Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:44 AM May 2012

FAA warns man who took video of bird strike with iPad

A flock of birds flew into a plane’s engine, a frightening incident with shadows of the 2009 Hudson River landing, but the FAA is more worried about … a guy who didn’t properly stow his electronics for takeoff.

Delta passenger Grant Cardone says he has received a strongly worded letter from the FAA over his video of the bird strike on a New York-Los Angeles flight on April 19. Cardone was filming the plane’s ascent from John F. Kennedy airport when a flock of geese flew into the plane’s engine, causing an emergency landing back at JFK.

Boing Boing equates the letter to “double secret probation.” James Giles, FAA supervisory principal operations inspector, warns that Cardone’s actions “could have affected the safe outcome of the flight,” and:

We have given consideration to all of the facts. In lieu of legal enforcement action (a civil penalty), we are issuing this letter which will be made a matter of record for a period of two years, after which, the record will be expunged.


more
http://blog.sfgate.com/hottopics/2012/05/03/faa-warns-man-who-took-video-of-bird-strike-with-ipad/
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FAA warns man who took video of bird strike with iPad (Original Post) n2doc May 2012 OP
OMFG! NOT into his "Permanent Record! BiggJawn May 2012 #1
I haven't flown for years SoutherDem May 2012 #2
Airplane mode is for when you're at cruising altitutde jeff47 May 2012 #3
Good to know. n/t SoutherDem May 2012 #4
if personal electronics had the potential to screw with a plane.. frylock May 2012 #5
Don't. Give. Them. IDEAS!!! Zalatix May 2012 #6
Just repeating the FAA's logic. Not endorsing it. jeff47 May 2012 #7
+1 nt Javaman May 2012 #8
Sounds like defective avionics... backscatter712 May 2012 #9
And just who would be paying for this? Angleae May 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Angleae May 2012 #12
They do. Every single cable in a plane is insulated. joshcryer May 2012 #14
"...after which, the record will be expunged." Gold Metal Flake May 2012 #10
i don't know how many times ProdigalJunkMail May 2012 #11

BiggJawn

(23,051 posts)
1. OMFG! NOT into his "Permanent Record!
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:50 AM
May 2012

Well, it's not exactly permanent if it's only for 2 years, is it...

When did a civil penalty become "legal enforcement action"? I answered my own question, after all, if they can throw you in jail for not paying your bills...

SoutherDem

(2,307 posts)
2. I haven't flown for years
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:52 AM
May 2012

long before smartphones and tablets. But, iPhones and iPads have Airplane Mode. I thought that turned off the part of the device which would harm an aircraft and would basically leave the device safe? I would have left mine out too unless I was specifically told by someone not to.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. Airplane mode is for when you're at cruising altitutde
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:50 AM
May 2012

All electronics have to be turned off for takeoff and landing. "Airplane mode" isn't good enough.

Why? Flight attendants can't tell if you modified your device to screw with the plane. And both you and the flight attendants can't tell if your device is malfunctioning and will screw with the plane.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
5. if personal electronics had the potential to screw with a plane..
Mon May 14, 2012, 12:08 PM
May 2012

they would be confiscated prior to boarding. relying on passengers to ensure their devices are powered down for the safety of the flight is a ridiculous notion.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
7. Just repeating the FAA's logic. Not endorsing it.
Mon May 14, 2012, 12:16 PM
May 2012

And yes, it would be quite possible to modify an electronic device to screw with the RF-based systems on an airplane. But since there's a piece of wetware in the cockpit it's pretty unlikely that it would cause a crash.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
9. Sounds like defective avionics...
Mon May 14, 2012, 03:46 PM
May 2012

Why can't the avionics industry try making aircraft instruments and avionics that don't freak out because of EM from a twitchy cell phone?

Hell, they should be testing their hardware with a deliberately-engineered jamming device running in the passenger cabin, to ensure that they can deal with more than just twitchy cell phones.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
12. And just who would be paying for this?
Tue May 15, 2012, 02:06 AM
May 2012

The airlines won't. They can get by with the current boxes. Keep in mind one of the things that could get interferred with are external navigation & communication signals (VHF, VOR, ILS, GPS).

Response to backscatter712 (Reply #9)

Gold Metal Flake

(13,805 posts)
10. "...after which, the record will be expunged."
Mon May 14, 2012, 03:53 PM
May 2012

Yeah. Um, Mr. Cardone should probably follow up on that to make sure.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
11. i don't know how many times
Mon May 14, 2012, 04:38 PM
May 2012

in the last few years that i have heard a phone on a plane ring while on approach...even from the luggage compartments. which simply means, the thing has been on the whole damned flight...so all the warnings about phones and iPad and Blackberries and the like fucking with the systems on the aircraft...yeah, bullshit.

if there was any danger at ALL they would not let people carry them on the plane. you simply can't rely on a passenger to turn it off. imagine how easy it would be for a terrorist to down a plane if there were any danger...

sP

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FAA warns man who took vi...