Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:16 AM Jun 2015

Mea Culpa- I confused Justice Alito's dissent with Justice Scalia's...





Justice Alito-


Gays shouldn't be allowed to marry because SCOTUS approval invalidates its opponent's opposition to marriage equality and in the absence of SCOTUS approval they will feel marginalized:


"By imposing its own views on the entire country, the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas. Recalling the harsh treatment of gays and lesbians in the past, some may think that turnabout is fair play. But if that sentiment prevails, the Nation will experience bitter and lasting wounds,"

-Samuel Alito
[

Good gawd, that's a stupid argument even to a plebeian like me.


The Supreme Court is there to interpret the law, not to validate people's feelings, especially homophobes.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. it is allowing for the right of some people to bully others.
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jun 2015

wouldn't want to take that right away - just imagine if all laws were looked at that way.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
2. I would ask him to cite the line in the Constitution where I have the right for all my opinions....
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:26 AM
Jun 2015

I would ask him to cite the line in the Constitution where I have the right for all my opinions to be popular ones.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
3. on the positive side - three of the dissenting opinions sucked, were amazingly stupid and ignorant
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:29 AM
Jun 2015

and just plain wrong. Judges who are an embarrassment to the bench. haven't read the fourth, yet.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
6. Agreed. It seems that once extreme right wing judges get job security they can just blurt out
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jun 2015

any irrational shit that pops into their imbecilic brains and drop the pretense of basing their decisions on the rule of law.

brush

(53,767 posts)
11. Yeah, makes one wonder . . .
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jun 2015

how did those three get to the Supreme Court with that kind of reasoning.

Aren't they supposed to be the most brilliant legal minds in the country?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. At first I misattributed the quote to Antonin Scalia.
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:05 AM
Jun 2015

When I looked to attribute the quote I discovered it was Alito.

Kber

(5,043 posts)
10. Jeebus
Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:48 AM
Jun 2015

we can't provide equal protection under the law because some "traditionalist" might get his feelings hurt if we don't legally continue to discriminate?

That's fucked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mea Culpa- I confused Jus...