Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolitifact checks Bernie Sanders' income inequality statement.
Bernie Sanders says income inequality is widest since the 1920s
Sen. Bernie Sanders campaign for the 2016 Democratic nomination has focused on the gap between rich and poor. Sanders recently tweeted that the income inequality is wider than its been in a long time -- a very long time.
"The gap between the very rich and everyone else in America is wider today than at any time since the 1920s," Sanders tweeted from his @BernieSanders account on June 4, 2015, after his first campaign trip to Iowa.
But is the inequality gap really that big?
....
Our ruling
Sanders said, "The gap between the very rich and everyone else in America is wider today than at any time since the 1920s." One commonly used method supports that argument -- at least for one recent year, 2012. However, its worth noting that this method tends to widen income differences more than other approaches do. On balance, we rate Sanders statement Mostly True.
Politifact
So why is it Mostly True instead of True? Because the method Politifact cited was crapped on for not including Social Security income, Unemployment benefits, panhandling and dumpster diving so it's possible that income inequality might not be that large.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1161 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politifact checks Bernie Sanders' income inequality statement. (Original Post)
Capt. Obvious
Jun 2015
OP
To be honest, if I fact-checked Bernie, I would come up to a similar conclusion
AZ Progressive
Jun 2015
#2
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Politi-Flawed.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)2. To be honest, if I fact-checked Bernie, I would come up to a similar conclusion
That Bernie, even though he is perhaps the most vigorous defender of the 99% in Congress, isn't perfect and has been a disappointment at times. I need only point to what some Socialists have been saying about Bernie.
cali
(114,904 posts)4. you mean the conclusion that it's mostly true?
Of course he's not perfect. But do you actually believe anyone is?
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)3. Cool
Also love to see people shoot the messenger because it doesn't fit their narrative.
Bernie couldn't possibly be mistaken about anything, right?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)5. He has a mixed record at politifact:
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/bernie-s/
But most politicians do have a mixed record. He actually hasn't had many statements fact-checked.
But most politicians do have a mixed record. He actually hasn't had many statements fact-checked.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)7. That damn Rachel Maddow always shooting the messenger
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=rachel+maddow+politifact+site:+msnbc.com
Here's one of my favorite episodes of her shooting the messenger because it doesn't fit her narrative.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/politifact-fails-again-destroy-277552195924
Here's one of my favorite episodes of her shooting the messenger because it doesn't fit her narrative.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/politifact-fails-again-destroy-277552195924
jwirr
(39,215 posts)6. Thank you for the last statement. Those items IMO would have made the divide even greater.
KelleyKramer
(8,958 posts)8. Politifact is full of it
I wouldn't even bother with them