Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:40 PM Jun 2016

The Clinton Dynasty's Horrific Legacy: More Drug War, More Prisons

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by BooScout (a host of the General Discussion forum).

"
...
The explosion of the prison system under Bill Clinton’s version of the “War on Drugs” is impossible to dispute. The total prison population rose by 673,000 people under Clinton’s tenure — or by 235,000 more than it did under President Ronald Reagan, according to a study by the Justice Policy Institute. “Under President Bill Clinton, the number of prisoners under federal jurisdiction doubled, and grew more than it did under the previous 12-years of Republican rule,combined,” states the JPI report (italics theirs). The federal incarceration rate in 1999, the last year of the Democrat’s term, was 42 per 100,000 — more than double the federal incarceration rate at the end of President Reagan’s term (17 per 100,000), and 61 percent higher than at the end of President George Bush’s term (25 per 100,000), according to JPI.
...


http://www.alternet.org/drugs/clinton-dynasty-horrific-legacy-more-drug-war-more-prisons

Inconvenient truths.
The Clinton Dynasty's Horrific Legacy: More Drug War, More Prisons (Original Post) jtuck004 Jun 2016 OP
K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2016 #1
This post belongs in GD Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #3
Because it is cheaper than making sure the family has a good job, education, decent and jtuck004 Jun 2016 #5
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #12
Exactly...nt joeybee12 Jun 2016 #13
And you support an old white woman.... Delver Rootnose Jun 2016 #18
Thank you randy. Ya saved me some time. jtuck004 Jun 2016 #21
Jury results coming warrprayer Jun 2016 #31
Drum roll.... warrprayer Jun 2016 #34
More garabge from alternet...not sure if right-wing fascism joeybee12 Jun 2016 #4
Ask his victims. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2016 #6
Ask the people who supported the crime bill... joeybee12 Jun 2016 #10
Senator Bench Warmer has lost... Ned_Devine Jun 2016 #78
Yeah, garbage. Pfffft. These are real people. Real people. libdem4life Jun 2016 #7
Thanks for the well-thought out response joeybee12 Jun 2016 #8
Right who cares about the people...and yeah, I didn't have to think libdem4life Jun 2016 #15
.that^ 840high Jun 2016 #46
+1000 Unbelievable. The gall. nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #108
You DO know the definition of "fascism", don't you? Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #9
Thank you, I do... joeybee12 Jun 2016 #11
I'm not concerned at all... Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #14
You have no idea what fascism is. Left, right, center up or down. libdem4life Jun 2016 #16
Some Of Us Have Friends That Went To Prison billhicks76 Jun 2016 #23
My son was a victim of the Clinton drug war! Fuck their shit! Dont call me Shirley Jun 2016 #29
+1 Yes, fuck their shit.. phazed0 Jun 2016 #109
Really. Why don't people zentrum Jun 2016 #57
Left wing fascism? Please explain that one to me. n/t A Simple Game Jun 2016 #62
A well established term... at least from the 1960's.. phazed0 Jun 2016 #111
It's difficult to tell the difference any more liberal N proud Jun 2016 #77
Let's sow more discord and discontent Cary Jun 2016 #17
So the onus is not on the Clintons for doing horrific shit, it's on those who mention it? Fumesucker Jun 2016 #47
Attention... Cary Jun 2016 #92
Actually Hitchens was by far the biggest influence on my thinking about the Clintons Fumesucker Jun 2016 #93
Many government officials were involved in the increase of the incarceration rate during that time.. George II Jun 2016 #19
Everyone Was Doing It billhicks76 Jun 2016 #24
Are you familiar with all the legislators that voted for the crime bill.... George II Jun 2016 #30
Can we move on already? Zambero Jun 2016 #20
No False Equivalency billhicks76 Jun 2016 #25
The false equivalency IS: Zambero Jun 2016 #28
Everyone knows the implication of the OP, another attempt at hitting "Clinton" : George II Jun 2016 #32
Sorry but Hillary never would have had her position as Senator, or Sercretary of State if it were avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #63
That's what Trump has been spouting Zambero Jun 2016 #106
She didn't have to sign the bill, or be a senator, passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #79
A few unfortunate words in there. Jesus Malverde Jun 2016 #101
This used to be called McCarthyism Zambero Jun 2016 #107
Don't forget 2 for the price of 1, the copresidency aikoaiko Jun 2016 #110
it sure is NJCher Jun 2016 #35
.+1 840high Jun 2016 #48
So do I! SammyWinstonJack Jun 2016 #58
We can, but the people who were imprisoned, the lives broken, they still are. We just gonna jtuck004 Jun 2016 #45
the Hatred for Hillary Hysteria really overrides "The Chosen One" bullshit Skittles Jun 2016 #59
Exactly Gman Jun 2016 #99
