Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats who voted for TPP "fast track" (Original Post) SHRED Oct 2015 OP
Shame what greed does. Octafish Oct 2015 #1
Otherwise known as the Blue Dog all star team. yourout Oct 2015 #2
Yet these same Democrats will claim they are fighting for the little guy davidn3600 Oct 2015 #3
Yes. Total bullshit. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #7
They say the words but their actions speak clear. zeemike Oct 2015 #9
Bullshit with whipped cream and a cherry on top. Scuba Oct 2015 #42
We have more in the Senate that would have if they were needed. stillwaiting Oct 2015 #4
BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! On top of everything else, KABUKI reigns. merrily Oct 2015 #45
All I need to do is look for the candidates who are running jwirr Oct 2015 #5
no one is going to run against bennet fizzgig Oct 2015 #38
Yeah, I know that they are better than the pukes. And there jwirr Oct 2015 #52
Even if you donate to a liberal, your money gets to the Blue Dogs/DINOs anyway. merrily Oct 2015 #44
I actually understand helping a conservative Democrat in jwirr Oct 2015 #53
Did they all endorse Clinton? nt haikugal Oct 2015 #6
I bet they did. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #8
But but but.. They have a D next to their name! DemByDefault Oct 2015 #10
He doesn't have a D next to his name nxylas Oct 2015 #11
The horror!!! DemByDefault Oct 2015 #12
Whoosh! cui bono Oct 2015 #34
Camp Weathervane... SammyWinstonJack Oct 2015 #15
+1 closeupready Oct 2015 #19
That was my first thought. Cassiopeia Oct 2015 #25
mccaskill is big clinton surrogate restorefreedom Oct 2015 #33
Is the revolving door waiting in the wings? DhhD Oct 2015 #51
Here in Florida, Bill Nelson will never get another vote from me. djean111 Oct 2015 #13
I live in Canada... Thespian2 Oct 2015 #23
He is also almost useless in getting help for his constituents... JCMach1 Oct 2015 #28
Both my republites senators! Grrr. Duppers Oct 2015 #14
Not one surprise there. I knew Bennet would be there. Autumn Oct 2015 #16
Did you know Jeanne Shaheen would vote for Fast Track? NT Eric J in MN Oct 2015 #22
I will never vote for Bennet. Cassidy Oct 2015 #29
Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author yallerdawg Oct 2015 #24
Cantwell, Carper, Feinstein, Murray, Nelson and Wyden are all also yes votes on both NAFTA and Bluenorthwest Oct 2015 #18
The liberals of the great state of Washington are not proud. Of course Sen Cantwell was rhett o rick Oct 2015 #32
We need Senator DeFazio representing Oregon in 2016!!! cascadiance Oct 2015 #39
Isn't Jeanne Shaheen a liberal? Why did she vote for Fast Track? NT Eric J in MN Oct 2015 #20
She plays one on TV sarge43 Oct 2015 #41
Depends on what your definition of "liberal" is. merrily Oct 2015 #46
Liars and traitors. (nm) Elwood P Dowd Oct 2015 #21
There significant support among Democratic voters for it, so it's not too surprising that pampango Oct 2015 #26
This is not about TPP per se. but about fast track. merrily Oct 2015 #48
Granted, though polls show Democrats more supportive of 'fast track' too. pampango Oct 2015 #54
See my prior reply. merrily Oct 2015 #55
Keep an eye on them fredamae Oct 2015 #27
Another Fein mess. nt mhatrw Oct 2015 #30
The usual suspects. hobbit709 Oct 2015 #31
DiFi.. cui bono Oct 2015 #35
Yeah, I was not surprised to see her name denbot Oct 2015 #36
DiFi made a big deal about pushing an assault weapons ban after Sandy Hook which was filibustered... cascadiance Oct 2015 #40
The Party protects incumbents. Three words: Lieberman v. Lamont. merrily Oct 2015 #49
I am so mad artislife Oct 2015 #37
I'd like to know what their logic was...if any KansDem Oct 2015 #43
Wonder what they say that we didn't? Maybe the agreement? Maybe they have more info than we do? n kelliekat44 Oct 2015 #47
$$$$$$ Also, fast track authority is the subject of the thread, not the merrily Oct 2015 #50
Marta and I have donated to several of them in the past Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #56

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. Shame what greed does.
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 10:17 AM
Oct 2015

Certainly blurred the hell out of the line between Democrats and Republicans.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
9. They say the words but their actions speak clear.
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 11:36 AM
Oct 2015

And I suppose we are to blame because we seem satisfied with just the words.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
4. We have more in the Senate that would have if they were needed.
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 10:54 AM
Oct 2015

We need to take back the Party from the New Democrats.

