A Michigan Congressman Called Federal Disaster Aid Unconstitutional

[muriel_volestrangler]

As he voted against giving people drinking water in Flint, Michigan.

The affection of modern "constitutional conservatives" for the governing principles of the Articles of Confederation remains a delightful puzzlement to those of us who thought most of those issues settled in 1788—or, at the very least, 1865. But Congressman Justin Amash of Michigan continues to amaze and astound. He was the only member of the Michigan caucus in the House of Representatives to vote against federal assistance to the city of Flint with regard to its ongoing water crisis. Here is his reason:

"While the U.S. Constitution does not authorize the federal government to intervene in an intrastate matter like this one, the State of Michigan should provide comprehensive assistance to the people of Flint," Amash said. "The residents who were harmed deserve an independent, nonpartisan investigation, and the persons responsible for this crisis must be held accountable."

The logical fallacy here is that the state of Michigan has demonstrated that it was at first unwilling, and then unable, to provide comprehensive assistance to anyone anywhere, and that it was the state of Michigan, in the person of its incompetent governor, that acknowledged this by requesting the federal aid in the first place. The constitutional fallacy is what we can call Originalism Amok. There is nothing unconstitutional about federal disaster aid, whether that involves the water in Flint, or tornadoes in Alabama, or hurricanes in Florida. That has been established without constitutional challenge ever since the passage of the Federal Disaster Assistance Program in 1950. They are allowed under the spending power the Constitution provides to the national legislature. (In 1984, the general principle of expanding the use of the congressional spending power within the states was allowed by the Supreme Court in South Dakota v. Dole.) This is the difference between constitutional governance and constitutional fetishism.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a41309/justin-amash-federal-aid-flint/

[Turbineguy]

1. Competition for

Gohmert!

[KamaAina]

2. Amash is an ultra-teabagger

I should have known it'd be him.

[JudyM]

3. Though it'd be great to see personal liability for the costs land on the governor's shoulders.

I hate that taxpayers will have to take the hit for his gross negligence.