Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Obama, Reid and Pelosi keep DWS for so long? (Original Post) edhopper Jul 2016 OP
info runaway hero Jul 2016 #1
Ah, so that's why she demanded he tell her to resign or be fired notadmblnd Jul 2016 #2
Yup runaway hero Jul 2016 #3
Wow, what happened to her? liberalmuse Jul 2016 #4
She got power and it went to her head. runaway hero Jul 2016 #5
It makes me sad. liberalmuse Jul 2016 #6
This could have been completely prevented. runaway hero Jul 2016 #7
More likely she was always disposed to use power selfishly but didn't look out of the ordinary HereSince1628 Jul 2016 #12
very true. runaway hero Jul 2016 #13
DWS probably went through the metamorphisis that most Florida neo-liberal Dems go through. Baitball Blogger Jul 2016 #10
she is more horrible edhopper Jul 2016 #9
Please give to Tim Canova. runaway hero Jul 2016 #14
Why did they keep Rahm so long? Rex Jul 2016 #8
exactly runaway hero Jul 2016 #11
It was a good move. Smart, we won't be losing seats anymore. Rex Jul 2016 #16
Exactly. runaway hero Jul 2016 #17
same reason Devine and Weaver were kept by Sanders JI7 Jul 2016 #15
She did what she was ordered to do. Greybnk48 Jul 2016 #18

runaway hero

(835 posts)
1. info
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jul 2016
http://www.mediaite.com/online/report-dws-wanted-to-paint-obama-as-anti-woman-and-anti-semitic-if-ousted-as-dnc-chair/

Buried inside a Politico report about Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz‘s (D-FL) future aspirations was an interesting revelation: “When [Wasserman Schultz] sensed Obama was considering replacing her as chair in 2013, she began to line up supporters to suggest the move was both anti-woman and anti-Semitic.”

Wasserman Schultz is reportedly very much at odds with White House staffers, and rarely even speaks with President Barack Obama.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
2. Ah, so that's why she demanded he tell her to resign or be fired
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:07 PM
Jul 2016

She didn't think he would do it lest she sic her dogs on him.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
4. Wow, what happened to her?
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jul 2016

Years ago I really admired her. Was she always this power-hungry? Thank you for the link.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. More likely she was always disposed to use power selfishly but didn't look out of the ordinary
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:23 PM
Jul 2016

compared to the other ambitious people who are out there seeking office.

Then she got an office that added means and opportunity to desire

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
10. DWS probably went through the metamorphisis that most Florida neo-liberal Dems go through.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:21 PM
Jul 2016

Their ethics become fluid the more they develop social relationships for the sake of coalitioning.

I'm not sure that she didn't go willingly under the bus, knowing that she will rise again like the Phoenix after the fire subsides.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
8. Why did they keep Rahm so long?
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:16 PM
Jul 2016

They cannot always be good apples, you get a few bad ones - every administration does. Glad they are doing something about it, not that I believe it will effect the outcome of the election. HRC was going to win anyway.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
16. It was a good move. Smart, we won't be losing seats anymore.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jul 2016

The DNC can say they are above partisanship now with her exit. Transparency and fairness are good things and part of our core values.

runaway hero

(835 posts)
17. Exactly.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jul 2016

At least we agree. "Transparency and fairness" seems optional to some here. Plus we need new blood.

Greybnk48

(10,167 posts)
18. She did what she was ordered to do.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jul 2016

She got the outcome that was "desired" by the powers that be. Her job is now done.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Obama, Reid and P...