Some info on the mother of the baby used in one of the Planned Parenthood videos.

And Carley has said there's a video but many say there isn't? Which is it?

but absolutely not what Carly described and took place in a hospital, not a PP, the baby in question was from a premature birth at 19 weeks, and lived only a few minutes. No abortion took place. The video clip was first obtained by the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform and later used by the Center for Medical Progress, PP had nothing to do with the video.

She says she didn't give permission for it to be used, that she knows they lifted it illegally, but that she isn't going to do anything about it. Yes, she is a religious zealot, herself. http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/08/20/3693340/planned-parenthood-video-photos/

What matters here is that it was an extremely premature normal delivery of a non viable fetus.

It was not an aborted fetus.

CMP needs to be sued into a cardboard box under a bridge for slander.

she allowed this, even gave Carly permission to use it, knowing it would be used deceptively. Her facebook page exposes the whole scam and while I can sympathize with the tragic loss of her baby, to allow his image to be used this way is sick.

I think she needed to be exposed, too, to tell people just what the circumstances of that photo actually were.

Because she's a religious zealot, she honestly thinks she's going to give her dead baby's life meaning by allowing liars to use his image.

Religious doublethink like this is always sick.

While she's so religious, she's allowing the death of her baby to be part of a huge lie. And sadly this lie could hurt millions of women who depend on services from Planned Parenthood. I know she'll admit to nothing, just like that dope in Kentucky, but it will expose Carly for the liar she is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thou_shalt_not_bear_false_witness_against_thy_neighbour

The Hebrew Bible contains a number prohibitions of false witness, lying, spreading false reports, etc. A charge was established only on the evidence of two or three witnesses. In cases where false testimony was suspected, the judges were to make a thorough investigation, and if false testimony were proven, the false witness was to receive the punishment he had intended to bring on the person falsely accused. For example, since murder was a capital crime, giving false testimony in a murder case was subject to the death penalty. Those eager to receive or listen to false testimony were also subject to punishment.

False witness is among the six things God hates, king Solomon says. False testimony is among the things that defile a person, Jesus says.

the mother also needs to be named as a co-defendant in the $(every cent this anti-abortion group has, plus one just to be sure we got it all) lawsuit Planned Parenthood needs to file, tout suite.

and has to be insane to allow her babies image to be used in such a horrible way.

this woman is sick.

http://fusion.net/story/186807/the-latest-anti-planned-parenthood-video-uses-an-unrelated-photo-of-a-stillborn-infant

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/our-son-lived-only-minutes-after-birth-but-has-touched-thousands

https://f2photographybylexi.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/walter-joshua-fretz/

So -- she gave birth to a 19-week infant that did not survive. No 19-week fetus/infant can survive outside the womb. She allowed video and photos to be taken of the dead infant, including a photo of her daughter holding the little girl's "dead brother." She then allowed the video and photos to be used to slam Planned Parenthood.

The words "sick" and "evil" are not adequate to describe this woman. She's a deranged Jesus freak.

Can you imagine the nightmares the little girl will have??

There is a word of difference between a baby born so prematurely it cannot possibly live, and an abortion. No matter where you stand on the abortion continuum.

I can understand a woman saying she would never have an abortion under any circumstances. That's the whole point of choice. Some women will choose one thing, others another under the exact same conditions.

A personal example. When I was pregnant with my second child, in my late 30's, I declined testing for Down Syndrome. My ob-gyn was surprised, as was my mother. My husband didn't really express an opinion. I felt that having a child with Down Syndrome was not the end of the world, and I could deal with such a child. As it happens, my son was born without that, completely normal.

If anyone reading this would make a different choice under identical circumstances, THAT IS WHAT CHOICE IS ALL ABOUT.

Another related example. Some years back I knew a woman whose first child died from Tay-Sachs. I knew her because her second child was in my oldest son's class. She was understandably very protective of that child. I cannot recall if she indicated to me if she'd have aborted a second pregnancy, and the child tested for Tay-Sachs, but that's not the point. My husband is Ashkenazi Jew, which means he has a high likelihood of carrying that gene. When I was pregnant with our first, I insisted he be tested for that gene. He was rather offended, but I told him that had I married an African American, I'd have him tested for the sickle cell trait. And if either (one hypothetical) partner tested positive, then I'd have myself tested for that trait. In any case, my Jewish husband did not test positive, and all was well.

Again, others would choose differently, and again, THAT IS WHAT CHOICE IS ALL ABOUT.

I agree, this is what choice is all about. The photos in question were not about choice, abortion or even Planned Parenthood and need to be exposed for what they really are, a premature birth where the fetus couldn't survive outside the womb.

I also applaud your choice, thank-you for sharing your story!