They've been ridiculously effective in changing the Party to BECOME New Democrats.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
5. All I need to do is look for the candidates who are running
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 11:24 AM
Oct 2015

against these traitors to know who I want to donate to in the primary season. Heitcamp keeps sending me donation requests. NO WAY.

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
38. no one is going to run against bennet
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 12:48 AM
Oct 2015

he was challenged in 2010 and the party establishment threw everything behind him.

i hate that i have to say this, but he's still better than a puke and colorado is swinging right again. i didn't think udall would lose to gardner last year, but oh boy howdy, was i wrong.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
52. Yeah, I know that they are better than the pukes. And there
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:30 AM
Oct 2015

are others on that list who are going to make it with or without our donations because they are "inevitable".

When our own party is obstructing democracy we are in big trouble.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
53. I actually understand helping a conservative Democrat in
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:45 AM
Oct 2015

some place like Nebraska. It is all about being the majority in the House and Senate which is important because we get to run the committees, etc..

But to do it behind our backs with no explanation. I am really beginning to feel like a name on a list of suckers instead of an American voter.

The supposed leaders of this party are all jumping up to follow the inevitable leader without one thought to the voters. Who cares what the voters think. Last night I emailed all of my endorsers and gave them a piece of my mind. When they take over the selection of our nominee this early they are working against the people - those of us who bother to go to the caucuses and elections and try to have a say.

This morning I am in a "F you" attitude toward the whole party leadership because that is what they are saying to us.

 

DemByDefault

(40 posts)
10. But but but.. They have a D next to their name!
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 11:39 AM
Oct 2015

I read here the other day from a Camp Weathervane surrogate that all u have to do is look at the letter beside ones name. If it's an R then they are evil and never to be trusted! But as long as one has a D beside the name then we should have complete faith in their judgment at all times! Every one,
except that terrible gun nut Bernie fella!!!1! (Ewww)

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
11. He doesn't have a D next to his name
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 11:57 AM
Oct 2015

At least half of all Camp Weathervane's criticisms of him centre on his refusal to wear the team jersey.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. Here in Florida, Bill Nelson will never get another vote from me.
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 12:04 PM
Oct 2015

I now use the membership list of the New Democrat Coalition as my guide to DINOs. Senate version and US version. Wasserman-DINO and Patrick Murphy are on that list, as is Gwen Graham.
They have scrubbed up their agenda, but they are advised by members of the Third Way.
NO MORE VOTES. For those who voted for it, or shilled for the TPP.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
23. I live in Canada...
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 12:48 PM
Oct 2015

but as an American citizen, I vote in Florida...

My list of unfavourables matches yours...I, too, will not vote for anyone in the New Democrat Coalition..or any 1%er for that matter...

JCMach1

(27,553 posts)
28. He is also almost useless in getting help for his constituents...
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 01:18 PM
Oct 2015

With an issue I had two years back, I actually had to work with Rubio's office to get something done. They were extremely pro-active and helpful. Nelson's people, CRICKETS.

Cassidy

(201 posts)
29. I will never vote for Bennet.
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 01:24 PM
Oct 2015

Appointing Bennet is the worst mistake Governor Ritter made. When the multimillionaire, son-of-an-ambassador Bennet campaigned around Colorado, feigning to be some up-by-his-own-bootstraps log-cabin-building everyman, I knew he would not be supporting regular people.