The is the sort of post that will likely be disappearing from the DU come June 16th Tarc Jun 2016 #22
Might or might not work out like people think. "Granovetter (1973) argued that within a social netwo jtuck004 Jun 2016 #37
"...is that you need our votes..." Tarc Jun 2016 #64
Thought provoking. Thank you. chknltl Jun 2016 #104
The article doesn't even mention Plan Colombia. noamnety Jun 2016 #26
Perhaps because that had little effect on the incarceration rate in the US..... George II Jun 2016 #36
Yeah, that was kinda my point. noamnety Jun 2016 #52
There's a lot of revisionism about the Clinton era on DU the past few months... Blue_Tires Jun 2016 #27
yeah. this one was posted because poster is upset Clinton JI7 Jun 2016 #53
What??? arikara Jun 2016 #102
Interesting phrasing when "The" is used instead of "Bill" in the title. LonePirate Jun 2016 #33
Also interesting is that the administration of a President who was then re-elected.... George II Jun 2016 #39
Their wives returned to the WH as POTUS? Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #41
I don't know of any wives who returned to the White House as President. And only one child... George II Jun 2016 #42
So my point is Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #72
So you're agreeing with my premise that just because a President serves two terms... George II Jun 2016 #89
Bush is certainly a dynasty. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #100
With the exception of Teddy awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #113
They were sold as a team in the 90's Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #40
Correct. 840high Jun 2016 #50
No, they were not sold as team in the 90s. You are mistaken. LonePirate Jun 2016 #61
Two for the price of one Fumesucker Jun 2016 #67
A joint interview on 60 Minutes does make her a co-President. LonePirate Jun 2016 #74
"Hillary Clinton will say anything and change nothing" -Barack Obama Fumesucker Jun 2016 #81
And here I thought the hardcore Bernie crowd hated Obama because he represents the establishment. LonePirate Jun 2016 #83
I don't for a moment think Bernie will be the nominee Fumesucker Jun 2016 #86
I appreciate that you have accepted the reality of the situation. Thank you for that. LonePirate Jun 2016 #91
No, I'm not. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #71
Couple this with lifetime limits on "welfare" and Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #38
Yes. +1 840high Jun 2016 #51
No, CONGRESS built that "pipeline", and Sanders was one who voted for it. George II Jun 2016 #55
And who had the final say? Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #60
What? Hillary Clinton was a civilian not in government, Clinton was President (non-voting).... George II Jun 2016 #65
So the Clinton's did not sell themselves as a team in 96? Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #66
If the legislation wasn't passed Clinton wouldn't have had a chance to sign it..... George II Jun 2016 #68
Ok, so which is it? Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #69
Yes. George II Jun 2016 #90
Perfect. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #96
Such drama Gman Jun 2016 #43
the failed, life-destroying clusterfuck known as the drug war is "drama"? Warren DeMontague Jun 2016 #70
Yes drama Gman Jun 2016 #98
k/r thanks 840high Jun 2016 #44
The Clinton "dynasty." You must be assuming Hillary will win. pnwmom Jun 2016 #49
"Don't Punish Clinton, Sanders for 1994 Crime Bill" Lady_Chat Jun 2016 #54
What Clinton Dynasty? Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #56
So You Would Rather Have Had A Second Bush the Smarter Term Wolf Frankula Jun 2016 #73
More Right wing attacks of Clintons,,, Cryptoad Jun 2016 #75
Alternet is not Right Wing. nt JEB Jun 2016 #97
Sanders legacy to send nuclear waste to Hispanic town beachbumbob Jun 2016 #76
What happened to that nuclear waste? Is it safely stored? Where? immoderate Jun 2016 #82
After the house passed the bill...Sen Paul wellstone led the charge to beachbumbob Jun 2016 #84
Not what I asked. Where's the nuke? immoderate Jun 2016 #85
What part don't you understand...sanders cosponsored a bill to allow beachbumbob Jun 2016 #88
So this nuclear waste is now floating around somewhere, but not is Texas. Where did it go? immoderate Jun 2016 #95
Actually the crime bill arrivedcon Clinton's desk with a veto proof numbers. We know Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #80
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2016 #87
The major achievements of Bill's administration: Beowulf Jun 2016 #94
Well you got a few more days to push that line here. upaloopa Jun 2016 #103
I like cupcakes! johnp3907 Jun 2016 #105
And Bernie voted for those crime bills BainsBane Jun 2016 #112

RKP5637

(66,750 posts)
1. K&R!!! n/t
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
2. This post belongs in GD
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jun 2016

It's a constructive criticism of a Democratic President.

