General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm an American, but I swear sometimes I just don't "get" America.....
Americans support for banning assault weapons, once near-universal, is now at a record low, a new survey shows.
President Barack Obama renewed his call for such a ban earlier this month, saying in a speech that the U.S. needs to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the ones that were used in San Bernardino.
But in a Washington Post/ABC News poll released Wednesday morning, just 45 percent want to ban the weapons, down from 80 percent in 1994.
Support for such a ban has decreased in the past two decades, though a majority still backed one as recently as two years ago.
The increase in opposition to banning assault weapons since 2013 peaks in some groups -- up 18 points among strong conservatives, 17 points among higher-income earners and 16 points in the generally more liberal Northeast. But its a broadly based trend, pollster Gary Langer noted. ..................(more)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/assault-weapons-ban-poll_56715c23e4b0dfd4bcbff62e
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Then gave the entire congress to republicans after that vote. Something doesn't fit.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)should not be a bit surprised.
The problem is how to turn them off. Every time anything happens they add more to the message.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Perhaps that's where the start needs to be. Our message. Cuz nothing else is working.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)media against us is a real problem. We do still have the internet.....
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Majority of Americans get everything from the Internet. So maybe we are in a weird transition period and things will begin to change.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)neutrality.
valerief
(53,235 posts)RKP5637
(67,102 posts)be in the tops. Joseph Goebbels would have loved it. It's become so orchestrated and lemmings are all over the place.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)the young. Disney and the cartoons.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)PufPuf23
(8,764 posts)Our government, courts, and politicians have failed to allow such consolidation.
We cannot have a true nor functioning Democratic Republic with such media consolidation.
I am for a major move to break up media monopolies (and for assault weapon bans).
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)uncomfortable these days.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)We didn't.
Waldorf
(654 posts)rifles are used in a very small amount of murders. That's all rifles, ie: bolt action, rimfires, single shots and the scary black rifle (which is not an assault weapon but a semi-auto rifle). If you look at this FBI chart shotguns are used more than rifles. Even knives are used 5x more than rifles.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2009-2013.xls
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Waldorf
(654 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Waldorf
(654 posts)time, disagree with you.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)former NBA president's kid, brought up in gun culture, who shot a motorist in road rage incident. Gun owners have contributed to killings, shootings, intimidation, and degradation of our society, all because they can't sleep at night or go to the grocery store without a gun in their pants.
And don't kid yourself, Zman was a responsible gun owners according to you guys before he shot an innocent teen. Far too many gunners think he was still responsible after murdering the unarmed teen.
I prefer the 200+M who don't need guns to thrive.
Waldorf
(654 posts)snuggled up with a firearm (they are in the safes) but because I'm tired.
Since Zman (as you call him) was not convicted of a crime, and the DOJ wouldn't even file civil charges I would say he was a responsible gun owner.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Waldorf
(654 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Josh Sugarman, VPC (Now the Brady bunch.)
When your support depends on keeping people confused, yer doin it rong.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Keep one or two at home for hunting and home defense. Any other reason is questionable, especially public toting.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=45338
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)at remember the context. In this case, you gungeoneers were foaming at the mouth to add another erroneous rule-of-thumb to your list of reasons to shoot people and cheer.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)You're not fooling anyone here, Hoyt.
I hope you like your words, I'll be sure to remind you of them when I see you sticking up for your ex-co-workers.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)obsessed with guns.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)I guess he got out of the business because it was too dangerous. Remove the danger, and it's a lucrative business.
IsItJustMe
(7,012 posts)Guit believing in polls. PERIOD. Who conducted it? How was it conducted? Who was polled?
Many polls today are dishonest and are simply used as propaganda instruments. Even a honest poll can easily be off as much as 3 to 4 % one way or the other. That means that they could be wrong by as much as 8%.
Good honest polls can be conducted, but they need to have a very large sampling size to be accurate. And if you want to know if a poll is honest, you almost have to be a statistician to know for sure. Just me humble opinion.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)to "Good Guys With a Gun-in-waiting" like the Luby's survivor who testified about the Christmas Story fantasy she'd had
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)We've seen a full-court press on this since San Bernardino. MSNBC had a gun control advocate on during the actual shootout, before the bodies were even cold.
The polls consistently show Americans are in favor of reasonable gun control. Not blanket bans.
So keep opposing voters and see how that goes.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)we've been subject to unrelenting psyops and propaganda for decades that the 2nd Amendment was about an individual right to arms, and it influenced opinion.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)perhaps I absorbed too much foreign media lately, but it just seems so alien that people are so fearful of those around them that they think that carrying a gun around is a good idea.
maxsolomon
(33,285 posts)Essentially, it's a personal Arms Race. You WANT (aka "need" a gun because you believe everyone else has one.
The more guns there are, the greater the chance of a fuck up, even if the per-capita rate of fuck ups declines.
And no gun owner ever thinks they're going to be the fuck up, but someone is, inevitably. And it's not those of us without guns.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)not even factoring in carrying the damn thing around, you are more likely to be a victim of a homicide or suicide with that gun that's in your house than using it for defense against strangers trying to break in or something.
maxsolomon
(33,285 posts)as well as getting the thing stolen and it entering the black market.
I'm very inclusive!
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)the thing is that gunowners are a minority, thankfully. Hopefully we can have that number shrink over time.