HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » If Rachel Dolezal wants t...

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:10 PM

If Rachel Dolezal wants to embrace black culture...

...and borrow from it as a way to define herself, I don't understand what the problem is. People have been "passing" as one race over another for eons.

Consider the 70s "Crying Indian Chief" commercial with the tearful "Native American" guy who turned out to be Italian. He claimed to be of Cherokee-Cree descent and maintained the illusion throughout his adult life.

Carol Channing passed as white so as not to hurt her career as an actress. She finally outed herself when she was 81 by admitting that her father had been half black.

What about Michael Jackson? He tried desperately to convince the world (and himself) that he had white skin. Mariah Carey pushed her multiracial ethnicity early in her carrier. So did Tiger Woods. People appear to fashion identities that make them feel comfortable in their own skin.

Rachel Dolezal has been immersed in black culture for most of her life. She had African American siblings by way of adoption and she was, at one time, married to a black man. She also, apparently, parented at least one of her black siblings for a time.

The "one drop" rule and the fact that we all share a common African ancestry should buttress her right to explore African culture if she so chooses, but I think it goes deeper than that. She has attempted to walk the walk while consistently advocating on behalf of the African American community. Everything that Rachel Dolezal has stood for and worked for in her adult life, has been in the interest of defending and honoring black culture.

Berating someone because of their skin color, in this day and age, seems backward and counterintuitive. People are willing to attack her for attempting to wear a 'black' hairstyle but say nothing when Beyonce wears a straight blonde wig. They both should be able to wear their hair in any style that makes them happy.

As an actual multiracial person, by way of her Czech, Swedish, German and Native American roots, she should be allowed to self-identify in any way she chooses. How she rolls is no threat to anyone else's blackness or whiteness. She genuinely appreciates and loves African American people and black culture. She's worked tirelessly for racial equality, civil rights and an end to racism and police brutality.

The NAACP supports her multiracial identity and so do I.



TYY

246 replies, 18092 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 246 replies Author Time Post
Reply If Rachel Dolezal wants to embrace black culture... (Original post)
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 OP
1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #1
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #3
1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #52
Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #73
1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #77
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #91
1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #118
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #135
1StrongBlackMan Jun 2015 #137
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #141
tblue37 Jun 2015 #173
DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #26
cwydro Jun 2015 #2
LisaL Jun 2015 #6
cwydro Jun 2015 #8
KittyWampus Jun 2015 #45
marshall Jun 2015 #68
LisaL Jun 2015 #4
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #5
LisaL Jun 2015 #7
tammywammy Jun 2015 #9
LisaL Jun 2015 #10
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #11
LisaL Jun 2015 #14
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #16
politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2015 #44
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #59
get the red out Jun 2015 #126
Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #241
GGJohn Jun 2015 #242
get the red out Jun 2015 #244
tammywammy Jun 2015 #15
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #17
GGJohn Jun 2015 #18
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #19
GGJohn Jun 2015 #20
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #21
840high Jun 2015 #144
kcr Jun 2015 #81
tammywammy Jun 2015 #82
kcr Jun 2015 #84
laundry_queen Jun 2015 #210
gollygee Jun 2015 #216
GGJohn Jun 2015 #86
kcr Jun 2015 #88
gollygee Jun 2015 #90
kcr Jun 2015 #92
GGJohn Jun 2015 #93
kcr Jun 2015 #96
GGJohn Jun 2015 #99
kcr Jun 2015 #101
GGJohn Jun 2015 #107
kcr Jun 2015 #115
tammywammy Jun 2015 #120
kcr Jun 2015 #123
GGJohn Jun 2015 #121
kcr Jun 2015 #124
GGJohn Jun 2015 #125
kcr Jun 2015 #129
GGJohn Jun 2015 #130
GGJohn Jun 2015 #175
kcr Jun 2015 #177
GGJohn Jun 2015 #178
kcr Jun 2015 #179
GGJohn Jun 2015 #180
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #106
kcr Jun 2015 #111
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #224
GGJohn Jun 2015 #94
kcr Jun 2015 #97
GGJohn Jun 2015 #100
kcr Jun 2015 #102
GGJohn Jun 2015 #103
kcr Jun 2015 #104
840high Jun 2015 #151
kcr Jun 2015 #154
LisaL Jun 2015 #181
kcr Jun 2015 #184
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #186
GGJohn Jun 2015 #187
kcr Jun 2015 #188
GGJohn Jun 2015 #191
kcr Jun 2015 #192
GGJohn Jun 2015 #195
kcr Jun 2015 #200
GGJohn Jun 2015 #202
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #190
GGJohn Jun 2015 #193
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #203
GGJohn Jun 2015 #205
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #207
LisaL Jun 2015 #182
kcr Jun 2015 #185
840high Jun 2015 #146
dballance Jun 2015 #85
GGJohn Jun 2015 #12
Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #22
tymorial Jun 2015 #56
Drunken Irishman Jun 2015 #114
840high Jun 2015 #148
Post removed Jun 2015 #13
gollygee Jun 2015 #24
marshall Jun 2015 #72
gollygee Jun 2015 #78
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #98
LittleBlue Jun 2015 #27
XemaSab Jun 2015 #55
stevenleser Jun 2015 #170
WinkyDink Jun 2015 #37
Skittles Jun 2015 #63
Matariki Jun 2015 #23
bravenak Jun 2015 #25
Exultant Democracy Jun 2015 #28
bravenak Jun 2015 #29
Exultant Democracy Jun 2015 #30
bravenak Jun 2015 #31
XemaSab Jun 2015 #70
bravenak Jun 2015 #71
XemaSab Jun 2015 #58
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #161
WinkyDink Jun 2015 #38
ann--- Jun 2015 #110
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #32
bravenak Jun 2015 #34
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #39
bravenak Jun 2015 #41
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #46
bravenak Jun 2015 #49
Spazito Jun 2015 #42
bravenak Jun 2015 #43
Spazito Jun 2015 #48
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #47
Spazito Jun 2015 #50
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #51
gollygee Jun 2015 #53
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #57
gollygee Jun 2015 #60
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #67
gollygee Jun 2015 #79
GGJohn Jun 2015 #61
bravenak Jun 2015 #62
tammywammy Jun 2015 #89
bravenak Jun 2015 #95
tammywammy Jun 2015 #112
bravenak Jun 2015 #116
Spazito Jun 2015 #64
GGJohn Jun 2015 #65
Spazito Jun 2015 #66
suffragette Jun 2015 #155
Spazito Jun 2015 #157
Number23 Jun 2015 #75
MADem Jun 2015 #159
countryjake Jun 2015 #35
Number23 Jun 2015 #76
countryjake Jun 2015 #165
kcr Jun 2015 #117
tammywammy Jun 2015 #122
kcr Jun 2015 #127
tammywammy Jun 2015 #128
kcr Jun 2015 #131
GGJohn Jun 2015 #138
kcr Jun 2015 #143
GGJohn Jun 2015 #147
kcr Jun 2015 #149
countryjake Jun 2015 #133
kcr Jun 2015 #136
countryjake Jun 2015 #139
kcr Jun 2015 #142
840high Jun 2015 #150
JI7 Jun 2015 #33
WinkyDink Jun 2015 #36
WinkyDink Jun 2015 #40
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #54
FrodosPet Jun 2015 #145
ZX86 Jun 2015 #204
LisaL Jun 2015 #213
ZX86 Jun 2015 #215
gollygee Jun 2015 #218
LisaL Jun 2015 #229
romanic Jun 2015 #69
Skittles Jun 2015 #134
840high Jun 2015 #152
Omnith Jun 2015 #74
Maedhros Jun 2015 #80
ann--- Jun 2015 #109
kcr Jun 2015 #83
locdlib Jun 2015 #87
Scootaloo Jun 2015 #105
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #132
ann--- Jun 2015 #108
kcr Jun 2015 #119
840high Jun 2015 #153
kcr Jun 2015 #156
840high Jun 2015 #158
ZX86 Jun 2015 #201
RandySF Jun 2015 #113
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #140
Catherine Vincent Jun 2015 #160
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #162
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #171
CTBlueboy Jun 2015 #163
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #164
LineLineLineReply .
countryjake Jun 2015 #166
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #167
CTBlueboy Jun 2015 #168
countryjake Jun 2015 #217
CTBlueboy Jun 2015 #231
akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #169
Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #172
WinkyDink Jun 2015 #174
Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #176
LisaL Jun 2015 #183
Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #240
LineLineReply .
gollygee Jun 2015 #189
countryjake Jun 2015 #196
gollygee Jun 2015 #197
countryjake Jun 2015 #198
gollygee Jun 2015 #199
fishwax Jun 2015 #209
countryjake Jun 2015 #211
fishwax Jun 2015 #212
Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #243
gollygee Jun 2015 #245
Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #246
uponit7771 Jun 2015 #194
Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #206
ZX86 Jun 2015 #208
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #214
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #219
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #220
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #221
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #223
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #225
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #226
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #227
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #228
NuclearDem Jun 2015 #230
GGJohn Jun 2015 #232
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #233
GGJohn Jun 2015 #234
gollygee Jun 2015 #222
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #235
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #236
TeeYiYi Jun 2015 #237
prayin4rain Jun 2015 #238
Puha Ekapi Jun 2015 #239

Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:13 PM

1. Do you mind my asking what your race is? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #1)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:24 PM

3. I'm white. I'm a mutt...

I'm Danish, English, Irish, Scottish and a little bit Cherokee, according to my grandmother.

When asked, I say I'm Danish.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #3)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:42 PM

52. Perhaps, this ...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #52)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:46 PM

73. Oh, great quote there

"The lesson is this: authentic antiracist white identity is what we must cultivate. We can not shed our skin, nor our privileges; we must work in conjunction with people of color to overturn the system that bestows those privileges. But the key word is WITH people of color, not AS people of color. We must be willing to do the difficult work of finding a different way to live in this skin. THIS skin. "

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gormy Cuss (Reply #73)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:05 PM

77. Yes. A powerful quote ...

 

one that is key to allyship ... "we must work in conjunction with people of color to overturn the system that bestows those privileges. But the key word is WITH people of color, ..." ... and the "with" connotes an equality, that so many liberals refuse to acknowledge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #52)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:38 PM

91. Thanks for the link…

I believe she immersed herself in black culture because she had black siblings and, at one time, a black husband. She stretched the truth so as to establish herself firmly among her network of family and friends without being ostracized.

According to the article that you linked to, Rachel Dolezal likely did what she did because she wanted to fit in. She lied because she wanted to be accepted by black people without being questioned about her motives or doing the hard work to become an ally.

My thought is this:

If being an ally to Black America is becoming more difficult than surviving Rush Week at the local sorority or fraternity… you're going to lose a lot of allies.

I'm gay and I'll take all the straight allies I can get. If they choose to lie to me about all of the "tons of amazing gay sex" they're having, while co-opting a gay hairstyle and metrosexual fashion…more power to them. I say, "Welcome, my new gay compatriots."

Rachel Dolezal has been a good friend and an ally to the African American community. I find it hard to believe that she's being treated like the enemy.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #91)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:33 PM

118. I don't think she is being treated as an enemy ...

 

So much as a discovered deceiver ... and as such, as someone to be watched.

Honestly, I find it hard to believe that you would welcome someone who decever you into the leadership of LGBT causes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #118)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:14 PM

135. You make a good point...

I would prefer actual gay people to be in positions of leadership in the gay community. That said, I would not throw a straight ally under the bus for deceiving me, unless that person's intent was to do harm to me or the gay community.

I don't believe that Rachel Dolezal's intent was to do harm to the African American community.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #135)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:24 PM

137. I agree ...

 

I do not believe her intent was to do harm to the Black community ... rather, I think her intent was to speak FOR the Black community ... and she knew that she couldn't do that as a white woman.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #137)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:46 PM

141. Precisely. ..nt

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #137)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:17 AM

173. It seems that she also wanted go be in the spotlight: in a starring role, not just part of

the chorus. Her fraudulent claims about being the target of hate crimes strikes me as attention seeking of the sort found in Munchausen syndrome (not the proxy kind), in which individuals "feign disease, illness, or psychological trauma to draw attention, sympathy, or reassurance to themselves." (Yes, I know Wikipedia isn't a "proper" source, but I don't intend this as an academic citation, but only as an adequate lay definition, which it is.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #1)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:15 PM

26. IMHO, it would have been better if she said she empathizes with black folks and left it at that.

The masquerade and all the lies that were necessary to perpetuate it is what is off putting. I look forward to seeing her address it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:22 PM

2. And the false claims of hate crimes

that she made?