Response to jtuck004 (Original post)

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
5. Because it is cheaper than making sure the family has a good job, education, decent and
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jun 2016

safe housing, like the majority of white folk had?

And no history of slavery in a racist country.

Your Zimmerman-like analysis of the situation aside.

Response to jtuck004 (Reply #5)

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
13. Exactly...nt
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

Delver Rootnose

(250 posts)
18. And you support an old white woman....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:16 PM
Jun 2016

...who has had armed bodyguards most of her adult life to keep her safely away from the problems her policy cause. Plus the money not to care.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
21. Thank you randy. Ya saved me some time.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:29 PM
Jun 2016

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
31. Jury results coming
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jun 2016

Stay tuned.

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
34. Drum roll....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:03 PM
Jun 2016

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:01 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Doesn't appear offensive to me. I didn't even realize he was referring to Bernie.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: under 4 hrs on DU , 19 posts and alerted on for insulting another DU-er?
MIRT ? Hide irisblue
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
4. More garabge from alternet...not sure if right-wing fascism
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jun 2016

or left-wing fascism is worse.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
6. Ask his victims. n/t
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
10. Ask the people who supported the crime bill...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jun 2016

A large portion of African Americans at the time...oh, another inconvenient truth you don't want to hear because it doesn't fit this garbage narrative. Get over it, Senator Bench Warmer has lost...

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
78. Senator Bench Warmer has lost...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:42 PM
Jun 2016

Wow. What a sweet thing to say! Almost as sweet as this


 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
7. Yeah, garbage. Pfffft. These are real people. Real people.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

Comment on that...if possible. Fascism, left or right. Stunning.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
8. Thanks for the well-thought out response
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jun 2016

Scary that you think you're making sense.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
15. Right who cares about the people...and yeah, I didn't have to think
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jun 2016

more than about a minute to respond to that post. That and the multitudes of articles on the minority excess, the prison guards 6 figure incomes (I know that for a fact), the churning of young people, the ruining of families.

But hey, the Republicans ate it up and the Clintons pocketed quite a haul. The Prison Guards for Hillary campaign paid very well to keep these brand, spanking new jails open and full with a rotating door.

Sickening.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
46. .that^
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
108. +1000 Unbelievable. The gall. nt
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jun 2016
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
9. You DO know the definition of "fascism", don't you?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:57 PM
Jun 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe, influenced by national syndicalism. Fascism originated in Italy during World War I and spread to other European countries. Fascism opposes liberalism, Marxism and anarchism and is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.


The OP is *constructive criticism* of a Democratic President.

BTW, don't throw the "fascist" label around so much. It's smacking against Godwin's Law
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
11. Thank you, I do...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 04:58 PM
Jun 2016

But your concern is noted.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
14. I'm not concerned at all...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:03 PM
Jun 2016

Just trying to help a fellow DUer. It's my nature.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
16. You have no idea what fascism is. Left, right, center up or down.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:08 PM
Jun 2016

Also, fascism is a form of government. This is a form of churning money...capitalism...white power...need I go on. I did the google search for you as I'm sure you wouldn't.

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/Submit
noun
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
23. Some Of Us Have Friends That Went To Prison
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:41 PM
Jun 2016

And your asinine comments are out of place and insulting. You can't blame everything on your myopic political views. Clinton was in lock step with Bush Sr. They were friends. And the my both ruined countless lives.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
29. My son was a victim of the Clinton drug war! Fuck their shit!
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
109. +1 Yes, fuck their shit..
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:52 PM
Jun 2016

If a person blindly denies science, no fucking vote.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
57. Really. Why don't people
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jun 2016

…..realize that statistics about the vast increase in our prison population, are, like so many facts, fascistic.

