Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:10 AM
TomCADem (16,355 posts)
WaPo - "The Democrats’ Adult Campaign" - Discussion of *yawn* Tax Policy
In March, the Nonpartisan Tax Policy Center has finished publishing a series of analyses of the candidate's respective tax plans, which can be found here:
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/research-commentary?topic_filter=261 The analysis does not specifically try to measure the impact on GDP of the respective tax plans, as well as the related spending plans offered by the candidates. But, as this WaPo story discusses, at least Hillary and Bernie's plans are based on reality based assumptions compared to the plans offered by Republicans: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-democrats-adult-campaign/2016/03/05/b0854d42-e257-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html Take, for example, the fundamental question of how a government should tax and spend. Ms. Clinton in particular has offered a raft of serious, progressive proposals that are grounded in reality, even though the electorate has sometimes seemed more interested in ideological pizzazz. The independent Tax Policy Center, which has been examining each candidate’s fiscal plans, reported last week that Ms. Clinton’s would raise about $1.1 trillion in new revenue over a decade, almost entirely from very high earners. She would spend a significant portion of this money — on a tax cut for the middle class, making college debt-free and other programs. Though it is still unclear exactly how much of Ms. Clinton’s new revenue would be put to righting the country’s long-term budget outlook, hers is the most fiscally responsible plan on the table.
|
4 replies, 1287 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
TomCADem | Apr 2016 | OP |
SunSeeker | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
TomCADem | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
muriel_volestrangler | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
pampango | Apr 2016 | #4 |
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #1)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:09 PM
TomCADem (16,355 posts)
2. Important and Also Cures Insomnia!
You can almost see why the media chooses to cover Republicans acting childish.
|
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:39 PM
muriel_volestrangler (95,159 posts)
3. And the awful thing is that, thanks to the Republican's stranglehold on the House,
the realistic Democratic plans have no chance of getting enacted. If the Democrats do well in 2020 at state levels, then the Republican gerrymandering might be rolled back, and in 2022 a sane House might be elected, but it's almost impossible to get a Democratic budget passed before that.
If something went wrong and a Republican got in as president with a Senate majority in 2016, they could ruin the USA's government. Vote Democrat. Whoever the nominee is, and in the House and Senate too. The future of the USA depends on it. |
Response to TomCADem (Original post)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:03 PM
pampango (24,689 posts)
4. Good read for anyone who thinks Trump is 'to the left' of any Democrat on tax policy.
I've seen that opinion posted a few times.
|