Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Report1212

(661 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:10 AM Jun 2012

Alcohol Prohibition “Worked,” According To DEA Report, Released With Police Union Lobby

This is crazy


---


In reaction to the almost comical viral videos this week of Congressmen Jared Polis (D-CO) and Steve Cohen (D-TN) grilling the DEA chief Michele Leonhart over her agency’s marijuana policies, Republic Report took a look at the DEA’s official policy papers on the subject.

We found that the agency released a report along with a police union in 2010 detailing the many reasons why we should celebrate America’s experience with alcohol prohibition. A section devoted to “Popular Myths About Drug Legalization” claims that alcohol prohibition was wildly popular and that the ban on alcohol consumption had nothing to do with the spread of mob:

Read more: http://www.republicreport.org/2012/dea-prohibition-worked/

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alcohol Prohibition “Worked,” According To DEA Report, Released With Police Union Lobby (Original Post) Report1212 Jun 2012 OP
They just can't tell the truth about anything, can they? Fozzledick Jun 2012 #1
Jim Rome's Manual Buzzer Dirty Socialist Jun 2012 #2
A 100% fact-free zone hifiguy Jun 2012 #3
I know Aerows Jun 2012 #5
"Prohibition lowered consumption" Aerows Jun 2012 #4
I don't find it unreasonable to say that prohibition lowered overall consumption... OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #9
It IS a fact though Aerows Jun 2012 #22
yeah, overall the DEA is a sack of lying cheese-dicks. OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #23
Maybe it did. lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #30
Can't or won't? If it isn't in their best interest to tell the truth, they won't. SammyWinstonJack Jun 2012 #6
The DEA is just a parasite... nebenaube Jun 2012 #7
The DEA is un-American, and we need to say that as frequently and loudly as possible. backscatter712 Jun 2012 #25
EVERY 'government' agency is in REGULATORY CAPTURE. Corporations OWN them now. Huey P. Long Jun 2012 #8
Like they say on Boardwalk Empire: 'Make a Law. Make a Business.' Octafish Jun 2012 #10
LOL The local source of alcohol in my town was in a house I rented years later. The bathtub was jwirr Jun 2012 #11
The President of the United States appointed Michele Leonhart DefenseLawyer Jun 2012 #12
Hard to argue with that assessment hifiguy Jun 2012 #13
Its either Chimps' boys or Goldman Sachs' boys in charge. Huey P. Long Jun 2012 #16
Agreed. appal_jack Jun 2012 #15
It's kind of ironic, the police have become addicted and are in denial. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #14
Right wingers love job creation that allows them to punish others RainDog Jun 2012 #20
Spam deleted by tjwmason (MIR Team) Stephen Caddell Jun 2012 #17
who aligned with alcohol prohibition? RainDog Jun 2012 #18
Excellent analysis. hifiguy Jun 2012 #28
In further news The Iraq war was a Great Success. bahrbearian Jun 2012 #19
It worked so well they repealed it 13 years later. hobbit709 Jun 2012 #21
Lmao. Benjamin Parish Jun 2012 #24
Do these people ever listen to themselves? eShirl Jun 2012 #26
Two words: Al Capone Mz Pip Jun 2012 #27
After watching Boardwalk Empire, I have determined that Initech Jun 2012 #29
Well, it did bring some colorful terminology into the English language: Bake Jun 2012 #31
I'll have some of whatever they're smoking. LadyHawkAZ Jun 2012 #32
What a bunch of useless assholes. Rex Jun 2012 #33

Dirty Socialist

(3,252 posts)
2. Jim Rome's Manual Buzzer
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:21 AM
Jun 2012

[link:

|]
I'm calling bullshit on the claim prohibition didn't help spread organized crime.
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
3. A 100% fact-free zone
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:24 AM
Jun 2012

So how did Capone make the money he was imprisoned for not paying taxes on? (Yes I know that is ending a sentence with a preposition.)

Have these cretins not even watched Ken Burns' "Prohibition"?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
5. I know
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:28 AM
Jun 2012

"In his early twenties, he moved to Chicago to take advantage of a new opportunity to make money smuggling illegal alcoholic beverages into the city during Prohibition."

Every biography of Al Capone details this. The DEA is apparently terrified they will get their funding cut if marijuana is legalized so they decided to make shit up. This is the biggest heap of shit I've ever seen and flies in the face of both history and logic.

I wonder how long it took the person that dreamed this up to quit laughing long enough to finish it?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
4. "Prohibition lowered consumption"
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:24 AM
Jun 2012

No, prohibition lowered legal consumption, but people were still drinking just as much - they just didn't tell you about it because it was illegal. LMAO.

It's like saying that outlawing premarital sex would lower instances of it happening - the human race would have died out by now were that true because every damn religion on the planet attempts to discourage it..and does it work? No, we're still hear and our numbers are growing.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
9. I don't find it unreasonable to say that prohibition lowered overall consumption...
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:00 AM
Jun 2012

I think in the prohibition-era, like you stated, a great many people (possibly even a majority) didn't stop drinking one bit... they just did it more discreetly. However it would be foolish to think a large number people didn't at least drink on fewer occasions because of the legal inconvenience... or that perhaps a small percentage of very casual drinkers didn't bother with the hassle at all after it was illegal. And then there's the economics to be considered; bootleg products often carry a premium price due to the risk involved in manufactre/distribution so it's only logical that the new higher price of bootleg alcohol would see a diminished demand (if you charge more for something, fewer people will buy it).