Wish they would also realize that the increase in poverty and homelessness of families, after the Welfare Reform Act, is also a fascistic finding.

http://billmoyers.com/2014/05/12/how-bill-clintons-welfare-reform-created-a-system-rife-with-racial-biases/

http://www.thenation.com/article/clinton-touts-welfare-reform-heres-how-it-failed/

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
62. Left wing fascism? Please explain that one to me. n/t
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jun 2016
 

phazed0

(745 posts)
111. A well established term... at least from the 1960's..
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:57 PM
Jun 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_fascism

Left-wing fascism and left fascism are terms that have been used to describe tendencies in left-wing politics that contradict or violate the progressive ideals with which the Left is usually associated, such as free speech. Syntagmas such as left-wing fascism provide shorthand labels, but they lack any scientific precision, not the least due to the broad meaning of each of the components. Considering the general classification of fascism as being on the far right, crossovers may be expected according to the extremes meet theory (French: Les extrêmes se touchent). The touching point between the far left and the far right may be the use of power and/or political terrorism.


Sounds familiar.

liberal N proud

(60,106 posts)
77. It's difficult to tell the difference any more
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:42 PM
Jun 2016

Either way it is intended as an attack on a leading Democratic candidate.

Cary

(11,743 posts)
17. Let's sow more discord and discontent
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:14 PM
Jun 2016

Let's be demoralized and not show up to vote. Yes that's the ticket.



I felt the need to put the sarcasm smiley in because I have no confidence in some people to understand the obvious.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
47. So the onus is not on the Clintons for doing horrific shit, it's on those who mention it?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jun 2016

Anyone who isn't demoralized by them isn't paying attention.

Cary

(11,743 posts)
92. Attention...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jun 2016

To 30 years of "conservative" lies and smears. Sorry but I don't pay attention to the likes of Atwater, Coulter, or Rove.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
93. Actually Hitchens was by far the biggest influence on my thinking about the Clintons
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:37 PM
Jun 2016

Whatever Hitchens might have been he wasn't a knee jerk American conservative.

http://www.amazon.com/One-Left-Lie-Triangulations-Jefferson/dp/1455522996?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0

George II

(67,782 posts)
19. Many government officials were involved in the increase of the incarceration rate during that time..
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jun 2016

...not just President Clinton.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
24. Everyone Was Doing It
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:43 PM
Jun 2016

Great excuse. I say punish them all then.

George II

(67,782 posts)
30. Are you familiar with all the legislators that voted for the crime bill....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:59 PM
Jun 2016

....that increased the incarceration rate?

Zambero

(8,734 posts)
20. Can we move on already?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:22 PM
Jun 2016

However well-intended, those measures were all ill-advised. Even most who supported them 20 years ago will agree to that. But crunching select figures to conclude that Clinton's time in office was far worse than the other examples cited is a quite a reach. If another Clinton was not running for office at the moment, this level of false equivalency would not manifest itself. But she is. And it does.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
25. No False Equivalency
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:47 PM
Jun 2016

Not when it comes to the drug war. People have to accept that Clinton played the part of Bush's surrogate. It's a sad reality but a true one.

Zambero

(8,734 posts)
28. The false equivalency IS:
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:57 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary is NOT Bill or a Bill clone for that matter. They are two different people. She did not sign these pieces of legislation into law, and she was not yet a member of the U.S. Senate who could have voted on them. Guilt by association is generally pulled off the shelf after everything else fails.

George II

(67,782 posts)
32. Everyone knows the implication of the OP, another attempt at hitting "Clinton" :
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:02 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary via Bill. The curious thing is that only one of the two Democratic candidates this year actually voted for the legislation that boosted the incarceration rate.

You won't see many here talking about that, however.

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
63. Sorry but Hillary never would have had her position as Senator, or Sercretary of State if it were
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:58 PM
Jun 2016

not for Bill Clinton being her husband. She really is not that special otherwise.

Zambero

(8,734 posts)
106. That's what Trump has been spouting
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jun 2016

The "woman thing" is all she has to offer. It appears that Trump's ignorant toxic diatribes are influencing many here who should know better. Bill's preceding her in office are one thing. The fact that she is well-qualified for the job she is seeking, in her own right, is the far more important consideration.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
79. She didn't have to sign the bill, or be a senator,
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:51 PM
Jun 2016

to have a strong impact on the issue. She was FLOTUS and was the most politically active FLOTUS we've ever had. She helped Bill with everything he did. She helped sell it. So, along with Bill, she owns it.

