General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWarren and Sanders just voted throw Social Security and Medicare recipients under the bus...
....according to DU.
A few days ago, many folks here were going ballistic over the budget deal compromise reached between the White House and Congress. People claimed Obama was slashing Social Security and Medicare yada yada yada.
Well, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren just voted for the budget deal.
I wonder if people here will have the same reaction to their support for the bill.
For some reason, I doubt it.
Carry on.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)and their responses are more often embarrassing rather than enlightening.
dhill926
(16,337 posts)Flying Phoenix
(114 posts)The fix for SS is in, so I'm happy.
pampango
(24,692 posts)given the support it received from both of them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)but not just now. At some point next year he will endorse Hillary then all bets are off.
djean111
(14,255 posts)So, fail.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I really don't care who you vote for in the primaries or the GE.
Do whatever the hell you want.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)everybody knows that you won't rest until all of DU is smiling over a Hillary Presidency.
The amazing power you wield is like Thor's hammer but for making people vote the way you want them to.
because some people just won't get it without the little smily.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Just pointlessly amusing your self, throwing pot-shots?
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)RichGirl
(4,119 posts)So many didn't like Gore. So much so that they voted for Nader.
Question everyone needs to ask themselves: Would you rather be right or would you rather be happy.
P.S. Nader voters weren't happy with 8 years of Bush.
djean111
(14,255 posts)assumption that she will of course be the candidate just as much. Sorry, but the thought that this was always a done deal turns me completely off of politics. Democracy? Dead. Money and power will have won. No need for further help from me, I am not going to be an enabler.
Besides, if Hillary already has this thing sewn up, my little old white woman vote is not needed, eh?
And yeah, I would quit DU.
Oh, and Gore would have won if the election was not stolen, if Gore would have fought - you are giving Nader way too much credit, and it really looks like you are already looking for a scapegoat when Hillary loses.
End of conversation.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I look forward to the drawings of a distinction without a difference.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)When it was reported that the deal included a 20% cut in Social Security, for example -- which
turned out to not be the case in the final deal -- there was an understandable outcry about that.
Sad that this then gets mis-used to snipe at Sanders supporters. oh well.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)waited to read what it said. (as did the majority of Clinton supporters)
but it is good to see that Bernie's support is considered the gold standard for this sort of thing
Faux pas
(14,668 posts)the cuts are to double dipping couples. It's called file and suspend. http://www.socialsecuritychoices.com/info/fileandsuspend.php
If that's the case, I'm fine with it. I'm only dipping once.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Faux pas
(14,668 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,602 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027302619
Also there will now be ONE uniform code for disability. No more different rules from state to state. I posted it a couple days ago. Bernie voted the way I wanted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/us/politics/congress-and-white-house-near-deal-on-budget.html
Snip: Aides said the Social Security Disability Insurance program would be amended, in part to tighten and standardize eligibility requirements that now vary by state. That change was projected to save the government $5 billion.
In addition, the accord will call for eliminating a provision of the Affordable Care Act, not yet in force, that would require businesses with more than 200 employees to automatically enroll their workers for health insurance.
The emerging deal would also reallocate funds among Social Security program trust funds to ensure solvency of the disability insurance program. Such reallocations have occurred regularly over the decades but Republicans had opposed any new reallocation without changes to reduce costs of the program.
The prospective agreement would also prevent expected increases in out-of-pocket costs for millions of Medicare Part B beneficiaries. The increases would have been caused by the rare absence of a cost-of-living increase in Social Security for some beneficiaries, because of unusually low inflation.
Faux pas
(14,668 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)...it seems some reports claimed the deal included terrible cuts. NCPSSM explained why that isn't so...I posted about the confusion (MY confusion, admittedly, and apparently others as well) yesterday. . .
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027299410
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)...can't remember now.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Pass on both.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)wherein he excoriated Hillary over her dishonest attack on Sanders' votes; specifically the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). Black is a pretty lefty, counter-culture type, and knew a stinker when he saw it. And that issue was a Stinker.
lark
(23,097 posts)Once they knew that the compromise actually protected SSI disability and Medicare, the concern went away.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Fly off the handle with little to no information. It happens time and again.
Jo
This place likes to pretend facts matter but this is just another example where they don't.
What matters here is bloggers interpretation of facts.
It's sad, but not really surprising.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Maddow, Warren and I are currently sipping tea under it. It's an amazing group of people.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)there has to be organized efforts from the Hillary campaign and probably Bill acting in his dirty politics way to come up with this Bull Shit like this..
The Bernie Sanders vote on the Budget was explained on his Web Site.
When I say organized effort I mean just that.Just like the Karl Rove tactics used on progressive site in 2004 and 2008 where he encourage freepers to visit those sites and stir up shit.
You know what Hillary supporters your tactics are working because negative posts are not going unnoticed.
Bernie Sanders talked about the SS and Medicare being included in the Budget at two of his rally's and said it was totally unacceptable.
Hillary supporters you are desperate.
Will i get an alert for this?
tweetybird
(7 posts)These permanent cuts were pushed through so fast that it is understandable that there was conflicting information. This is a big deal to those of us on SSDI as our only income. SSI is similar to a welfare program as it is for people who have not paid in enough to receive benefits and they receive a flat benefit amount. SSDI is based on what you paid in and is essentially what you would get at full retirement.
I am reading that they are changing it to a flat benefit of 130% of poverty level. Could this be treating SSDI more like a welfare like program so that they could make further cuts to it in the future?
For me that will be a benefit cut of $140 a month for me a single person that is huge!! Does anyone know if this is true? The specifics of this bill are a big deal for those of us on SSDI so please tread lightly.
Did Sanders and Warren take the time to know the specifics of the cuts? From what I understand the way it was written is very confusing and took time to fully understand.
librechik
(30,674 posts)I'll try to find a link, but I think we are safe momentarily.
librechik
(30,674 posts)"The emerging deal would also reallocate funds among Social Security program trust funds to ensure solvency of the disability insurance program. Such reallocations have occurred regularly over the decades but Republicans had opposed any new reallocation without changes to reduce costs of the program."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/us/politics/congress-and-white-house-near-deal-on-budget.html?_r=0
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)It will hurt middle class families...but there are so few left it doesn't matter to most DUers.