She has not helped anyone of any race.

She is not black, and she cannot claim to know what life is like for a black person in this country.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cwydro (Reply #2)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:34 PM

6. She made hate crime allegations pretty regularly over recent years.

Every time she makes these allegations, police have to investigate. None of the allegations resulted in any arrests or prosecutions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #6)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:35 PM

8. She's a nutcase.

Pure and simple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cwydro (Reply #8)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:10 PM

45. maybe you could consider rephrasing that, please?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cwydro (Reply #2)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:28 PM

68. I Think "unproven" would be more accurate

ive read nothing that indicates they were proven false.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:24 PM

4. I think what she is berated for are all the stories.

Such as trying to pass a black man as her bio dad, while her bio dad is a different, white man (who has been married to her bio mom for 41 years).

"And she has presented the public with a different family photograph posted to the local NAACP chapter's Facebook page. When she announced her father was coming to town for a visit, she showed herself standing next to an older African-American man."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/13/us/washington-rachel-dolezal-adopted-brother/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #4)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:33 PM

5. Who did she hurt...

...by doing that? She obviously doesn't get along with her real parents and who can blame her. What they've done to her is despicable. I'd disown them too.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:35 PM

7. Well, you can't disown somebody else's parents.

If you want to disown your own, go right ahead.
What exactly did her parents do to her, except set the record straight? Should they have lied to cover up for her stories?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:38 PM

9. What have they done to her, other than admit they're her parents? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #9)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:39 PM

10. Exactly.

Her dad is the bio dad. He had been married to her bio mom for 41 years (years before she was born). She claimed in her stories he was a step dad.
How would that be possible, unless she is implying her mother cheated on him?
Should the parents have gone along with her claims?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #9)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:42 PM

11. I think they're leading the charge...

...in trying to publicly tear her down. And, they're succeeding.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #11)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:45 PM

14. In their defense, they are not the ones who started it.

She did, by claiming some other guy was her real father.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #14)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:49 PM

16. It's hard to say...

...who started it or how the media suddenly became so interested in Rachel Dolezal. Their family is in the middle of a lawsuit that's apparently just now coming to a head.

Rachel Dolezal dismisses the controversy as little more than an ugly byproduct of contentious litigation between other family members over allegations of past abuse that has divided the family. She’s particularly suspicious of the timing, noting that the allegations broke on her son’s birthday and come as the Colorado lawsuit filed by her sister against their brother nears a key juncture.
Read more at http://m.snopes.com/2015/06/12/rachel-dolezal/#71xkFoebwY2rDToh.99

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #14)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:07 PM

44. Well as her parents they didn't owe anyone any explanation.

Even if I was estranged from my adult children, (which I am not and I have three of them) I would not feel I owe any members of the press who came around asking me questions about my child, any kind of explanation. It seems that the parents outed her to the press. What could they have hoped to gain from doing so, and why did they feel they needed to. Family problems aired in public never won over anyone to the other's side. As the parent, if they thought their daughter had 'issues' why air her 'issues' to the public. Instead take the high ground, and allow your child some breathing room and hope that she would come around. Only in White America, could your child pretending to be black be the worse thing in the world to happen to you and her. Let's see: Pregnant and unwed? No. High School dropout? No. Drug addict? No. Unemployed and Homeless? No. No., Career Criminal? No. Pretending to be black when she's white? OH MY GOD??????

These parent were supposed to me members of a religious organization. Served as missionairies for the church? Where is their sense of compassion, forgiveness, privacy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #44)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:06 PM

59. Exactly. Thank you. ..nt

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #44)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:57 PM

126. Yes

Just my opinion but these "parents" just wanted to destroy her. Shows me that the issues this lady may have that drove her need to create a new identity for herself may have been caused by having hateful assholes as parents. I have thought they were mean from the start of this. I am not excusing someone creating a life of lies, but having shitty parents doesn't help one's decision making skills.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to get the red out (Reply #126)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:27 AM

241. Spot on!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to get the red out (Reply #126)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:38 AM

242. You don't know that they're shitty parents,

you're going on her word for this, and given her track record for lying, I don't for one second believe anything coming out of her mouth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #242)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 11:58 AM

244. Read the signs

They aren't saints just because people hate their daughter, they outed their own daughter, for some reason her adopted brothers came to live with her, and they are complete fundamentalists. That doesn't add up to a fun household.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #11)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:47 PM

15. From what I read the media contacted them

Should they have lied?

Ruthanne Dolezal, however, said while the family has long been aware of some of their daughter’s racial and ethnic claims in the Inland Northwest, they didn’t comment until being contacted by the media.

Ruthanne Dolezal said the family’s ancestry is Czech, Swedish and German. She said the family does have some “faint traces” of Native American heritage as well. She provided a copy of her daughter’s Montana birth certificate listing herself and Larry Dolezal as Rachel’s parents.

http://m.spokesman.com/stories/2015/jun/11/board-member-had-longstanding-doubts-about-truthfu/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #15)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:53 PM

17. The media...

...may have contacted them about the pending lawsuit. I don't think they should have used it as an opportunity to tear down their daughter. It seems like they may be trying to shift the focus away from themselves.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #17)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:57 PM

18. Shift what focus away from themselves?

Maybe they're trying to clear their name of some of the ugly lies she's told over the years?
She's the liar and I cannot fathom why you're trying to excuse her lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #18)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:00 PM

19. The focus of the lawsuit.

I'm defending her because I'm not comfortable with the social media internet pile on.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #19)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:04 PM

20. How do we know the lawsuit is truthful?

She's lied about everything else, why not this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #20)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:15 PM

21. I guess that remains to be seen...

I imagine it will all come out now, if and when they go to trial.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #17)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:00 PM

144. They did not tear

 

her down. They just stated facts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #15)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:25 PM

81. Is there a law that one has to speak to the media when contacted by them?

No way I would have done what they did under these circumstances. I can't imagine my own parents doing that to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #81)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:27 PM

82. I think if I was lying about who my father is, my parents would certainly set the record straight

If asked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #82)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:28 PM

84. Nope. I might contact my child and tell them to knock it off.

But a parent who would do this makes me think something is off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #84)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:04 PM

210. I agree

but then those of us with a certain type of dysfunctional family can usually smell this kind of thing a mile away.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #84)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:51 PM

216. I do agree with you about that

If I felt like people were being hurt or taken advantage of or that something were just plain wrong (as I feel was the case here) I would privately contact those people, but I can't imagine talking to the press. If she has issues with emotional stability, I shudder to think where this is taking her. What parent puts their own kid in that place, even if their kid is wrong?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #82)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:30 PM

86. And lying about having to hunt her own food with a bow and arrow,

or lying about being whipped like a slave by a baboon whip, or lying about living in S. Africa.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #86)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:33 PM

88. Wow, those sure had to be set straight! Boy, better make sure to talk to the media!

More important to do that then stand by your own daughter and make sure she gets any help she needs!

