General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Stunning FLOTUS Portrait To Push You Through This Damn Election
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/flotus-portrait-michelle-obama-jmuse_us_580f4fe3e4b0a03911ee90ea
Flotus~
mcar
(43,668 posts)Great job by the artist!
LisaM
(28,825 posts)I can't believe how I can "read" (or think that I can) Michelle Obama's thoughts in that picture. Thank you for finding this.
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)nicely put that is what a powerful image can do, it speaks to you.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)is exquisite.
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)I selected FLOTUS as an artistic subject because Michelle Obama represents a woman of empowerment for the black community, J. Muse explained in an email to The Huffington Post. In a world where odds are against us, she rises to the platform and takes a stand for each and every black woman or little black girl. She promotes health, wellness, and strength.
J. Muse painted Michelle as all black women and girls. She has given them hope.
True_Blue
(3,063 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)I know I'm going to get slammed - but I don't care for it.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I'm sorry to say (because I think the FLOTUS is gorgeous) this looks like she suffers from Impetigo.
sinkingfeeling
(53,406 posts)sheshe2
(88,572 posts)How many years did you study art to become one?
sinkingfeeling
(53,406 posts)Doesn't matter. I have a right to my opinion and I don't like the painting.
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)Yes, you are allowed your opinion. Thanks for coming here to dump it.
I have a BA in Fine Art. Hands on painting in several mediums. Also sculpture, drawing, woodworking and an intense study of art history.
Your critic sounds like my exes of my work, void of the passion and interpretation of the subject. He ridiculed one of mine never understanding what I had painted, yet an art critic from a large newspaper gave it high praise.
When you paint you pour your heart and soul into it as did j.muse, It was her interpretation of what Michelle means to black women and girls.
You don't have to like it, yet so sad you had to dump on it. Why can't something nice just be given a pass for a change.
sinkingfeeling
(53,406 posts)sheshe2
(88,572 posts)Kudos to you all for not letting a nice post just pass.
sinkingfeeling
(53,406 posts)sheshe2
(88,572 posts)Yet you denigrated the artist and her vision.
forest444
(5,902 posts)The day - may it be many, many years from now - that Mrs. Obama leaves us, it would be nice to see that very portrait on our postage stamps.
Hell, even on a $20 (it would be a real improvement over the current occupant, certainly).
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)Magnificent.
allan01
(1,950 posts)Hekate
(95,574 posts)William769
(56,125 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,777 posts)It seems to me that this artist is violating the photographers copywrite.
joelg
(20 posts)There are definitely copyright issues and it appears to have been projected onto the canvas. Nice young lady, I'm sure, but not art.
Neema
(1,153 posts)But yes, nice that she felt so inspired.
An art critic.
Neema
(1,153 posts)And have given (and taken) my share of critiques.
marybourg
(13,238 posts)paint by numbers. No shading; sharp delineation between colors.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)I believe this was a deliberate choice to show surface and interior.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Neema
(1,153 posts)I did things like this when I was young.
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)You just came back after a long absence according to your profile. I am so honored that you came to my thread to denigrate a young black woman's vision on what Michelle meant to her and young women of color. Her painting speaks of her passion. The bold vibrancy of her colors and brush strokes are profound and marked with beauty and an inner strength that will not be denied. Michelle has inspired them. Yet you call it paint by numbers. How trite and demeaning.
Neema
(1,153 posts)by a photograph of Michelle Obama that she decided to copy it to canvas. I did things like this many times when I was younger. Lots of young enthusiastic artists do to learn their craft. It's a wonderful way to learn technique. But you can't call it your own original artwork. That's not fair to the photographer. You have to take it further away from the original to call it your own.
If another artist took my work, ran it through a photoshop filter, projected it onto canvas and made an exact replica of that projection, then called it her own work, I would have a problem with that. Especially to profit off of it.
I don't have a problem with her, her vision, her enthusiasm, even her technical ability. And I completely understand her love of our amazing first lady and her desire to express that on canvas.
I'm sorry if my shorter answer came off as trite and demeaning. When I was in art school, "paint by numbers" was what our professors called our work when it was copied instead of interpreted. It was meant to encourage us to dig deeper.
ProfessorPlum
(11,389 posts)artists do this literally all the time.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)As there's no indication that the piece will be for sale or make any profit, what are the specific copyright problems of this first year art student's work?
Ms. Toad
(35,736 posts)Copyright grants to the original author (the photographer) the right to control reproduction of her work. It permits the author to decide if she wants her work used - for example - by a Trump supporter on a crude sign, modified to caricature FLOTUS as an ape. I hope you can understand that most photographers who take a glamorous photo of FLOTUS would not want that to happen - even though the crude sign would not be for sale or would not make any profit. The same copyright protections that may have been violated here are what allow the artist to control who copies their work, under what circumstances.
As to this instance, the photograph may be her own (no problem), she may have obtained consent (no problem), it may have been licensed generally under a license that perrmits copying and reproduction (again - no problem).
But if not, the infringement occurs when she reproduced another's work to use as the basis of her own without consent, profit or not.
sheshe2
(88,572 posts)It took you eleven years. That is just sick. 3 posts since 2005. 1 in the last 90 days on my thread. Hey Rip, glad you awoke.
Mirt!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Artists need to pay rent, too
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Or 2020 if Hillary Clinton does not run again?
LenaBaby61
(6,991 posts)Indeed
Michelle is easy on the eye anyway, so.....
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)mia
(8,426 posts)Reminds me of my Eczema.
Response to sheshe2 (Original post)
Desert805 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(306,135 posts)Mahalo, she~