Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts) Tue Jul 26, 2016, 12:51 PM Jul 2016

Do you want to know what is going to be worth a ton of money after the election?

The Donald Trump voters list.
There isn't going to be a con man or flim-flam artist in the world that wouldn't pay a fortune for it

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you want to know what is going to be worth a ton of money after the election? (Original Post) Bonhomme Richard Jul 2016 OP

TV Evangelist phone/mail list packman Jul 2016 #1

A list of millions of stupid and susceptible consumers? onehandle Jul 2016 #2

I think you can get a list of foreign dignitaries at no cost with a little Google research. randome Jul 2016 #3

packman

(16,296 posts)

1. TV Evangelist phone/mail list

Reply to Bonhomme Richard (Original post)

Tue Jul 26, 2016, 01:13 PM

Jul 2016

I can see Jim Bakker drooling over it.

I get a lot of those Praise the lord and send us money shows and Jim's is amazing - 25 min. of selling tubs of food and solar electric generators and 5 min. of Praising the Lord. Guy has no shame.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)

2. A list of millions of stupid and susceptible consumers?

Reply to Bonhomme Richard (Original post)

Tue Jul 26, 2016, 01:15 PM

Jul 2016

Pure gold.

randome

(34,845 posts)

3. I think you can get a list of foreign dignitaries at no cost with a little Google research.

Reply to Bonhomme Richard (Original post)

Tue Jul 26, 2016, 01:17 PM

Jul 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"The whole world is a circus if you know how to look at it."
Tony Randall, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao (1964)[/center][/font][hr]

Reply to this discussion