Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 10:37 AM Jun 2012

59 Schools Parents Boycott Field Tests for High-Stakes Exams, demanding more teaching less testing

Too many Democrats are on the same side as Republicans on this issue, and these parents have figured out one of the ugly reasons why: constant redundant testing puts money in the pockets of testing companies which they then use to buy politicians to require more testing.

These parents bypassed the politicians and went directly to the source of the problem: they protested at the testing company.

Like the Occupy Movement, to get action to stop education "reform" that is destroying our public schools so for-profit charter and management companies can take over, we need to go to the source, the companies buying the corrupt politicians.

Pearson might make a good test case. Since it's clear even many Democrats are ignoring good policy on this educators have a simple way they can effect change themselves: Whenever they have an individual choice of textbooks or materials or are involved in purchasing decisions for their schools, districts, or even states, they should refuse to consider Pearson, and send them a brief letter saying why. Pearson also does a substantial business in college textbooks, so higher ed instructors can cut them off too.

Over time, educators should figure out which textbook, software, and other companies are pushing for these policies, and boycott them until education decisions are back in the hands of educators and those who put kids ahead of profits.



Parents across New York City and New York State, fed up with high-stakes and excessive standardized testing in public education, are boycotting the “stand-alone” field tests scheduled for middle and elementary schools this week. And many are joining a protest at the headquarters of Pearson, the state’s for-profit test development contractor, to demonstrate their anger as well.

From June 5^th to June 12^th , children across the state are being forced to give up learning time solely to serve the research purposes of billion-dollar test publisher Pearson, which has a $32 million contract with the New York State Education Department. But parents in 59 schools – an unprecedented number – are fighting back by refusing to allow their children to take these field tests.

In support, the Chancellor’s Parent Advisory Council (CPAC) passed a resolution on May 31 endorsing the boycott and urging all parents to opt their children out of the field tests. The Community Education Councils (CECs) of District 3 in Manhattan (Upper West Side) and District 20 (Bay Ridge, Dyker Heights, Borough Park, Kensington) in Brooklyn passed similar resolutions.

“All this testing is out of control,” says Dani Gonzalez, a Bronx parent who is protesting at today’s demonstration. “Real learning happens when children can explore and experiment and do projects, when they can read books and discuss them. All this testing is crowding real learning out of the classroom. My children can’t learn when all they do is prepare for tests and take tests.”

FULL TEXT
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
59 Schools Parents Boycott Field Tests for High-Stakes Exams, demanding more teaching less testing (Original Post) yurbud Jun 2012 OP
k&r Starry Messenger Jun 2012 #1
I think these tests were introduced to create failing schools... Blue Meany Jun 2012 #2
exactly. sadly, same is happening in community colleges yurbud Jun 2012 #5
I've always hated Pearson as a teacher. knitter4democracy Jun 2012 #3
Almost every textbook I have exboyfil Jun 2012 #4
I like NTC, but their books don't come with all the bells and whistles. knitter4democracy Jun 2012 #15
One CA legislator has figured out how to do that: open source textbooks yurbud Jun 2012 #7
I think they are the future obamanut2012 Jun 2012 #12
That's one of my favorite cartoons proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #6
the only thing that would be better was if it looked like the caps were sucking their brains OUT yurbud Jun 2012 #11
Pearson are parasites (they have a lock on testing both students and teachers) Tom Ripley Jun 2012 #8
which test do they do on teachers? yurbud Jun 2012 #9
Various certification tests Tom Ripley Jun 2012 #10
Does Pearson author the Praxis? proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #13
Co-authored by Pearson and our old friends ETS Tom Ripley Jun 2012 #14
 

Blue Meany

(1,947 posts)
2. I think these tests were introduced to create failing schools...
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 11:03 AM
Jun 2012

That is, the purpose of testing is to create a situation in which many schools can be said to be failing. Then the private sector can move in with its "solution". But the privatized schools will not be held to the same standards and will not be required to fulfill the mandate of public schools, rather like UPS vs. the Post Office.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
5. exactly. sadly, same is happening in community colleges
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:04 PM
Jun 2012

just as Washington is noticing scams on financial aid with for profit colleges, partnerships with for profits are trying to be forced on CC's here in California, first through state level legislation (which failed) and now at the district level through corrupt trustees and administrators.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
3. I've always hated Pearson as a teacher.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 11:09 AM
Jun 2012

Their textbooks are crap. I've found all kinds of errors, badly edited selections, horrible questions, and pointless extra materials to be their norm for any lit textbooks. Their testing material is awful, too.

It's time to throw it all out and start over.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
4. Almost every textbook I have
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 11:34 AM
Jun 2012

seen has problems. Do you have recommendations? What I don't understand is why the Federal government Department of Education not sponsor open source textbooks. Look for the absolute lowest cost solution (which I think -ereaders aside because of other issues- would be printed modules disposable (or retained by student for reference) that combine text and workbook features. These would be great in math especially review an Algebra II/Trig textbook and Precalculus textbook or a PreAlgebra and Algebra I textbook. In both cases over 50% of the material is common to the two textbooks.

knitter4democracy

(14,350 posts)
15. I like NTC, but their books don't come with all the bells and whistles.
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 07:53 PM
Jun 2012

I don't use textbook supplemental materials, so I like the cheaper price and better selections.

Better still would be open source textbooks available in e-book form, too. That would be awesome.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
7. One CA legislator has figured out how to do that: open source textbooks
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:12 PM
Jun 2012

College students may find relief from high textbook prices in a California State Senate bill that would create a free open source textbook library.

State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, introduced a bill Feb. 8 that would fund a library containing open source textbooks for the 50 most popular lower division courses at the state’s colleges and universities. Students could download the textbooks for free or pay about $20 for a hard copy.

On March 3, the bill — which asks for $25 million in state funding to create the open source textbooks — will be eligible for discussion in committee hearings. But that funding request can change as the bill moves through the hearings, according to Steinberg spokesperson Alicia Trost.

Steinberg estimated in a Dec. 13 press release that the library could save nearly $1,000 annually per student. His plan would create a council composed of nine faculty members from the UC, CSU and community colleges to determine which textbooks to produce and develop a peer review process to ensure the quality of the materials in the library.



http://www.dailycal.org/2012/02/29/california-state-senate-bill-seeks-to-create-open-source-textbook-library/

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
11. the only thing that would be better was if it looked like the caps were sucking their brains OUT
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:35 PM
Jun 2012

instead of funneling shit in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»59 Schools Parents Boycot...