I stand by everything I say. Something is not right about her parents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #88)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:36 PM

90. I have to agree that it sounds like there is serious dysfunction there

and it probably contributed to what she did, maybe to a great extent.

Some of what she said, if it's an all-out lie, could be slander. However, it isn't necessarily all 100% a lie. There might have been some abuse in her family. The situation is weird enough that it seems like something could have been going on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #90)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:38 PM

92. Whatever was going on honestly I feel is nobody's business

And if the NACCP is okay with her, I really don't understand why anyone else should have a problem with her. And there were no problems till this media stunt with her parents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #92)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:46 PM

93. I doubt the NAACP is ok with this,

they postponed the meeting, they're probably working out the details of her resignation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to kcr (Reply #96)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:59 PM

99. I know what their press release said,

that was then, this is now, I can imagine that they're working out the terms of her separation package and resignation.

What? Did you think they would say something else?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #99)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:00 PM

101. What do you think possibly changed in two days?

Do you think they suddenly empathize with the parents who wanted to set the record straight that they're white? I highly doubt it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #101)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:10 PM

107. Well, let's see,

the police have suspended their investigation of her claims of hate mail in the NAACP mail box, she's now under investigation by the city for her role in the police oversight board she was on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #107)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:24 PM

115. It would be nice if you linked to some of the things you're claiming n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #115)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:43 PM

120. links


The City of Spokane announced Thursday it's investigating whether the president of the Spokane chapter of the NAACP violated the city's code of ethics in her application to serve on the citizen police ombudsman commission.

http://www.kxly.com/news/spokane-news/did-naacp-president-lie-about-her-race-city-investigates/33533026


Spokane police said Friday they were suspending “all cases involving Ms. (Rachel) Dolezal” after Dolezal’s parents said in a media campaign that she’s white and has been lying about being black for years.

Dolezal has filed racial harassment complaints and claimed earlier this year to have received hate mail at her office. Police said Friday they were “dropping all cases” involving Dolezal.

http://m.wpxi.com/news/news/national/police-stop-investigating-rachel-dolezals-harassme/nmcLD/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #120)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:47 PM

123. Note in the link that the NAACP states they're supporting her n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #115)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:44 PM

121. Fair enough.

Here's a link to the closing of the hate mail investigation.

http://www.khq.com/story/29309472/spokane-police-investigation-into-rachel-dolezal-hate-mail-now-closed

Here's the other link on the investigation on her behavior while on the ombudsman panel.

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2015/jun/14/spokane-officials-investigating-rachel-dolezals/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #121)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:51 PM

124. ...

The Rev. Happy Watkins, a former president of the Spokane NAACP and co-founder of Spokane’s annual Martin Luther King Jr. Day celebration, said he has no problem with Dolezal remaining the head of the local NAACP chapter.

“She became president because she ran against James Wilburn and won,” he said, referring to the branch’s former president who was defeated in an election last year. “She didn’t run on a black issue or a white issue.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #124)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:55 PM

125. We'll see,

but I'll be willing to bet that they postponed the meeting to work out the details of her resignation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #125)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:03 PM

129. Well won't you just be thrilled, then!

And I'm sure her parents will be happy, too. She'll be back where she belongs. Everyone, back where they belong, just as it should be. The groups behind this will be glad it all worked out the way it should as well, if things I've heard are true. That area is crawling with white supremacists.

What a fucking shame.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #129)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:04 PM

130. Maybe, just maybe she wouldn't be in this mess if she wasn't a serial liar.


She's responsible for the mess she's in, not her parents, her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #124)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:16 PM

175. So, I was right

Rachel Dolezal resigns as leader from NAACP's Spokane chapter

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #175)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:30 PM

177. Yay, you. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #177)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:32 PM

178. I hope she gets the help she needs and finds peace in her life. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #178)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:33 PM

179. I'm sure you do. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #179)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:34 PM

180. Believe it or not, I truly do. eom.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #96)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:09 PM

106. Thank you for the link...

They see through the bullshit and I hope they stick to their guns. I imagine they're receiving a groundswell of pressure from the torch and pitchfork wielding Twitterverse to fire Rachel Donezal.

I hope they stay focused and continue to do the right thing; seek the truth and refuse to be influenced by internet hysteria.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #106)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:18 PM

111. I hope so

Obviously if there's been fraud it isn't good, but all I've seen so far is typical manufactured outrage based on internet fluff. All the claims of lies aren't based on anything substantial. My personal observation has been that those howling about this the loudest are white people. It's almost as if they empathize with the parents. Well of course they're white. They surely had to set THAT straight! Who wouldn't do that? She had to be brought back to the fold. You can't pretend to be who you aren't, it isn't natural! Also of course there are posts, especially on DU, about cultural appropriation and accusations of black face. I get that, of course. I'm not denying those aren't issues.

But we don't know what claims of lies are based in fact. Her family history is obviously rocky. And the NAACP seemed to know about it and was okay with it. That and the fact that I believe you should take a person's word for it when they claim their identity, always because it's the right thing and the polite thing to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #90)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:15 PM

224. I agree with you...

If Rachel Dolezal's parents had proclaimed that they had NEVER lived in a teepee in their entire lives, then I might be willing to accept their version of things as the complete and unvarnished truth. As it is, they have admitted that they DID live in a teepee in 1974; three years before Rachel was born.

Who's to say that Rachel wasn't raised on stories of teepees and bows and arrows... I think this family puts the 'fun' in dys'fun'ctional and it's anybody's guess how they brainwashed their children.

