Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:41 AM Jan 2016

Higher deductibles do NOT lead to more careful "shopping"

http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2482348

During their last use of medical care, HDHP enrollees were no more likely than enrollees in traditional plans to consider going to another health care professional for their care (n?=?120 [10.9%] vs n?=?85 [10.0%]; P?=?.67), or to compare out-of-pocket cost differences across health care professionals (n?=?42 [3.8%] vs n?=?23 [2.7%]; P?=?.37).

Simply increasing a deductible, which gives enrollees skin in the game, appears insufficient to facilitate price shopping. Members of HDHP and traditional plans are equally likely to price shop for medical care, and they hold similar attitudes about health care prices and quality.


http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2482346

It is true that high-deductible health plan enrollees have “skin in the game.” However, these enrollees are exposed to substantial out-of-pocket cost risk with little evidence that this risk exposure will incentivize higher-value health care decisions, meaning they are essentially playing the game blindfolded with one hand tied behind their back.


Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: This study shows that individuals with high-deductible health plans (HDHP) are no more likely to select their care based on their out-of-pocket costs than do individuals enrolled in traditional health plans without high deductibles. As the editorial states, it is likely that “getting enrollees to make higher-value decisions remains a mirage.”

So high deductibles do not cause patients to be smart shoppers, but they do cause patients to decline beneficial health care services. They also create financial hardships for some patients.

Thus high deductibles have a net negative impact. We should get rid of them. A single payer system is a much more efficient and patient-friendly method of controlling health care spending
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
1. Who the hell wants to go shopping for medical treatment?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:47 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:26 AM - Edit history (1)

When you think about how important people feel that is to "keep your own doctor," the idea that they would go "shop around" is ludicrous.

And I haven't tried it myself but what's the response when you call up a specialists and ask for pricing?

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. Exactly. Makes no more sense than "shopping" for a fire department
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 06:51 AM
Jan 2016

Public goods work differently from market goods.

Habibi

(3,601 posts)
9. If they can even tell you, it will depend
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:25 AM
Jan 2016

on a number of factors: whether you're a new patient, what your complaint is, what location you'll be seen at, type of procedure (if needed), and the location of that.

Also, with mega-hospital corps buying up small practices, it's hard to tell if "shopping" is even worth it (to those that have the time to spend calling around).

High deductible plans (and they all seem to be high-deductible now) don't motivate me to shop around, they motivate me to not get care. Period.

4. I don't understand this at all. "Price Shopping?"
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:11 AM
Jan 2016

Every insurance package I've ever encountered requires that you stay in-group or go it alone. This is asinine.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
5. Ridiculous. My doc says I need a colonoscopy, how do I price shop? The hospitals and docs
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:11 AM
Jan 2016

Do not have prices listed on a 'menu' so I can compare.

Plus, when looking for a cancer doc, I look at qualifications and who has best outcomes, not lowest cost.

The whole "skin in the game" arguement is total bs. What they want to do, in reality, is make it so expensive people DO NOT seek treatment so that the insurance never has to pay out!

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
6. Pfft. We peons don't deserve to look at qualifications and outcomes.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

We're supposed to get our treatment from DocMart. I hear Doctor Nick is running a sale.

Vinca

(51,129 posts)
10. So you're laying on a gurnery at the ER and you've just been told you need bypass surgery.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:15 AM
Jan 2016

At that point they think you should go price shopping??????????????? Bottom line, most people do not have the expertise or time to evaluate the quality or type of medical service they require versus the cost from numerous providers. Stop the madness. Medicare for all.

Monk06

(7,675 posts)
11. Deductibles are designed to provide a period of 100% profit until a claim is made and then the
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:38 AM
Jan 2016

'enrollee' is priced out or denied ensurance outright.

It's a shell game. three card monti, ring toss at a carni sideshow

Fraud pure and simple

Until single payer run federally is instituted, the US does not have a modern health insurance system.

The insurance industry must be cut out of the medical insurance business for basic care, cronic healthcare and surgery just like the UK and Canada. The private market can have the breast enlargments and face jobs

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Higher deductibles do NOT...