She does not get off scot-free.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
101. A few unfortunate words in there.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:29 PM
Jun 2016

"Bring them to heel" like dogs.



This was all part of an era where baby boomers instituted across the board cultural crackdowns. Tipper Gore was running around at this time complaining about music lyrics.


Zambero

(8,734 posts)
107. This used to be called McCarthyism
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:40 PM
Jun 2016

"You know someone. Someone who is evil and wicked. You are inseparable by association. Therefore you are every bit as guilty as that person. Onto the enemies list you go. Begin the investigation. Your career is over. Ruined."

Nixon & company had a go at this as well.

aikoaiko

(33,931 posts)
110. Don't forget 2 for the price of 1, the copresidency
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:55 PM
Jun 2016

That was an intentional decision to say that she was deeply involved with the decisions of the presidency.

NJCher

(34,452 posts)
35. it sure is
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jun 2016

We might think we have a Democratic president, but we really have is just another right wing #2@#hole who knows how to fake out as a Dem. We're wise to it now, but not back then. I thought Clinton was just the greatest back then. Now I see him for what he is--duh, mostly because I see what his policies have brought abount.

No matter how hard we try, the right wing just seeps in there. Now they've taken over our party.

And this is why Bernie Sanders is our only hope.

I hope Bernie kicks her ass 40 ways from Sunday in California's primary.


Cher

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
48. .+1
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jun 2016

SammyWinstonJack

(44,118 posts)
58. So do I!
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:34 PM
Jun 2016
I hope Bernie kicks her ass 40 ways from Sunday in California's primary.
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
45. We can, but the people who were imprisoned, the lives broken, they still are. We just gonna
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jun 2016

ignore them, Move On?

Skittles

(152,105 posts)
59. the Hatred for Hillary Hysteria really overrides "The Chosen One" bullshit
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jun 2016

Gman

(24,780 posts)
99. Exactly
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:04 PM
Jun 2016

Tarc

(10,461 posts)
22. The is the sort of post that will likely be disappearing from the DU come June 16th
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jun 2016

Per Skinner's recent comments.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
37. Might or might not work out like people think. "Granovetter (1973) argued that within a social netwo
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:09 PM
Jun 2016

"Granovetter (1973) argued that within a social network, weak ties are more powerful than strong ties. He explained that this was because information was far more likely to be “diffused” through weaker ties. He concluded that weak ties are “indispensable to individuals’ opportunities and to their incorporation into communities while strong ties breed local cohesion.”"

http://boxesandarrows.com/social-networks-and-group-formation/

This is a social network. The knee-jerk thinking seems to be that someone or some group can pick on things that hurt their feelings and cast them out, and life will be bubbles and champagne.

Perhaps. On the other hand, weak ties might be more important than you know. If the election doesn't go as planned, or if other races turn sour, people might well look at some of this (both here and other places) and make the case that such behavior depressed turnout, rather than facilitating it. That wouldn't reflect well on any site, or organization. Well, except for the real estate swindler, but he has such a low bar no one expects anything from him.

I put the article up because I don't much like two-faced hypocrites that piss on Democratic principles to make themselves millions. Or people that cover up for them. I left out out his part in the conspiracy that foreclosed on 8 million American families and has left more people in poverty and hunger, as well as increasing the numbers of working poor by tens of millions. Those links are available.

I vote for my country, not a party, since I think the latter is great way to lose a nation. Feel free to ban whatever, this isn't the only outlet. I most certainly affect more local votes in the donut shops and libraries than here, so no great loss to me.

The upshot of that article, btw, is that you need our votes and the ones we influence far more that we need your web site. That may be just about to become much more clear, one way or the other. But I bet you won't like it.

Tarc

(10,461 posts)
64. "...is that you need our votes..."
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:58 PM
Jun 2016

No,m actually, we don't. The majority of Sanders voters see the big picture and will vote Democratic regardless; doubly so when the opponent is a violent xenophobe like Trump.

We don't need the Bernie or Busters, a group that is a statistical irrelevance.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
104. Thought provoking. Thank you.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jun 2016

I see things from a simplistic, descending order of importance viewpoint:

PLANET FIRST, We The People second; party third.

This is how I discuss politics with anyone, regardless of nationality or party. I love talking politics with anyone, (except trolls), anywhere, any time.

It's not that profound for me, when a party gets in the way of equality for our fellow citizens, when it gets in the way of the safety of the citizenry of this planet, that party and I don't see eye to eye.

