General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy I voted for Ron Paul By: Joe Scarborough
Posted for your information only. I found it interesting, maybe so will othersWhy I voted for Ron Paul
By: Joe Scarborough June 12, 2012 01:11 PM EDT
I operate on instinct. So I should not have been surprised by my own gut reaction to the absentee ballot that lay before me on the kitchen table.
I scanned the list for Republican primary candidates and let instinct take over.
Mitt Romney? Not on your life. A big government Republican who will say anything to get elected.
Rick Santorum? No way. A pro-life statist who helped George W. Bush double the national debt.
Newt Gingrich? Ideologically unmoored. A champion of liberty one day, a central planner the next.
Ron Paul? Yep. I quickly checked his name and moved on to a far more complex task: fixing my daughter a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.
After spending six months analyzing each candidates every move for three hours a day, five days a week, it never occurred to me that my decision to vote for the quirky congressman from Texas would happen as fast as a tornado whipping through an Amarillo parking lot. After all, who would vote for a candidate that criticized the killing of Osama bin Laden, blamed U.S. foreign policy for Sept. 11 and wants to abolish Social Security?
Certainly not me.
But I also would never vote for a GOP candidate who was the godfather of Obamacare, or another who added $7 trillion to Medicares debt or yet another who bashed Paul Ryan one week and venture capital the next. Faced with this truckload of big government Republicans, I cast my vote for the only candidate who spent his entire public career standing athwart history yelling stop to an ever-expanding centralized state.
While Romney was distancing himself from Ronald Reagan, Paul was fighting with Republicans to balance the budget for the first time in a generation. While Santorum was supporting an unprecedented expansion of entitlement spending, Paul was warning of a great recession that would be caused by government interference in the housing market. And while Gingrich was talking about how he would build up the federal government to push his conservative agenda, Congressman Paul spent all his waking hours focused on dismembering that big government beast.
It was the first protest vote Ive ever cast, and it felt well, it felt good. Suddenly I understood a bit better why the Ross Perot or the Pat Buchanan or the Ralph Nader voters did what they did.
They thought the system was so broken that they couldnt sit out but also couldnt stomach voting for a conventional candidate at a time of unconventional problems.
Do I think a Ron Paul presidency is ever possible? No, I dont. But I do want some of the Pauline virtues of candor and non-poll-tested conviction to play a larger role in our politics.
So now Ive cast my protest vote. It felt good.
What I really want, though, is a party and a politics thats commensurate with the problems and possibilities of the country. Well get there one day and then we can focus on progress, not protest.
A guest columnist for POLITICO, Joe Scarborough hosts Morning Joe on MSNBC and represented Floridas 1st Congressional District in the House of Representatives from 1995 to 2001.
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=D6D4C199-7388-408F-B860-605DF65407E8
MindMover
(5,016 posts)then you deserve what you get....
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/41483660@N04/6657578499/]libertarianism-anarchy-for-rich-people[/url]
Puregonzo1188
(1,948 posts)active in the labor movement and helped win some of the important victories for labor rights we have today (along with communists and socialists).
I suggest you do some research before posting nonsense.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Workers_of_the_World
MADem
(135,425 posts)It doesn't matter how your little friends claim that they feel, they're reaching the same anti-government conclusions and having the same effect on the population as the rich libertarians who also do not like government.
That's what the cartoon is saying.
A person can hate lemons because they don't like the taste, and another person can hate lemons because they are allergic to them, but the bottom line is the guy selling lemons ain't selling 'em to those two.
Puregonzo1188
(1,948 posts)Your comparing anarchism to libertarianism is like right wingers calling Obama a socialist or a communist. It's the same concept--people throwing around a word they don't know the meaning of as a pejorative.
How can it be that libertarians hate labor unions and anarchists have been highly active in the labor movement if they're the same? How can libertarians be for free markets and anarchist some of the most militant anti-capitalist if they're the same?
Do you think the Wooblies were the early version of the Tea Party? Do you think Emma Goldman would support Ron Paul if she was alive today? How about Sartre?
MindMover
(5,016 posts)"the term "libertarianism" has often been used as a synonym for anarchism"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism
MADem
(135,425 posts)the same end. That is what the cartoon is saying--quite clearly, too. You're just not taking the point.
spanone
(135,823 posts)he'll end up voting for mitt, i bet.
MagickMuffin
(15,936 posts)Now that would be something worth writing about.
Johonny
(20,833 posts)Why does Joe think a career house member is somehow an outsider and not part of the broken system? Or should the question be does Joe think?
MADem
(135,425 posts)He was one of those obstructionist fuckers who wouldn't let Clinton do a goddamned thing, who hemmed the guy in, who pushed WJC into the DADT compromise and twisted his arm to get DOMA on the books in exchange for passage of other legislation.
The only way he could be regarded as an "outsider" is that most congressional representatives don't wind up with dead women in their offices...in that way, he's certainly one of the special, different, and very RARE ones!
JHB
(37,158 posts)If you don't like the menu, maybe you have lousy ingredients.
MADem
(135,425 posts)sexism?
Jeez--he's stupider than I thought he was. Why didn't he write in his old buddy McCain (he was seen drooling in the front row at the McCain-Bush huggy rally) if he didn't like the field, instead of voting for a white supremacist who hates women?
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)FSogol
(45,476 posts)What an f'ing embarrassment. Shame on any thinking person that watches this drivel.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)If you watch it you are not thinking.
QED.
Mira
(22,380 posts)better myself.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)And there's not a fucking thing that douchecanoe could do about it.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)FSogol
(45,476 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)Fuck Ron Paul.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)FUCK Ron Paul.
tanyev
(42,550 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)all this garbage they've been saying, especially about Obamacare, and now all the RW pundits are backing the guy that invented it.
But at some point it also becomes bullshit itself, there's a lot of reason to believe Ron Paul was there to help Mitt. He made some attacks against Gingrich and Santorum which applied equally to Mitt, but he laid off Mitt.