Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,468 posts)
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 09:35 PM Jan 2016

What can be done about Flint water?

Once we are past the blames and the accusations..

Will reconnecting to Detroit water solve the problem? Or will the whole pipes infrastructure will have to be replaced? I really want to know, no snarks or sarcasm...

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Siwsan

(26,259 posts)
1. The whole pipe structure needs to be replaced
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 09:45 PM
Jan 2016

When they ran the untreated Flint water through the pipes, it caused the corrosion that then triggered the lead to leech into the water. Even with the new, treated water going through the pipes, the lead is still leeching.

From what I understand, it will cost over $700,000,000 to replace all of the pipes.

question everything

(47,468 posts)
4. This is terrible.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 10:02 PM
Jan 2016

Would be nice if all the CEOs and Trump with their millions would band together and each contribute, say $10 million. They can even get some tax benefit for this, I don't care.

Jim__

(14,074 posts)
2. I believe Flint is reconnected to Detroit water.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 09:46 PM
Jan 2016

This is from October ( source ):

FLINT, MI -- Water from Detroit is flowing into Flint again.

But it'll be about three weeks before all of the city's pipes are clear of water from the Flint River, city officials said Friday


But, I think the pipes are still leeching lead.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
3. It has been for some time, as I understand it, but the damage is done.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 09:48 PM
Jan 2016

People have been irreparably damaged, along with all the lead pipes, including those in private homes. Everything is broken. To save $140 a day.

FSogol

(45,473 posts)
10. The pipes aren't lead. The higher salinity of the untreated river water
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jan 2016

leaches lead out of the solder and fittings.

The entire boondoggle is the end result of Republican politics, the refusal to improve infrastructure, and brainless cost-cutting. If wish more people would say that since the GOP can take stances of "the Govt f'ed up" and "both sides do it" and pass the buck.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
12. Read this about the lead pipes in homes.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:01 AM
Jan 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141322426
“I hope and pray they start releasing some money,” said homeowner Arthur Woodson, a disabled veteran who lives in a house like many in Flint: built with lead plumbing that, until the city switched to a new water source in 2014, was considered safe.

FSogol

(45,473 posts)
17. That seriously sucks. Here in the DC Metro area, most service lines (the ones prior
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:08 AM
Jan 2016

to 1950 were lead) have been replaced. Anytime major construction is done on a property, the old service lines were replaced. Aside from a few areas, most have been gone since the late '90s. When they replace those pipes, they test the water and then place a filter on the line, to remove the lead/impurities, for 6 months, and then test again.

Texasgal

(17,043 posts)
6. Everything needs replacing.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 10:17 PM
Jan 2016

I've heard that lead can live in pipes for a long time, there will be a residual effect.

New water doesn't solve this issue. I am so angry by all of this!

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
7. Make Gov. Snyder drink a glass every day, until it's fixed.
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 10:18 PM
Jan 2016

I'm all for the Darth Vader school of Motivational Management...

Warpy

(111,242 posts)
8. Chances are the water can be made safe enough to shower in
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 10:40 PM
Jan 2016

and do laundry in but if I lived there, I'd want a water service for drinking and cooking. I don't say that lightly, I've had to live like that and it was not fun and I think anyone who uses bottled water and doesn't have to is nuts. As I understand it, the pipes from water treatment plant to tap would have to be replaced to get all the contaminants out.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
9. The piping is ruined and dangerous. No easy fix because they need replaced with
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 10:51 PM
Jan 2016

new pipes. They say it will cost approx 1.5 billion dollars.

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
11. Lead service lines
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 11:25 PM
Jan 2016

Lead service lines and pipes exist in almost every city in this country. For the most part, over time, pipes become coated with a hard mineral scale on their interior surfaces. This mineral scale forms a buffer between the lead surface of service lines and the lead solder in the joints of older copper pipes and keeps lead from leaching into the water. Municipal water supplies add phosphates to the water to keep that mineral scale intact, as a means of mitigating the presence of lead in old plumbing.

The problem that occurred in Flint was due to the fact that when the switch to Flint River water occurred, the water treatment plant in Flint did not add phosphates to the water, a corrosion control practice called optimization. The lack of phosphates allowed the mineral scale inside the pipes of the water system to erode, exposing the lead underneath and allowing lead to leach into the water.

Now that the water supply has been reconnected to Detroit, the water flowing through the Flint system is once again being treated with phosphates which should prevent further erosion of the interior coating of pipes. Over time mineral scale will again build up, encapsulating the lead and limiting leaching from occurring. In the mean time, potable water should be filtered with filters rated to eliminate lead.

The dirty little secret that nobody in the media has been mentioning yet is that the KWA pipeline is going to be finished this year and sometime in 2016 Flint will be switching over to KWA water as it's new source. While KWA will be drawing water from Lake Huron, the same source as the Detroit water, unlike the Detroit water, the KWA water will not be treated, so it will be up to the Flint Water Treatment Plant to treat the water, including adding phosphates to prevent the same issue as occurred with the Flint River water. It will be interesting to see what happens when that occurs, hopefully this time it will be done correctly and nobody will be put at risk but I doubt there is a lot of confidence in either the Flint Water Department, the DEQ or the EPA, at this point.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
13. Human beings have known for a long time how to transport clean water to cities
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 01:10 AM
Jan 2016

It's not a matter of a scientific conundrum. It is a matter of expense and political will.

Everybody knows what needs to be done.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
15. They know what needs to be done but will they do it?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:06 AM
Jan 2016

And how long will it take them? It' makes me sick that in such a wealthy country, shit like this still persists. There is no excuse for it.

1939

(1,683 posts)
16. Problem isn't the cleanliness of the water
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:57 AM
Jan 2016

The problem is that they didn't "dirty up the water" with phosphates to keep the crappy distribution and household piping from leaching lead into the water.

EPA is currently fighting phosphate runoff from fertilizers into rivers which "shows to go you" that there are a lot of tradeoffs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What can be done about Fl...