Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,726 posts)
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 02:35 PM Jul 2016

AG Lynch answers no questions on emails refers Congress to FBI's Comey

This seems a bit odd to me and I don't think it helps any.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/attorney-general-scheduled-to-testify-before-house-judiciary-committee-on-clinton-email-investigation/2016/07/11/2dfb746c-479e-11e6-90a8-fb84201e0645_story.html


U.S. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch repeatedly declined to answer any questions on Tuesday about her department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server while she was secretary of state, making for a bizarre congressional hearing in which she referred questions about the matter to a man lower than her on the organizational chart.

At the outset of her testimony Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee, Lynch said it would be “inappropriate for me to comment further on the underlying facts of the investigation or the legal basis for the team’s recommendation.” That put her in contrast with FBI Director James B. Comey, who answered questions for nearly five hours last week about how he concluded Clinton should not face criminal charges.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

chillfactor

(7,573 posts)
1. I think Lynch gave the appropriate response.....
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jul 2016

I think it helps put the email witch hunt to bed...and I think she frustrated rethugs on the committee.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
2. I also think Lynch gave the appropriate response.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jul 2016

The investigation was conducted by the FBI, not by her or her direct team. Her role, as I understand it, is to accept or reject their recommendation, which she did. She would have no more information than what was given to her by the FBI, and which presumably was probed during Comey's testimony.

The optics might not be perfect, but I believe she's done the appropriate thing from a structural/process standpoint.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
4. Good move. They are on a witch hunt and this helps to expose it....
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jul 2016

to the true morons who still don't see it for what it is.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
7. Why don't you think it helps?
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jul 2016

The entire situation has been thoroughly investigated the little weasels can reference that.

underpants

(182,726 posts)
10. This becomes fodder for more coverage and plays right into the RIGGED talking point.
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jul 2016

It's not the not answering questions part, it's referring Congress to the FBI Director.

spanone

(135,805 posts)
8. the republicans have turned the house judiciary committee into a political whipping post
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 03:03 PM
Jul 2016

fuck them

this is ALL POLITICS

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
12. I wish she'd said something politely to that effect
Tue Jul 12, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jul 2016

I saw it and it will not translate well to the idiots who will be consuming garbage from the right wing propaganda mill

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AG Lynch answers no quest...