I don't think that Rachel Dolezal made these stories up, out of whole cloth. I think she had help.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #88)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:47 PM

94. Wow!!!

You blame her parents for her serial lying?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #94)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:57 PM

97. Wow!! Way to interpret a post, there!

Not sure how you read it that way, but okay!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #97)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:00 PM

100. You said there was something wrong with the parents, yet you didn't say squat

about her serial lying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #100)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:01 PM

102. Yes. I think there is something wrong with parents who would go to the media

about a child who is a serial liar. I certainly do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #102)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:05 PM

103. They didn't go to the media,

the media came to them and maybe they'd had enough of her lies and wanted to set the record straight in the hopes that she would get the psychiatric help she desperately needs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #103)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:06 PM

104. It doesn't matter. They talked.

As I said before, there's no law saying you have to talk to the media and they did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #104)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:10 PM

151. So what? They did not lie. She did.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 840high (Reply #151)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:18 PM

154. There's just no possiblity that they're lying? That just can't be the case?



Do all fundy parents who adopt their children from abroad abuse them? No, but enough of them do that when a child in that arrangement makes the claim? I'm going to think it's highly likely the claim is valid. These are parents who are talking to the media and are all too happy to throw their daughter to the media wolves. I believe they abused their daughter. Do I think Rachel Dolezal is telling lies? Of course, but as I've said. The NAACP supported her and that was enough for me, and I furvently hope they still will, and don't let the media digging up these asshole parents of hers derail her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #154)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:35 PM

181. They told media they are her bio parents. Which they are.

So what are you talking about? What are you suggesting they lied about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #181)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:49 PM

184. I'm more than suggesting that they didn't have to take their issues public.

If they had a problem with what their daughter was doing, they could have gone directly to the NAACP. Any parent who would subject their daughter to what she is going through now is no one anyone should take seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #184)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:59 PM

186. You're absolutely correct...

The parents are behind this tawdy media crucifixion and I hope they're proud of themselves. Ultimately, I think they're going to live to regret their decision to throw their daughter to the wolves; which is exactly what internet social media is... a pack of angry wolves with blood in the air. Blood, and a sense of humor!

I don't think they realize that by outing their daughter, they've effectively outed themselves... I hope they're ready to reap what they've sown. There's not a closet big enough to contain the skeletons that I suspect are about to come tumbling out of their closets!

TYY



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #186)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:03 PM

187. Just amazing!!!

You're blaming the parents for the mess Rachael is in rather than Rachael and her serial lying?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #187)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:12 PM

188. Yes!!

Why is this a huge media storm? Because of her parents.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #188)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:31 PM

191. So, Rachael has no responsibility for the mess she's in?

It's all her parent's fault?
Her lying has nothing to do with it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #191)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:32 PM

192. Yes, it's all her parent's fault

Does the media and the public know all about every mistake you've made?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #192)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:37 PM

195. Why would they?

I'm not a serial liar in a position of leadership.

So, you're telling me that her lying about numerous life experiences have nothing to do with the mess she's in?
Fucking amazing!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #195)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:57 PM

200. I'm saying she wouldn't be splashed all over the media if it weren't for her parents.

What is so hard about this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #200)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:05 PM

202. And I'm saying that if not for her lying about her life experiences,

including lies about her parents, then there would have been nothing for the media to pursue.
What is so hard about this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #187)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:26 PM

190. I think her parents...

...are involved in familial litigation that's warped their sense of what's right and wrong. Now that the family lawsuit is about to go to trial, they're taking the low road while posturing themselves as having taken the high road. In other words, they're sadistically relishing in their 15 minutes of fame.

They may have bitten off more than they are willing to chew, by throwing their daughter under the bus. They've been estranged from her for quite a few years and have chosen this moment in time to 'honestly answer the media's queries' as though they didn't have a choice. I hope they're ready for the media shitstorm that they've unleashed. In my opinion, it couldn't happen to a nicer couple.

The internet and social media is unrelenting and I think the parents are about to find that out... the hard way.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #190)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:34 PM

193. And you know all this how?

Are you personally involved with the family? Or is this pure speculation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #193)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:15 PM

203. It's pure speculation…

…based on watching the parents as they wend their way through the mainstream television news circuit; ignorant to the reality of what's really happening to them.

The Rachel Dolezal story has officially jumped the shark at this point, and there's no such thing as enough bandages to stanch the bleeding from this media and internet feeding frenzy…

I'm not talking about a bored cat, batting around a lizard… This is angry piranhas, latched onto an open wound.
The only thing left to do, now, is sit back and watch…

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #203)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:18 PM

205. Do you think there would be this media circus if she hadn't been telling

blatant lies
Do you think she's in any way responsible for this media circus?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #205)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:39 PM

207. She made her own bed...

...but no, I do not think there would have been this media circus, if not for the actions of her parents.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #104)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:36 PM

182. There is no law that says you can't talk to the media either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #182)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:50 PM

185. Huh?

Is the media not aware that there are people who think parents who would do this to their children are scum?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #82)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:01 PM

146. So would mine.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #11)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:30 PM

85. Her parents didn't lie about her being whipped like a slave.

 

Her parents didn't lie about her being born in a teepee.
Her parents didn't lie about her brother being her son.
Her parents didn't lie and tell people her biological father was her step father.

She has told so many lies. Many of which reflect negatively on her parents.

I think her parents have every right to defend themselves.

She could easily embrace black culture without all the blatant lies she's told.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:42 PM

12. And what have they done to her that was so despicable?

They've kept quiet all these years in the face of her lies, lies like telling people that her adopted brother was really her son, lies like her father used to whip her like a slave with a baboon whip, lies like her receiving mail in the NAACP mail box?
Why anyone would defend this liar is beyond me.
She's a liar, and her real parents had had enough of her lies and went public.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:46 PM

22. You would disown your parents if said you were white?

 

She is white.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:01 PM

56. Telling the truth is such a horrible thing

Your comment is insane.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:23 PM

114. LOL what dumb logic. By your logic, cheating is perfectly okay because who does it hurt?

If you cheat your way through school you're really not hurting anyone, right? So, what's the big deal?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #5)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:02 PM

148. They said she is white - which she is.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)


Response to Post removed (Reply #13)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:03 PM

24. Caitlyn Jenner *is* a woman

"Bruce Jenner" did not decide to be a woman. There are biological factors to being transgender. Caitlyn was unable to express her true gender until recently, but she did not just *become* a woman. And because there are biological factors involved in being transgender, it is not the same as race, which is not a biological thing. It is a societal construct forced upon us externally. Because it is given to us, whether we like it or not, externally by society, we can't just change it.

