Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:35 AM
JI7 (86,315 posts)
Is There Anyone that DIDN'T Know this was a Right Wing Troll ?
long time and pretty openly bigoted troll.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=307836&sub=trans
|
36 replies, 3962 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
JI7 | Feb 2016 | OP |
Agnosticsherbet | Feb 2016 | #1 | |
BlueCaliDem | Feb 2016 | #2 | |
still_one | Feb 2016 | #5 | |
Chichiri | Feb 2016 | #10 | |
Hortensis | Feb 2016 | #19 | |
Warpy | Feb 2016 | #3 | |
JI7 | Feb 2016 | #4 | |
Omaha Steve | Feb 2016 | #24 | |
Warpy | Feb 2016 | #33 | |
MosheFeingold | Feb 2016 | #15 | |
In_The_Wind | Feb 2016 | #6 | |
sufrommich | Feb 2016 | #7 | |
dmr | Feb 2016 | #11 | |
Coolest Ranger | Feb 2016 | #8 | |
octoberlib | Feb 2016 | #9 | |
pintobean | Feb 2016 | #12 | |
BlueCaliDem | Feb 2016 | #14 | |
Prism | Feb 2016 | #25 | |
BlueCaliDem | Feb 2016 | #28 | |
Prism | Feb 2016 | #29 | |
BlueCaliDem | Feb 2016 | #30 | |
Prism | Feb 2016 | #34 | |
cyberswede | Feb 2016 | #16 | |
pintobean | Feb 2016 | #18 | |
HuckleB | Feb 2016 | #36 | |
Bluenorthwest | Feb 2016 | #13 | |
UtahLib | Feb 2016 | #17 | |
lpbk2713 | Feb 2016 | #20 | |
Tommy_Carcetti | Feb 2016 | #21 | |
seaglass | Feb 2016 | #22 | |
stevenleser | Feb 2016 | #23 | |
el_bryanto | Feb 2016 | #35 | |
giftedgirl77 | Feb 2016 | #26 | |
2naSalit | Feb 2016 | #27 | |
Blue_Tires | Feb 2016 | #31 | |
LanternWaste | Feb 2016 | #32 |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:46 AM
Agnosticsherbet (11,619 posts)
1. Good news, indeed.
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:53 AM
BlueCaliDem (15,434 posts)
2. Yeah, but was protected by a certain segment on DU.
Boy! They must be feeling foolish right about now. Or not.
|
Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:20 AM
still_one (83,648 posts)
5. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:55 AM
Chichiri (4,667 posts)
10. Also +many. nt
Response to Chichiri (Reply #10)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:58 PM
Hortensis (51,713 posts)
19. The Hillary Hate posts blocked seemed standard stuff
for type of people he/she was flaming with and not even as bad as many others. I would never have noticed, but I have a really bad memory for names. In any case, good others are taking notes.
|
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:05 AM
Warpy (102,768 posts)
3. I knew he was a Clinton hater
and a completely irrational one as so many of them are.
I imagine the Bernie group smells better already. |
Response to Warpy (Reply #3)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:14 AM
JI7 (86,315 posts)
4. not just Clinton, he had a long history of hostility towards blacks, jews, feminists etc
never posted anything pro sanders but hid behind it in order to attack others.
|
Response to JI7 (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:30 PM
Omaha Steve (85,611 posts)
24. Well then he isn't a Bernie (former) DUer
OOPS! ![]() |
Response to JI7 (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:08 PM
Warpy (102,768 posts)
33. I'm delighted to say I never read that much of him
except for the venom he spit at Clinton. That being said, I'm glad he's gone. Sanders doesn't need that kind of "supporter."
|
Response to Warpy (Reply #3)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:19 PM
MosheFeingold (3,051 posts)
15. Being utterly disgusted by Clinton
Doesn't make one a right wing troll.
I don't care for her myself, so I fully understand some level of healthy loathing, until perhaps the general election, and even then I understand being not bothered to vote, even though I'll probably get a clothes pin and pull the lever. That said, the troll give-a-way is the ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME. |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:01 AM
In_The_Wind (72,287 posts)
6. Holy crap!!!
![]() |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:35 AM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
7. I asked in the ATA forum for his profile information
to be erased,it's a disgusting,vile rant that shouldn't exist on DU.
|
Response to sufrommich (Reply #7)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:55 AM
dmr (27,843 posts)
11. Good idea. It's beyond disgusting.
Good riddance to an ugly troll.
![]() |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:35 AM
Coolest Ranger (2,034 posts)
8. Thank you EarlG
one down no telling how many more to go
|
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:42 AM
octoberlib (14,763 posts)
9. That's disgusting. Thanks, EarlG
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:02 AM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
12. I wonder why this post was hidden.
Does anyone know, or have jury results?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027630616 |
Response to pintobean (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:38 AM
BlueCaliDem (15,434 posts)
14. Because he has a lot of sympathizers on DU.
And for no other reason.
|
Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:34 PM
Prism (5,815 posts)
25. But despite your anti-LGBT history
You're allowed to stay.