You have to remember that there alot of people who try not to break the law becaue they wish to be considered law abiding. For people that didn't really care about booze one way or another, they may be inclined to stop consuming to avoid risk of arrest. And then you have to consider that many people only drink socially - if alcohol consuption must now be done in private they'll likely drink ALOT less because it's not their style to drink bathtub gin at home with the doors locked.

Me? I love beer. I've got a about 40+ pints in the cellar aging that I brewed myself. Prohibition would not stop me from drinking beer AT ALL since I make it myself. On the other hand, I'm pretty neutral about wine and liquor and only have some in rare social situations. If alcohol was made illegal tomorrow, I'd probably stop drinking wine and liquor altogether. By definition, prohibition would have lowered my overall consuption of alcoholic drinks.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
22. It IS a fact though
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:05 PM
Jun 2012

That it really opened the door to organized crime. I don't know why I'm shocked, though, because many of the nation's founders made their fortunes in smuggling. It's apparently a time honored tradition.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
30. Maybe it did.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:39 PM
Jun 2012

But is that really the goal? The effectiveness of prohibition in reducing consumption came at the cost of major gang crime and distrust of the police.

If the people don't agree with the laws, it breaks the social contract.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
25. The DEA is un-American, and we need to say that as frequently and loudly as possible.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:21 PM
Jun 2012

Call them what they are: traitors against liberty.

 

Huey P. Long

(1,932 posts)
8. EVERY 'government' agency is in REGULATORY CAPTURE. Corporations OWN them now.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:52 AM
Jun 2012

We cannot believe any of our departments or representitives as they do CORPORATE bidding.

The more 'illegal' in this instance, the more PROFIT and control by CORPORATIONS over the people.
More police funding, more private prison stock, more fines, fees, and payoffs.

EVERYTHING is now FOR the corporations and AGAINST the people. We are now slaves to be exploited and abused.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
11. LOL The local source of alcohol in my town was in a house I rented years later. The bathtub was
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:02 AM
Jun 2012

the gin factory. Just down the street from the local dance hall. Home was owned by a doctor.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
12. The President of the United States appointed Michele Leonhart
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:09 AM
Jun 2012

Last edited Sat Jun 23, 2012, 10:22 AM - Edit history (1)

She was a none-too-bright, Bush holdover, crazy drug-war zealot when he gave her the job. She was quite possibly the worst choice I could think of to head the DEA. I hold the President responsible for the actions of his administration and this is one he has a lot to answer for.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
13. Hard to argue with that assessment
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:16 AM
Jun 2012

I only wonder how many of the Chimp's appointees were quietly held over by this administration. I suspect it is a very large number indeed. Yeah, that's the change I voted for.

What sucks is that the POTUS can get away with this shit because millions of progressives have no place else to go and will do anything to prevent Rmoney from becoming president. I suspect we are laughed at on a regular basis by the WH inner circle.

Uncle Joe

(58,342 posts)
14. It's kind of ironic, the police have become addicted and are in denial.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:25 AM
Jun 2012


Why is this story worth highlighting on Republic Report, a blog about money in politics and the corrosive influence of special interest lobbying?

It’s notable that this pro-alcohol prohibition paper was released in conjunction with the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the umbrella organization for the many police unions and police departments across the country. As we’ve investigated in the past, police unions have become dependent on federal drug war grants, many of them targeted towards marijuana eradication, as a vital source of income.



Thanks for the thread, Report.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
20. Right wingers love job creation that allows them to punish others
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:36 AM
Jun 2012

They remind me of Zed in pulp fiction.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
18. who aligned with alcohol prohibition?
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:33 AM
Jun 2012

the religious right wing (mostly rural white protestants)

racists who opposed Italian and German immigrants

women who didn't want people to be able to make choices for themselves

corrupt politicians who always made sure they had access to alcohol themselves throughout prohibition

criminals and law enforcement whose jobs were enhanced by prohibition - no matter the general cost to society.

_______________________

what were the effects?

alcohol consumption did go down - but alcohol production led to poisoning and crime

CRIME SOARED

Corruption flourished

Class determined if you were a criminal or not, and whether you were held accountable for your actions.

The KKK was incorporated into society as "moral authority" with all the race hate that implies.

Prohibition did not make society safer, or better - so, if the goal of law is to improve society, rather than control what others do in their private lives - prohibition was a spectacular failure.

So, application of the law based upon race, class, corruption, crime, infringement upon civil liberties...

Just like prohibition of marijuana.

Now that alcohol prohibition has been lifted - we see that doing so did not destroy society - just as will be the case with re-legalizing marijuana.

Mz Pip

(27,434 posts)
27. Two words: Al Capone
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jun 2012

Prohibition lead to mob wars and some really nasty violence.

Criminalization just created a hot mess. Just like it does today with weed.

Initech

(100,060 posts)
29. After watching Boardwalk Empire, I have determined that
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:36 PM
Jun 2012

The anti booze arguments of the 1920s were really no different from the anti abortion arguments of today - both groups led the same debates and scare tactics used today. But I'm betting the DEA is saying this because lots of people made lots of money from selling illegal booze.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
31. Well, it did bring some colorful terminology into the English language:
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:23 PM
Jun 2012

Things like "speakeasy" and "bootleg."



Bake

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
33. What a bunch of useless assholes.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jun 2012

If that is possible. Keep lying and making shit up, no one is buying it...but that doesn't matter does it? Just as long as the Owners get a fat paycheck...who give a fuck about the rest of us!?!?!

The DEA - Dumbass Enforcement Agency. Dumb on purpose to make a paycheck and keep the lights on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alcohol Prohibition “Work...