Do a thought experiment here. Can an African American with dark skin decide to change his or her race? No, because society won't let him or her. It isn't a choice or people could simply choose to stop being discriminated against. Obviously discrimination happens whether they want it or not, so it isn't a choice or something you can change.

People can't just decide to change their gender or race. That isn't what happened with Caitlyn Jenner, she didn't *change* her gender - she only changed her gender expression and made it more authentic to who she is - and I'm tired of hearing people say, "If Bruce Jenner can become a woman. . . "

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #24)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:39 PM

72. The way gender is expressed is also a social construct

there is nothing biological about makeup, curled hair, corsets, and high heels--all of which Caitlyn utilized to express her gender.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marshall (Reply #72)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:12 PM

78. How people express their gender is

but their gender is not. I don't dress in a feminine way, but that does not change my gender. My gender is biological. Transgender people's genders also have a biological component.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marshall (Reply #72)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:59 PM

98. ...and, all of which...

...Rachel Dolezal used to express her self-perceived cultural identity. She wanted to be black so she emulated black culture. How is that now possibly being convoluted into being a bad thing?

Good post, marshall.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Post removed (Reply #13)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:25 PM

27. I think Title IX will be greatly impacted

 

A trans woman MMA fighter recently fought a cis woman. She fractured the cis woman's orbital bone in her eye. The cis woman claimed that when in the grasp of the trans woman, she couldn't move like she normally could when fighting another cis woman. According to those who watched, the fight was a one-sided massacre.

Most trans women don't seem to participate in competitive sports. But as trans people become more and more accepted and welcomed into sports, it's a question without an answer. Even though I support trans people 100%, that doesn't mean we can't discuss issues like these.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LittleBlue (Reply #27)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:50 PM

55. That seems like a discussion for transpeople to have

No matter how much like a woman you feel, in many cases you still have male musculature. It's like someone with dyslexia competing in the Special Olympics: yeah, you can kick everyone's ass, but are you still going to feel good about yourself?

That being said, I don't want to be the gatekeeper for who gets to compete.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LittleBlue (Reply #27)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 05:45 AM

170. That is actually an old discussion. Google Renee Richards. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Post removed (Reply #13)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:36 PM

37. Completely false analogy. Jenner has medical studies and numbers. RD has....herself and lies.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Post removed (Reply #13)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:09 PM

63. are you really as stupid as "The Right"?

I mean, SERIOUSLY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:52 PM

23. Well, if anything it points to interesting things about perception

and also points to the glee people have in public humiliations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:10 PM

25. She is not black. The problem people have is that she told a whole bunch of lies.

 

Only white people have the luxury to play pretend at being black. Black people have to be mostly white to pass, like being a octaroon or a quadroon, basically white folks with a few drops of black blood. It's insulting that white folks are now telling us we have to let white ladies be black if they want to be a part of our culture. I guess we don't get to decide for ourselves whether to accept that.

Tiger Woods, King of Pop, and Mariah Carey were NEVER accepted as white. Never! But a white lady wants to play black and go around in wigs and spray tan, and black folks are admonished by white people to accept her. No. She needs help, not a bunch of folks going along with her bullshit. I have never seen white folks this defensive about a black woman before; but for a white woman playing a black woman? Oh, yeah...

We have enough of our identity and culture and history stolen from us. No she cannot be black.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #25)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:36 PM

28. What about the 25% of 'white' american's who ancestors

were black when they left the plantation and white when they got where they were going. Should any of them be allowed to be black?

Saying only white people have the luxury to play black then qualifying it with unless they are light skinned kind of leave a giant population of 'black' people in the mushy middle that you seem to dismiss in an offhanded way. If a light skinned black who could pass at black, shaved their 'white' hair and spend a lot of time in the sun would they also be guilty of playing black, or playing blacker at least?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #28)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:39 PM

29. If they have always identified as black, and their parents have always identified, sure.

 

But having 5 percent black blood does not make you black.
A light skinned black (like my husband) is BLACK. Even if they have blond hair and blue eyes...


But if you are talking about darkening the skin for a minstrel show, it's wrong...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #29)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:55 PM

30. Are you saying if your ancestors passed into whiteness its a one way trip?

What if your parents decided to hide your racial identity from you so you thought you were white but found out that you had a secret black parent. Is there a grace period in reclaiming a hidden racial identity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #30)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:04 PM

31. If they passed into whiteness as they left the plantation, their descendants are white.

 

Everyone on earth has some african blood. Remember that KKK fool who found out he was like 6 percent african? He was not black. At all.
You can speak about your heritage, but not as a way to play pretend. I have about 1/4 native american blood and 1/4 white (scots irish) and the rest black... I do not go around saying that i'm a member of the cherokee nation or that I'm as Irish as they come. Why not? Because as a black person, I cannot do that. The Cherokee nation did not accept me into the tribe, I'm a black looking woman so no, the Irish are probably not going to rush to claim me. I am black. I don't see white folks running to accept me into whiteness, and I'm much whiter than that woman is black.

People can claim their little 5 percent black blood if they want to, just don't go around giving speeches about how their hair is a four out of five on the nappiness scale, lying and shit. Keep it real.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #31)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:33 PM

70. As a response both to your post and to my post following yours

One of the things I'm finding so fascinating about this story is the discussions of ethnic authenticity, and which parts of one's ethnicity it's okay to go all in with and which parts get left out.

I'm 1/4 Scots-Irish, and as a white person, I can be as Celtic as I want. I have a Scots-Irish last name, and I can "pass" as full-blooded with ease. Never mind the fact that it's only part of my heritage and that my dark McFro (three out of five on the nappiness scale!) is actually from the Swedish side, it's still something I can go all out with. I can be 110% Celtic and nobody's going to blink.

You've got an equal claim to that heritage, but according to the way race is constructed and defined in America today, your African blood somehow makes you not "authentically" Irish.....?