I contacted Bennet's office a few months ago with my concern that the generic medicine I need to live tripled in price over the previous 8 months and asking him to support Senator Sanders and Rep. Cummings investigations. I got a form letter about how great Obamacare is. Fine, Obamacare is great, but if people can't afford their meds, they will die in spite of Obamacare. (My medicine has now quadrupled in price in 12 months.)

I have done my share of voting for the lesser of evils, but I will never vote for Bennet. I hope he loses his seat next year, even if to a Republican, so a real Democrat can take it back in 6 years.

Response to SHRED (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #17)

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
18. Cantwell, Carper, Feinstein, Murray, Nelson and Wyden are all also yes votes on both NAFTA and
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 12:20 PM
Oct 2015

CAFTA, having been present in either the House or the Senate for all three votes. I point this out because many DUers were very surprised by their votes, which were actually very predictable votes.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
32. The liberals of the great state of Washington are not proud. Of course Sen Cantwell was
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 10:26 PM
Oct 2015

a member of the DLC so we might expect her to sell the 99% down the drain, but Sen Murray, I expected more. Damn them both and damn the Oligarchy.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
26. There significant support among Democratic voters for it, so it's not too surprising that
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 01:01 PM
Oct 2015

some Democratic politicians would be for it.



http://www.people-press.org/2015/10/02/contrasting-partisan-perspectives-on-campaign-2016/

Among Democrats and "Democratic leaners" there was support for 'expanding trade agreements' by 45% to 19%. Republicans and 'republican leaners' were less likely to support a candidate that 'expanded trade agreements'.

TPP is not specifically mentioned in the poll, though.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
48. This is not about TPP per se. but about fast track.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 08:53 AM
Oct 2015

As far as TPP itself:

As if the average voter knows what it is or what it does.

As if House and Senate acts based on how constiutents poll.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12777036


Please.

This is a top down selling job. There was never a grass roots up movement for TPP.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
54. Granted, though polls show Democrats more supportive of 'fast track' too.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 10:16 AM
Oct 2015
As if the average voter knows what it is or what it does.

That is true for supporters and opponents, Democrats and republicans alike. It will be interesting to see how the details of the final agreement affect these numbers.

Without 'fast track' the provisions that are angering Big Tobacco and Big Pharma would undoubtedly be changed by the republican congress along with any other liberal aspects of the agreement. While provisions that liberals would like to see added to the agreement would, of course, never pass through congress.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
27. Keep an eye on them
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 01:15 PM
Oct 2015

now that they've promoted and passed Fast Track...Dems votes are no longer needed, most likely for the Up/Down vote coming up....

So, perhaps one plan is to allow us time to forget about these corporatist democrats going Against their respective states citizen majority position in Opposition-so then they can be the Progressive Hero's when that -likely way down the road and buffered by Tons of other crises and scandals-up/down vote actually happens.
HRC in recent statements re: TPP is leading the way and blazing that trail on their behalf.

I don't trust a single one of these dem arses and I am not surprised by their support and PUSH for TPP.
They are truly the bottom of the barrel - politically speaking - and "we" all deserve better.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
40. DiFi made a big deal about pushing an assault weapons ban after Sandy Hook which was filibustered...
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 01:46 AM
Oct 2015

... and at the same time in that start of a new senate, voted AGAINST Merkley's rule changes attempting to shut down the filibuster. So did she really want just the theater for her bill and WANT it to not pass? Me thinks so! That is the kind of senator she is. More what's behind the scenes than what she does for the people of this country.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
49. The Party protects incumbents. Three words: Lieberman v. Lamont.
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 08:55 AM
Oct 2015

And that is only one example.

The party will also protect the more conservative Democrat.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
37. I am so mad
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 12:42 AM
Oct 2015

at Murray and Cantwell. I sent letters to both. Never hear anything but more donation pleas. Eff em.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. $$$$$$ Also, fast track authority is the subject of the thread, not the
Mon Oct 12, 2015, 08:59 AM
Oct 2015

terms of the TPP agreement.

Omaha Steve

(99,503 posts)
56. Marta and I have donated to several of them in the past
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 04:15 PM
Oct 2015

We are keeping this list! Thanks for posting.

K&R!

OS
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate Democrats who vote...