PLANET FIRST, We The People second, party third.
I dunno, that seems like a good system for me. If it costs me my membership at DU then the question I needed to ask all along is: did I REALLY want to be here?






 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
26. The article doesn't even mention Plan Colombia.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jun 2016

Do the Clintons even talk about that? Or is it like it never happened?

George II

(67,782 posts)
36. Perhaps because that had little effect on the incarceration rate in the US.....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jun 2016

.....which is the subject of the OP?

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
52. Yeah, that was kinda my point.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jun 2016

We only talk about how the war on drugs affected/affects US citizens.

We don't talk about the devastation the Clinton presidency caused by spraying Monsanto roundup from the air on people, on food crops, etc.

That thing Hillary said about if Flint had happened in Grosse Pointe ... it's like that. If Colombia had primarily white European people, we might be at least having conversations about what Clinton did there.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
27. There's a lot of revisionism about the Clinton era on DU the past few months...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 05:52 PM
Jun 2016

Which is another inconvenient truth, but I'll just leave it at that...

JI7

(88,708 posts)
53. yeah. this one was posted because poster is upset Clinton
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jun 2016

will give eulogy for Muhammed Ali .

arikara

(5,562 posts)
102. What???
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jun 2016

NO! that's an abomination.
Ali was against war.

LonePirate

(13,286 posts)
33. Interesting phrasing when "The" is used instead of "Bill" in the title.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:03 PM
Jun 2016

No smear job in that article, obviously!



George II

(67,782 posts)
39. Also interesting is that the administration of a President who was then re-elected....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jun 2016

....is called a "dynasty"! Many of those on DU who embrace that characterization also consider themselves "FDR Democrats".

Oh the irony!

That would also make the administrations of these Presidents "dynasties":

George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
James Monroe
Andrew Jackson
Abraham Lincoln
Ulysses S. Grant
Theodore Roosevelt
Woodrow Wilson
(FDR)
Harry Truman
Dwight Eisenhower
Richard Nixon
Ronald Reagan
Bush the Second

and, of course Barack Obama.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
41. Their wives returned to the WH as POTUS?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:14 PM
Jun 2016

Their children?

George II

(67,782 posts)
42. I don't know of any wives who returned to the White House as President. And only one child...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:16 PM
Jun 2016

...has.

So, your point?

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
72. So my point is
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:26 PM
Jun 2016

your list is not a list of dynasty families.

George II

(67,782 posts)
89. So you're agreeing with my premise that just because a President serves two terms...
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jun 2016

...it doesn't qualify as a "dynasty", other than perhaps a Bush dynasty. But you didn't post the OP. It talks about some so-called "Clinton Dynasty", even though it doesn't meet your qualification.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
100. Bush is certainly a dynasty.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:15 PM
Jun 2016

If Hillary becomes potus she will be the second dynasty, more so she would create the one true dynasty by being not a child, but a spouse.

I'm 39. Bush's and Clinton's have held the WH for more than half of my lifetime. Sounds like a dynasty to me. I'm not looking forward to even 1 more year of either family having one damn thing to do with my life.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
113. With the exception of Teddy
Sun Jun 5, 2016, 12:29 AM
Jun 2016

which of those presidents had a close family member who ran for president?

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
40. They were sold as a team in the 90's
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jun 2016

advertised as a team in 08 and Hillary said Bill will handle the economy/jobs if she's elected.

So yes, THE is used instead of Bill.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
50. Correct.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jun 2016

LonePirate

(13,286 posts)
61. No, they were not sold as team in the 90s. You are mistaken.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jun 2016

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
67. Two for the price of one
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jun 2016

There are far too many references to that for it to be credibly denied.

LonePirate

(13,286 posts)
74. A joint interview on 60 Minutes does make her a co-President.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:36 PM
Jun 2016

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
81. "Hillary Clinton will say anything and change nothing" -Barack Obama
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jun 2016

Their words mean nothing from one moment to the next, I've been listening to them for a substantial portion of my adult life and Obama's characterization I quoted above seems accurate to me.

LonePirate

(13,286 posts)
83. And here I thought the hardcore Bernie crowd hated Obama because he represents the establishment.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jun 2016

I wish they would stop flip flopping on whether or not they respect our President. Between the changing opinions on Obama and the superdelegates, you never know what to believe with them.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
86. I don't for a moment think Bernie will be the nominee
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:09 PM
Jun 2016

I'm in the ABB camp, the nominee will be Anyone But Bernie. He really has put the fear of god into the establishment as much as they can ever actually feel such a human emotion.