The idea that part of your heritage is somehow cancelled out by another part is so ridiculous. (I'm not saying you're ridiculous, I'm saying the "rules" are.)

I don't have to pick between my various Euromutt ethnicities. I can be Swedish, Scots-Irish, and German ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

White privilege, yo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #70)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:35 PM

71. Boom!

 

You said it! The rules are bizzarre as hell...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #30)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:06 PM

58. Reclaiming a hidden racial identity?

Blackness is an experience, not just an ancestry. If she grew up as a white person with white parents and white grandparents in a society that prizes whiteness, what kind of black experience has she really had?

By way of comparison, I'm half Swedish. My grandma, who passed last year, grew up in a household that was 100% ethnically Swedish, and her baptismal certificate is in Swedish. Her father and her maternal grandparents were from Sweden.

But am I really SWEDISH? Not at all. I don't speak a word of Swedish, I don't cook Swedish food, I don't celebrate any Swedish holidays, and I don't follow any Swedish traditions. My family are all lapsed Lutherans, and that's really about it. Even our Scandinavian genetics are more of a quirk than a heritage.

If I went in search of my "authentic" Swedish roots, I would be as much a tourist as the next person. It wouldn't be something handed down to me, it would be something I invented for myself. That cultural connection is gone.

If she's got an undiscovered black great-grandparent (or whatever), does that make her blackness authentic? Or would it be a return to the one drop rule, where any trace of African blood in a person who is culturally 100% white makes that person irredeemably BLACK?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to XemaSab (Reply #58)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:23 PM

161. Excellent post, XemaSab...

I don't speak Danish and I've never actually been to Denmark. Yet, to all who would inquire, I am Danish! It's just the major part of my ancestry that I can relate to, but don't ask me what they eat or how they dress... Truth be told, I'm Heinz 57 American: Danish, English, Irish, Scottish and a magical drop of Cherokee.

Race and culture are things I've never had a strong grasp of. I grew up in a Mormon society but I'm not a Mormon. I went to all white schools where cultural background was just not that obvious or important. I remember one student who always showed up on St. Patrick's Day with her Irish pride and a green shamrock pinned to her lapel... What a maroon!

"...as much a tourist as the next person." That's me!

Black people... Native American people... Brown people of every hue, have cultural history that white people envy. I'm one of those white people that have no cultural background to speak of or to celebrate... If you were to ask me what it's like to be Danish, our conversation would come to a screeching halt.

Rachel Dolezal grew up around African American culture and she learned to love and appreciate it, and to adopt it as her own. More power to her for celebrating the cultural diversity that she grew up around, and her decision to support and become closer to her African American siblings.

Her entire resume supports her commitment to black culture and the background that she grew up around, as a result of choices that her parents made. Embracing black culture, especially when your adopted siblings are African American, would seem the obvious and admirable thing to do.

Attacking Rachel Dolezal for embracing black culture, as a member of a mixed race family, seems cruel to say the least. I hope she's able to rise above this onslaught of internet cruelty and continue to advocate on behalf of people of color everywhere.

This attack on her has been heartless and beyond belief. Who, in their right mind, would possibly support the online bullying that Rachel Dolezal is now being subjected to? I can't imagine it.

My hope is that the black community, in her city and at large, will reassess the situation and come to her defense like she has done for them for so long.

TYY



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #28)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:38 PM

38. Having DNA vs. being a fabulist, and you see no distinction? Caitlyn isn't just Milton Berle in drag

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Exultant Democracy (Reply #28)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:17 PM

110. There's a difference between

 

"black ancestry" (we are ALL born "out of Africa" and
the race of her biological parents and THEIR ancestry - which is white.

Have adopted brothers who were black does not make this disturbed
woman black.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #25)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:05 PM

32. Her saying she is black...

...isn't ever going to make me think of her as black, any more than seeing Beyonce in a blonde wig would make me think of her as white. In both cases, I consider their appearance to be an outward expression of how they see themselves, that they've chosen. Each has borrowed from the other one's culture.

I sincerely don't understand why you're so angry at her. She clearly never meant to harm the African American community by embracing black culture and she wasn't pretending when she took up the battle for civil rights and racial equality. Her work to end racism and police brutality wasn't a ruse.

How, specifically, has Rachel Dolezal harmed you, bravenak? If you truly believe that she's harmed you personally, do you then just disregard her past work with the NAACP and any good that she's tried to do on behalf of people of color?

I don't deny that she's a little unhinged but the social media pile-on is ridiculous. I look forward to hearing her explanation tomorrow. Hopefully things will begin to make more sense.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #32)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:11 PM

34. I'm not actually angry.

 

I am a bit peeved that when a white woman wants to play black, black folks are admonished to accept that. We don't get to play white, we have to actually BE mostly white for that. She can put on some spray tan, tell a bunch of lies, throw on a nappy wig, and boom, she's black. It's a privilege that only white folks have.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:40 PM

39. Black people...

...play white all the time by wearing straight-haired wigs; and white people play black by bathing themselves in fake tan, in an attempt to appear naturally exotic when in fact, they are extremely melanin challenged.

I got to be who I am by way of my European ancestors. Sounds like you had a few of those yourself. Doesn't mean I don't wish I had skin more like yours. I would defend your right to throw on a red wig and dress in a kilt if you suddenly decided to embrace your 1/4 Irish/Scot heritage.

We all seem to be multiracial. Getting angry at someone else for how they choose to present themselves outwardly seems like a huge waste of energy. Cultural diversity should be celebrated. We're all just people underneath, with different packaging...like presents under a Christmas tree.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #39)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:51 PM

41. You think straightening our hair is playing white?

 

It's not just straightening our hair to fit in with the dominant culture? It's not playing white, it's assimilation. Some black folks were born with straight hair, like my husband and my grandmother. And my nephew, he's blond with green eyes. We all refer to ourselves as black. She did not simply wear ethnic hair styles, she lied. She did not tan just to look a certain way, she did it as a part of the deception.
This woman needs professional help, not people feeding into her nonsense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #41)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:11 PM

46. You make a good point...

...about assimilation. I think it works both ways.

The 'playing white' 'playing black' comments were a riff on something you said: re: "when a white woman wants to play black..."