So let's not be too pleased. |
Response to Prism (Reply #25)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:04 PM
BlueCaliDem (15,434 posts)
28. You're like a dog with bone, aren't you, Prism? You write things in stone in your mind
and that becomes your world. The concept of evolution totally eludes you, doesn't it?
As an FYI? The VAST majority of Democrats were for civil unions, not same-sex marriage during that time that was, what, ten years ago? But unlike you, people do evolve and move on. Let's keep things in perspective: the consensus was back then, civil unions with equal marital rights was preferred by every Democrat including Barack Obama, BERNIE SANDERS, Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, DiFi, Barbara Boxer, the vast majority of Congressional Dems, and just about the entire Black, Latino, and Asian community. But they've evolved since, haven't they? And thanks to BARACK OBAMA, DOMA and DADT are gone, and under his watch, same-sex marriage is legal all across the country. So you're espousing ancient history. Time to let it go, otherwise it'll eat at you until there's nothing left inside you. Or am I too late with my advice? |
Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #28)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:42 PM
Prism (5,815 posts)
29. You cite politicians, which is apropos
And that is very much the point. It doesn't matter what the politicians say. There is right and there is wrong. You were wrong. Not only wrong, you were vocally wrong and attacked LGBTers in this space in your wrongness.
I don't need a politician to tell me what is an acceptable idea this week. I don't need a politician to figure out what is right in my own mind. You fall back on them. So why on earth should anyone bother about what you think now? You go with the wind, taking your cues, and who cares who gets hurt? A politician said it was ok! Yeah, that mindset. Just magical. |
Response to Prism (Reply #29)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:00 PM
BlueCaliDem (15,434 posts)
30. Let it go, Prism. Let it go.
I really don't care whether you believe I have any credibility to be a longtime member of Democratic Underground but I'm a Democrat, through and through. Not a fair-weather one, but a true Democrat, and that's why I'm still here and that other poster isn't. Period.
I sure do hope you don't have too much of the sadz. ![]() |
Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #30)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:10 PM
Prism (5,815 posts)
34. You are what you are
Were you ever sorry? Did you ever apologize? Or did you shrug and go where you were told and figured, well, now it's ok?
I don't have a sadz in the slightest. I'm actually pretty awesome (Vegas next weekend, woo!). But if you're going to lounge around and accuse other Democrats of being right-wingers or haters or what have you. Tch, please. You hated long before anyone here. And you justified it. So, just the worst. |
Response to pintobean (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:40 PM
cyberswede (26,117 posts)
16. Prolly becasue of the c-word
Even though it's a quote.
|
Response to cyberswede (Reply #16)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:58 PM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
18. That's so thin skinned, it's pathetic.
The word exists. How it is used is what matters. ND was quoting a banned asshole. There was no malicious intent. It's like Sharpton quoting some racist who used the N word. Would we want to censor and punish him for it?
Should EarlG have given a bad word warning when directing members to that profile page? ![]() |
Response to pintobean (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:17 PM
HuckleB (35,773 posts)
36. It looks like ...
it's possible that ND may be victim to a crowd that goes after him. It wouldn't be the first person facing that.
|
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:12 AM
Bluenorthwest (45,319 posts)
13. For years. For thousands of posts.
nt
|
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 12:50 PM
UtahLib (3,169 posts)
17. A disgustingly nasty troll. nt
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:20 PM
lpbk2713 (40,913 posts)
20. A visitor from The Twilight Zone.
Not just your run of the mill RW NutJob. |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:26 PM
Tommy_Carcetti (41,269 posts)
21. Well....that's an "About Me" that wants me to get to know him more. nt
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:28 PM
seaglass (8,131 posts)
22. May have read a couple posts by this poster and that was enough. So YAY another one down, many
more to go.
![]() |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:28 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
23. Yep. Lots more like them here too.
Hostile to most elected Democrats, hostile to African Americans and women.
That combination of characteristics should result in PPR. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #23)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:10 PM
el_bryanto (11,804 posts)
35. I'm not hostile to elected Democrats myself. I just wish they would remember they are democrats
when they vote. Many of our elected officials seem confused as to whether they should support liberal or conservative principles.
Bryant |
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:48 PM
giftedgirl77 (4,713 posts)
26. That one didn't even try to hide it.
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:55 PM
2naSalit (58,483 posts)
27. I suspected it some time ago
good riddance.
|
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:12 PM
Blue_Tires (55,443 posts)
31. not surprised...
Response to JI7 (Original post)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:16 PM
LanternWaste (37,748 posts)
32. I imagine those who recced his posts were blithely unaware...
I imagine those who recced his posts were blithely unaware... at least, I certainly hope they were blithely unaware.
|