LonePirate

(13,286 posts)
91. I appreciate that you have accepted the reality of the situation. Thank you for that.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jun 2016

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
71. No, I'm not.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:22 PM
Jun 2016

They we're sold as a team. Hillary was not going to sit at home and bake cookies, she was going to be involved.

FFS, all you need to do is look toward the attempted health reform failure for proof of involvement.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
38. Couple this with lifetime limits on "welfare" and
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:12 PM
Jun 2016

the Clinton's built a legendary pupil to prison inmate pipeline.

We can afford another Clinton POTUS like we can another Cheney advised Bush.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
51. Yes. +1
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:28 PM
Jun 2016

George II

(67,782 posts)
55. No, CONGRESS built that "pipeline", and Sanders was one who voted for it.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jun 2016

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
60. And who had the final say?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:46 PM
Jun 2016

The family that campaigned on it.

George II

(67,782 posts)
65. What? Hillary Clinton was a civilian not in government, Clinton was President (non-voting)....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jun 2016

....but Sanders was a Congressman and voted for it.

So, if the Clintons were campaigning for it, how could you support Sanders if could be "fooled" so easily and voted for it?

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
66. So the Clinton's did not sell themselves as a team in 96?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jun 2016

Clinton (Bill) did not have the final signature on the legislation?

George II

(67,782 posts)
68. If the legislation wasn't passed Clinton wouldn't have had a chance to sign it.....
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:05 PM
Jun 2016

....and most married couples consider themselves a "team".

I know I do, and I didn't even expect my wife to change her last name (she didn't).

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
69. Ok, so which is it?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:09 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary has no responsibility for the 90's or she was an integral part?

George II

(67,782 posts)
90. Yes.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:14 PM
Jun 2016

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
96. Perfect.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:55 PM
Jun 2016

Perfect in every way. Teflon.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
43. Such drama
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jun 2016

Gman

(24,780 posts)
98. Yes drama
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:59 PM
Jun 2016

What a nice luxury to have to be able to judge from 25 years in the future. Monday morning quarterbacking to an extreme.

Conveniently there's no mention of the CIA's role in getting Blacks hooked on crack to finance illegal activities nor mention of having the whole problem dumped in his lap and the politics surrounding the right wing propaganda. In other words, Bill didn't control the message much less the agenda. Without considering all of the context this is nothing more than grandstanding drama.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
44. k/r thanks
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jun 2016

pnwmom

(108,603 posts)
49. The Clinton "dynasty." You must be assuming Hillary will win.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jun 2016

Thanks for that note of realism, anyway.

Lady_Chat

(561 posts)
54. "Don't Punish Clinton, Sanders for 1994 Crime Bill"
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:31 PM
Jun 2016

A very interesting read.

"Don't Punish Clinton, Sanders for 1994 Crime Bill"


"Why did Bill Clinton want a crime bill in the first place? Two reasons. The first was substantive: There was a lot of crime back then. More than double the current rate. There was a legitimate public demand for action."


"Second, Democrats had long been pegged as soft on crime, hampering their electoral prospects. A shadow hanging over the Democrats in the 1992 campaign was the infamous Willie Horton scandal. The losing 1988 Democratic presidential candidate, Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis, was pilloried for a furlough program that allowed the convicted murderer, who was serving a life sentence, to viciously rape a woman and torture her fiancé."


"The bill was not strictly about incarceration. Also included in the $30 billion were funds aimed at crime prevention: community policing, drug treatment and so-called “midnight basketball” leagues to help keep teens out of trouble. The landmark Violence Against Women Act was established in that bill, which has helped reduce domestic violence by two-thirds, a steeper drop than the overall decline in violent crime. And the bill included an assault weapons ban, although congressional Republicans refused to renew it a decade later."Clinton’s efforts to soften the Senate version and include prevention programs won support for the bill from several members of the Congressional Black Caucus. The caucus chairman said at the end of the process, “We have put our stamp on this bill.”

"But the president also had to appease Republicans to compensate for lost Democratic votes. He maintained the crack and powder cocaine disparity (Clinton pushed for reducing the disparity in his second term but got nowhere with the Republican Congress). And he tied funds for state prison construction to the removal of state judicial discretion on sentencing."

"Clinton’s efforts to soften the Senate version and include prevention programs won support for the bill from several members of the Congressional Black Caucus. The caucus chairman said at the end of the process, “We have put our stamp on this bill.”


Clinton also tried to contain the Senate’s more conservative impulses, successfully narrowing the scope of its “three strikes” mandatory life sentence provision in the final version. “We shouldn't litter it up with every offense in the world,” Clinton admonished, saying it should focus on the “relatively small number of people that are wreaking heartbreak and devastation and death.”

more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/02/22/dont_punish_clinton_sanders_for_1994_crime_bill_129729.html

Mike Nelson

(9,664 posts)
56. What Clinton Dynasty?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jun 2016

... one Clinton and a prospective Rodham do not constitute a "Dynasty" in any way.

Wolf Frankula

(3,558 posts)
73. So You Would Rather Have Had A Second Bush the Smarter Term
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:31 PM
Jun 2016

Or Thud Dull in '96.

And Now You're Thumping for Trump T. Trump because "HE'S SUCH A GENIUS!"

Back under your bridge, troll

Wolf

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
75. More Right wing attacks of Clintons,,,
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:40 PM
Jun 2016

three more days for yall to get em all in,,,,,, hurry sundown!

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
97. Alternet is not Right Wing. nt
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:56 PM
Jun 2016
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
76. Sanders legacy to send nuclear waste to Hispanic town
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:40 PM
Jun 2016

In Texas and his wife working for that concern....sanders easily bought and gives not a damn for the wellbeing of the environment or people....1994 bill HE co-sponsored

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
82. What happened to that nuclear waste? Is it safely stored? Where?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:54 PM
Jun 2016


--imm
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
84. After the house passed the bill...Sen Paul wellstone led the charge to
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:01 PM
Jun 2016

Defeat it in the senate and was successful. Congressman sanders sold out to the northeast nuclear power industry in his sponsoring of the legislation....and Jane sanders currently works for the same organization....95% of sanders supporters have zero know legend of Bernie sanders.....he is a sellout and hides it well....google it...all true....

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
85. Not what I asked. Where's the nuke?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:07 PM
Jun 2016

--imm

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
88. What part don't you understand...sanders cosponsored a bill to allow
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:13 PM
Jun 2016

Nuclear waste to be shipped to a repository located outside a Hispanic town in Texas and if it want for Sen Paul Wellstone...sanders would have been responsible for putting nuclear waste in Texas at the behest...do I need to explain what behest means? Of the nuclear power consortium in the northeast...the same consortium who hired his wife Jane after dismissal from Burlington college....google the facts....don't fear the truth....educate your self....

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
95. So this nuclear waste is now floating around somewhere, but not is Texas. Where did it go?
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:44 PM
Jun 2016

Did they dump it in a river? It is nuclear. It's dangerous, right? what was it's ultimate disposition?

--imm

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
80. Actually the crime bill arrivedcon Clinton's desk with a veto proof numbers. We know
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jun 2016

Who voted to pass the bill. On the dynasty part there has been two sons to follow their fathers presidency. Has there been othrer couples who fould have both with the ability to be president it would have been Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. Here another dynasty with cousins elected and Eleanor was a cousin to both.

I would hope we would not limit presidency to people without relatives having the same position.

Uncle Joe

(56,977 posts)
87. Kicked and recommended.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:10 PM
Jun 2016

Thanks for the thread, jtuck004.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
94. The major achievements of Bill's administration:
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 09:42 PM
Jun 2016

The Crime Bill
NAFTA
The Welfare Bill
Bank Deregulation
Balanced Budget/Austerity

And we nearly had the privatization of Social Security. Bill and Newt had an agreement in place, but then the Monica business hit the press.

All Republican ideas and goals, triangulated by the Clintons.

Hillary was part of that, 2 for 1. Bill has been a constant on the campaign trail for Hillary and recently she said she wanted Bill to oversee revitalizing the economy. Seems like 2 for 1 is still the model.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
103. Well you got a few more days to push that line here.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jun 2016

johnp3907

(3,697 posts)
105. I like cupcakes!
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:27 PM
Jun 2016

BainsBane

(52,906 posts)
112. And Bernie voted for those crime bills
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 11:59 PM
Jun 2016

While Bill Clinton isn't running for office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Clinton Dynasty's Hor...