designed program that results in massive "matches" due to limited data analysis. ERIC, a PEW program, uses much more robust data. It is currently used in 21 states. One of which, Washington, used it to increase voter registration. I think it is a great alternative to CrossCheck, a program run by

http://www.ericstates.org/images/documents/ERIC_Membership_Summary_v1.0.pdf

http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/analysis/2016/03/09/eric-mailings-encourage-voter-registration-in-washington-state

2 replies, 1685 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply ERIC vs CrossCheck (Original post)
Phoenix61 Jan 2017 OP
2naSalit Jan 2017 #1
Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #2

Response to Phoenix61 (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 12:26 PM

1. Some context and a link would be a good idea here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 2naSalit (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 12:31 PM

2. Thanks!

I meant to include the links. Caffeine hasn't kicked in yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread