Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:08 PM Jan 2016

Law Enforcement Confirms Militiamen Are Free To Come and Go From Refuge

Because coddling terrorists worked so well the last time.

Law Enforcement Confirms Militiamen Are Free To Come and Go From Refuge

Their supplies look to be dwindling and militia men who overtook the Malheur Wildlife Refuge in Oregon have pleaded with sympathizers to send food, but law enforcement tell TPM that the men are free to resupply on their own.

"Right now, they are allowed to come and grow as they want," says Bill Fugate, a spokesman for the Oregon State police.

Fugate says that to his knowledge, law enforcement are "not monitoring what they are doing."

...


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/militiamen-able-to-get-food-on-their-own
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Law Enforcement Confirms Militiamen Are Free To Come and Go From Refuge (Original Post) MohRokTah Jan 2016 OP
WTF? This is almost incomprehensible. They've broken laws, sedition, and trespassing at least . . . brush Jan 2016 #1
We are a RABIDLY racist country. Were these BLM folk they would all be dead already. randys1 Jan 2016 #26
To be fair Bettie Jan 2016 #29
Unless...wasn't there one AfAm in the group of assholes at the Nevada Bundy standoff? randys1 Jan 2016 #36
Plus, it gives the Bettie Jan 2016 #37
Let's hope that no Native Americans show up, they would be shot by either the police or LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #55
Really maddening, preposterous! 7wo7rees Jan 2016 #2
You're f'ing kidding me, right? CanonRay Jan 2016 #3
Nope, as far as law enforcement is concerned, these terorists have done nothing wrong. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #4
Just some good old boys, never meanin' no harm IDemo Jan 2016 #5
Are they ryan_cats Jan 2016 #30
Thread winner IDemo Jan 2016 #34
This is so frustrating. drray23 Jan 2016 #6
The groups that had denounced this are starting to come around and support it. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #7
Maybe the FBI is trying to figure out where the other terrorist cells are across the country? Baitball Blogger Jan 2016 #42
HUH??? Takket Jan 2016 #8
Using this situation of a guideline, there should be no more homeless people. All they have to patricia92243 Jan 2016 #64
Well they're white dudes,silly. sufrommich Jan 2016 #9
"Come and grow?" BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #10
Looks to me like the state police have declared this a white man refuge. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #11
He misspoke BeyondGeography Jan 2016 #16
Looks to me like the state police have no dog in this fight Brother Buzz Jan 2016 #23
And yet the FBI is in charge, not the State Troopers. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #35
What about the rest of the public? phantom power Jan 2016 #12
Rightwing white terrorist groups get to terrorize consequence free. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #13
The ONLY purpose I can see in this 2naSalit Jan 2016 #22
No kidding.. The place belongs to you and me just as much as to them. .n/t annabanana Jan 2016 #38
Anyone who doubts that there are two systems of justice Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #14
Imagine a band of black guys at the refuge. Vinca Jan 2016 #15
you want mercuryblues Jan 2016 #18
That would have to be a bunch of BRAVE brothers! annabanana Jan 2016 #39
like this... GreatGazoo Jan 2016 #53
Effing Aholes libodem Jan 2016 #17
I know the list is photoshopped, but is that a pic of one of these brain surgeons? randys1 Jan 2016 #33
Not sure libodem Jan 2016 #41
Yes that is one of the terrorists csziggy Jan 2016 #47
Yeah, that's Ryan Bundy pokerfan Jan 2016 #51
That is one of Bundy's sons, I believe. nt tblue37 Jan 2016 #50
Damn, what twisted soul needs Doritos AND Tostitos??! Number23 Jan 2016 #58
Uh huh libodem Jan 2016 #70
They should at least be 2naSalit Jan 2016 #19
Let them pick up their own snacks. Downwinder Jan 2016 #20
They're just a bunch of rednecks playing soldier in the woods. Oneironaut Jan 2016 #21
Once again topmost management at the Feds defers to white people nt msongs Jan 2016 #24
... Arugula Latte Jan 2016 #25
appalling cali Jan 2016 #27
Do they send in maid service too? world wide wally Jan 2016 #28
Who the fuck is in charge of enforcing the law there? Who the fuck is in charge?? - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #31
The FBI is in charge at the scene. Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #44
No disagreement from me. I am expressing my KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #48
The people in the MOVE building in Philadelphia were free to come and go DefenseLawyer Jan 2016 #32
Absolutely disgusting SHRED Jan 2016 #40
Why isn't law enforcement doing their job? SHRED Jan 2016 #43
I don't think that the Bundy clan are the brightest bulbs Jim Beard Jan 2016 #45
Isn't that nice? gratuitous Jan 2016 #46
Bingo, it's the ideology Fumesucker Jan 2016 #67
This guy is a spokesman for the State Police. Malheur Wildlife Refuge is administered by the Feds. cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #49
Obama has said it is a local law enforcement matter. former9thward Jan 2016 #54
That's nice, the local police don't have the money or man power. dilby Jan 2016 #60
The FBI has offices in every state, as does the Attorney General anigbrowl Jan 2016 #62
No, Obama knows the difference between local and federal. former9thward Jan 2016 #69
The FBI is there, and they are in charge along with other Federal agencies. The local law Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #71
I posted the link. former9thward Jan 2016 #72
Full statement from Oregon Gov. Kate Brown: Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #74
The FBI is there, it has been in multiple news reports anigbrowl Jan 2016 #77
And I don't know how you are ignoring that Obama is saying former9thward Jan 2016 #78
Because I take him to mean local in the geographic rather than jurisdictional sense. anigbrowl Jan 2016 #79
Dream world. former9thward Jan 2016 #80
I think this is the right to deal with these douche bags ribrepin Jan 2016 #52
So in a way law enforcement is saying that it is okay to take over a federal building if you are Rex Jan 2016 #56
If these fuckers were brown or black they would be dead by now. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #57
I'm not so sure about. Native Americans occupied Alcatraz for 19 months in the 1970s. anigbrowl Jan 2016 #63
This is a Federal Problem not a State Problem. dilby Jan 2016 #59
Wow Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 #61
Unbelievable. Are the terrorists armed to the teeth in town too? B Calm Jan 2016 #65
Smart way to handle it- it has to be infuriating to start a standoff and nobody cares Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #66
good post! nt steve2470 Jan 2016 #73
I don't understand why they are upset. Are they upset the government took land away B Calm Jan 2016 #68
so the law only applies to some. got it. spanone Jan 2016 #75
Right-wing freikorps now allowed in U.S. n/t tabasco Jan 2016 #76

brush

(53,743 posts)
1. WTF? This is almost incomprehensible. They've broken laws, sedition, and trespassing at least . . .
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jan 2016

and they are allowed to come and go.

This is way past white privilege, this is acknowledgment of white supremacy — these terrorists are given free reign because of their skin color.

We all know what would happen if they were POC — correction — we all know what would already have happened in they were POC.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
36. Unless...wasn't there one AfAm in the group of assholes at the Nevada Bundy standoff?
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jan 2016

I think there was, so he was safe.

So if you are Black and surround yourself with white racist assholes, you are safe.




Clarence....

Bettie

(16,078 posts)
37. Plus, it gives the
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:13 PM
Jan 2016

assholes a reason to say "See, we're not racists....we have a black guy around here someplace!".

LiberalArkie

(15,703 posts)
55. Let's hope that no Native Americans show up, they would be shot by either the police or
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

the militia or maybe both.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
2. Really maddening, preposterous!
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016

I just keep thinking back to how harsh they (LE) were across the nation taking down all the Occupy camps in parks. WTF?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
4. Nope, as far as law enforcement is concerned, these terorists have done nothing wrong.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

This is systemic white supremacy.

drray23

(7,619 posts)
6. This is so frustrating.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:28 PM
Jan 2016

Why the heck are they given a free pass. These people should be charged with trespassing and probably a zillion other things too. They should be marched to prison, not let go as they wish. It should be obvious to anybody that if you keep letting that kind of stuff slide, the extreme RW lunatics will feel emboldened and keep ratcheting it up until a real massacre happens.
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
7. The groups that had denounced this are starting to come around and support it.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jan 2016

It's too late.

Coddling terrorists = more terrorism.

Takket

(21,529 posts)
8. HUH???
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

Okay... as much as I would love to see the place stormed and these thugs hauled out and given the good spanking they deserve....... I have to admit it is right to just NOT give them the platform they want, to go out in a blaze of glory like Waco. Let them sit there alone until they get bored and go on with their lives.... BUT, how in the world can they be allowed back in if they leave? and how is anyone leaving the property not arrested?????

I mean... if you are allowed to stay there, and come and go as you please.... doesn't that basically mean they own the place? Is it offical, is it just THEIRS now? No arrest, free to come and go.... that's what its like for anyone operating on their own land!

patricia92243

(12,592 posts)
64. Using this situation of a guideline, there should be no more homeless people. All they have to
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:38 AM
Jan 2016

do is choose which building they want to take over. It is then theirs for as long as they want, and they are free to come and go as they please.

Wow! I think I'll choose which building I want. Or does it have to be a group of people (sarcasm)

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
11. Looks to me like the state police have declared this a white man refuge.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jan 2016

Add as many more white terrorists as they want, nothing will happen.

Systemic White Supremacy.

Brother Buzz

(36,389 posts)
23. Looks to me like the state police have no dog in this fight
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

That is, until they're asked to assist in some fashion, and it looks like the tight lipped Feds aren't talking with them.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
35. And yet the FBI is in charge, not the State Troopers.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jan 2016

So the protocols are being set by federal authorities. Anything that's being declared is being declared by the FBI.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
12. What about the rest of the public?
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:45 PM
Jan 2016

Do they get to actually use this public facility, in the way it is intended?

WTF???

2naSalit

(86,369 posts)
22. The ONLY purpose I can see in this
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

lack of control of an illegal occupation of this type is that the rest of the sane citizens will get so pissed at these f'wads that we will shun them, their businesses and public shaming without end... maybe. But that won[t go far since the morons have their own welfare system and will protect these assholes from any consequences.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
14. Anyone who doubts that there are two systems of justice
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

in this country needs to explain this shit. They might for example look at how native Americans with guns were dealt with at wounded knee in 1973.

mercuryblues

(14,525 posts)
18. you want
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jan 2016

to see a quick 180 by law enforcement. A band of armed black dudes should join them and their cause. PS bring the chips and dip.

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
47. Yes that is one of the terrorists
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jan 2016

I think he either got kicked in the face by one of his cows or he went hunting with Dick Cheney.

2naSalit

(86,369 posts)
19. They should at least be
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:55 PM
Jan 2016

cut off and prosecuted for using their tax-funded welfare $$ for illegal purposes like anyone who trades SNAP benefits for drugs, etc. They should also lose all claims to citizenship in the US of A.

I don't like any of this and I see it turning into a civil war by summer if no action is taken soon. hey should at the very least have blocked the road and cut off all communication!!

I mean,

Oneironaut

(5,487 posts)
21. They're just a bunch of rednecks playing soldier in the woods.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

They're not a threat to anyone. Eventually, they'll get tired of living there (I give them two weeks tops) and they'll go away.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
44. The FBI is in charge at the scene.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jan 2016

On a regular day Harney County has a Sheriff, I think 2 deputies maybe 3. Burns has a head cop and two other cops. The county is larger than Vermont. It has about 7,400 people. Oregon State Police have about 400 officers for the entire State, the largest cities being hours away from Harney County. So 400, not all can be on duty all the time and most have to serve the State at large. How many can really go to Harney for the winter?
Oddly, this becomes a very strong demonstration of why a Federal Government comes in handy.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
48. No disagreement from me. I am expressing my
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 04:55 PM
Jan 2016

exasperation that the perps are able to move freely, rather than being placed under arrest for, at the least, trespassing.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
32. The people in the MOVE building in Philadelphia were free to come and go
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

until the police firebombed the building and killed everybody.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
45. I don't think that the Bundy clan are the brightest bulbs
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jan 2016

I think the FBI wants us pissed so they can open carry all kinds of surveillance systems under their noses into the compound.
(Hopefully that is what it is)

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
46. Isn't that nice?
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 02:56 PM
Jan 2016

I'm not advocating for the feds to go into this happy camp guns a-blazing, but wouldn't it be nice if law enforcement offered the same courtesy, deference, and respect to other non-violent citizen protesters? I've read in other precincts of the internets that the feds don't want a repeat of what happened in the aftermath of Ruby Ridge: namely, the bombing - allegedly in retaliation - of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City. So they're handling the folks in Harney County with kid gloves because they know from experience that the ideological compatriots of the Bundy Bunch are capable of acts of mass murder and terrorism as payment in kind for any heavy-handed tactics law enforcement uses.

Playing our favorite game of "let's suppose," Let's suppose that ideological compatriots of Occupy or Black Lives Matter were to set off a bomb that destroyed a federal building and blew a couple of hundred innocents to Kingdom Come; what do you suppose law enforcement's reaction to such an act of terrorism might be? Would law enforcement handle future demonstrations or protests with kid gloves like they do with the Bundy Bunch, or would there be ruthless suppression, complete with military armaments and weaponry, to cut down citizens in the streets?

Think, think.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
49. This guy is a spokesman for the State Police. Malheur Wildlife Refuge is administered by the Feds.
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jan 2016

Would the State Police have jurisdiction? If not, why would they be monitoring anything?

dilby

(2,273 posts)
60. That's nice, the local police don't have the money or man power.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 02:53 AM
Jan 2016

So these guys can do what they want till the Fed's get involved.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
62. The FBI has offices in every state, as does the Attorney General
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:43 AM
Jan 2016

The US attorney for Oregon most likely told the local branch of the FBi to get on it. That's what he means by local. It's definitely federal jurisdiction, the only people who don't think so are the Bundy Bunch.

former9thward

(31,949 posts)
69. No, Obama knows the difference between local and federal.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016

When he says local he means local. That is why the FBI is not there.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
71. The FBI is there, and they are in charge along with other Federal agencies. The local law
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jan 2016

enforcement is about 6 guys. The nearest Federal courthouse to the location is 4.5 hours away. That is a remote county, larger than Vermont with a population a big over 7,000.

former9thward

(31,949 posts)
72. I posted the link.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

Obama says it is a local law enforcement matter. You may not like that but that is what he said.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
74. Full statement from Oregon Gov. Kate Brown:
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:14 PM
Jan 2016

“Although the FBI is the lead agency responding to the situation, my top priority is the safety of the people of Harney County and the City of Burns. The Oregon State Police has enhanced its presence in the area, augmenting local and federal public safety resources and assisting with community outreach. I look for a swift resolution that allows Harney County life to return to normal.”
http://www.opb.org/news/series/burns-oregon-standoff-bundy-militia-news-updates/npr-oregon-governor-wants-swift-resolution-in-harney-county/

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
77. The FBI is there, it has been in multiple news reports
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:28 PM
Jan 2016

They're just keeping a low profile. I don't know how you could have missed this if you were reading any news articles on the topic. http://trofire.com/2016/01/07/fbi-says-oregon-militia-will-face-federal-charges/

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
79. Because I take him to mean local in the geographic rather than jurisdictional sense.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jan 2016

I originally commented because you said the FBI were not involved, and you keep ignoring the news reports saying that they are and even quoting FBI officials. Do you think they are fictional or something, because Obama used the word 'local'?

former9thward

(31,949 posts)
80. Dream world.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:38 AM
Jan 2016

Anyone there there is free to come or leave as they choose. Do you think that would be he case if the FBI were in charge?

ribrepin

(1,725 posts)
52. I think this is the right to deal with these douche bags
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 05:41 PM
Jan 2016

1. Feds are allowing ample time for like-minded pals to join them.

2. You have no media shots of heavily armed police guarding the perimeter and the media blaming the cops for keeping them back.

3. The media is free to walk right into the heavily armed camp and get interviews (see blue tarp man). I think the media will get sick of walking into that nut gathering quickly and not put their reports at risk

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
56. So in a way law enforcement is saying that it is okay to take over a federal building if you are
Wed Jan 6, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

of the white, RWing anti-government armed to the teeth type? That is a pretty dangerous message to send out imo.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
63. I'm not so sure about. Native Americans occupied Alcatraz for 19 months in the 1970s.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:52 AM
Jan 2016

When there's been no violence and no lives at stake there is not such a big hurry to shoot it out. I initially had the exact same thought as you but when I went to look up examples I was surprised to find that these things usually unfold slowlyregardless of who's involved or whether it ends peacefully or not.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
59. This is a Federal Problem not a State Problem.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 02:51 AM
Jan 2016

The county these guys are in doesn't have the money or resources to have state or local police dealing with these guys. The Federal Government can fund the necessary force to deal with these guys.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
66. Smart way to handle it- it has to be infuriating to start a standoff and nobody cares
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 08:28 AM
Jan 2016

What these idiots want is a standoff, tension and the publicity.

Now they went and did the "takeover" that was of empty buildings and nobody cared enough to respond. Its like ignoring a petulant child throwing a tantrum and not giving them the response they crave.

Rest assured that there are lots of assets in place keeping tabs on them. You can bet they are monitoring every form of electronic communication in and out of the place, gathering intel and forming plans as to when and how to arrest them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Law Enforcement Confirms ...