Look, bravenak, I'm not going to go to the mat trying to defend the lies that got Rachel Dolezal where she's at today. She's clearly not wrapped too tight and I don't know her from a hole in the wall. You, on the other hand, I have respect for as a member of DU.

I hope the anger and media frenzy surrounding this situation dies down. In the mean time, if I've said anything to offend you, I didn't mean to and I sincerely apologize.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #46)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:17 PM

49. Ok, cool, we're good.

 

I also hope the frenzy dies down soon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #39)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:55 PM

42. Wow...

"Black people...


...play white all the time by wearing straight-haired wigs; and white people play black by bathing themselves in fake tan, in an attempt to appear naturally exotic when in fact, they are extremely melanin challenged. "

There is so much that is wrong and appalling in this post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #42)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:59 PM

43. I took several deep breaths reading it.

 

Very disappointing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #43)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:16 PM

48. I read it more than once because I couldn't believe what I was reading...

my disgust increased with each reading.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #42)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:14 PM

47. I was quoting bravenak...

...I guess I should have used quotation marks.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #47)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:26 PM

50. Context is everything, yours was very different, imo, than bravenak's and

the only quote was the word "play" the rest was all yours.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #50)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:36 PM

51. My point being...

...that I don't believe people are "playing white" or "playing black" just because they choose to cosmetically alter their outward appearance for the sake of perceived beauty.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #51)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:47 PM

53. She told people she was black

She said a man who wasn't her father was her father to try to convince people she was black. This isn't just wearing dreadlocks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #53)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:01 PM

57. I believe some...

...of her actions have to do with the internal strife surrounding family litigation. She's disowned her dad for some reason and maybe the 'why' of it will become apparent when the lawsuit is finally settled.

Maybe she'll touch on the lawsuit tomorrow when she goes public with her explanation for this whole, sordid debacle.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #57)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:06 PM

60. What you said . . .


that I don't believe people are "playing white" or "playing black" just because they choose to cosmetically alter their outward appearance for the sake of perceived beauty.


I'm responding to that. She didn't just cosmetically alter her outward appearance. She outright lied about it and was indeed "playing black." She told everyone she was black. She didn't just wear dreadlocks or something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #60)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:20 PM

67. People lie. I hope this...

...doesn't come as a shock to you. People lie for multitudes of reasons. I can only speculate about her reasons for lying but here's the thing... How is pretending you have African American blood in you the WORST. THING. EVER! ?

After all the good that she's done for the African American community, why is she being crucified for lying? Why are people of color throwing her under the bus for saying she's black? Just looking at her tells you that that's not likely true but why does it matter that she lied about having black dna, to the detriment of everything else she's stood for and done on behalf of black people everywhere? I don't get it...

As I said, people lie. She lied. So what?

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #67)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:15 PM

79. I was just responding to what you said

where you said she wasn't "playing at being black" but was just altering her outward appearance. So it appears you are going back on that now - you recognize that she wasn't just altering her outward appearance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #57)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:07 PM

61. Well, she ain't going public tomorrow,

she's postponed the explanation until further notice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #61)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:09 PM

62. I saw that. No big surprise there.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #62)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:35 PM

89. I don't know what to put this reply

+a million for your patience

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #89)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:54 PM

95. Aww, thanks! I try...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #95)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:21 PM

112. I wouldn't have thought people would be so vigorously defending a known liar.

It wasn't just the spray tan and wig. She led about who her father is, the police reports of racial harassment, saying she was beaten because of her skin, etc.

Besides, she could have been a very positive member of the NAACP as the white woman she is.

SMH

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #112)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:27 PM

116. Exactly. She could have done just as well as herself.

 

The elaborate ruse is the real thing that confuses me. I am kinda surprised at all the support she is getting even with all of the lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #61)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:12 PM

64. I don't think it was her decision to postpone...

"The NAACP branch in Spokane, Wash., has postponed a meeting Monday where its president, Rachel Dolezal, was expected to speak about the furor sparked after her parents said she has falsely portrayed herself as black for years while actually being white.

The chapter said Sunday on Facebook that the meeting would be rescheduled "due to the need to continue discussion with regional and national NAACP leaders."

According to KHQ-TV in Spokane, Dolezal had earlier sent a message to NAACP members saying she would address the situation at a group meeting Monday night.

The city of Spokane is investigating whether she lied about her ethnicity when she applied to be on the police board."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/naacp-postpones-rachel-dolezal-meeting-because-of-ongoing-talks-1.3113216

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #64)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:13 PM

65. They're probably negotiating the terms of her resignation. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #65)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:14 PM

66. Quite possibly n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #64)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:19 PM

155. Starting to look like it was her decision to postpone


http://gawker.com/rachel-dolezal-tries-to-delay-naacp-meeting-addressing-1711306414

Shortly after Dolezal’s announcement on Sunday, board member Lawrence Burnley wrote a response challenging her authority to delay the meeting:

I’m puzzled by your decision to arbitrarily cancel/postpone the meeting without input from the executive committee which is scheduled to meet today. The Association’s by-laws provides specific guidelines concerning monthly general/branch meetings. Article V, Section 1 states, “Regular meetings shall be held on a fix day or date each month.” That date, as agreed upon by the executive committee, is the third Monday of each month which is tomorrow. I don’t see any language in the by-laws that empowers you, or any one member, to arbitrarily cancel/postpone tomorrow’s meeting.
Burnley also objected to Dolezal attributing the announcement to “Spokane NAACP Chapter,” writing, “This is misleading as it conveys a decision has been made by ‘the chapter’ or the executive committee of the chapter which not the case.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to suffragette (Reply #155)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:36 PM

157. Hmmm...

"Burnley also objected to Dolezal attributing the announcement to “Spokane NAACP Chapter,” writing, “This is misleading as it conveys a decision has been made by ‘the chapter’ or the executive committee of the chapter which not the case.”

The lying continues.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #39)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:57 PM

75. "Black people...play white all the time by wearing straight-haired wigs"

I'm trying. I keep. I want to. I just.

Oh hell... This gif sums up my response to your post better than anything I could type in my current state.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bravenak (Reply #34)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:06 PM

159. And your POV is entirely valid. I don't accept her, myself--but I'm not gonna bury her, either.

I do feel sorry for her because I think she's got mental health issues and they're serious. I don't think what she did was "right" but I also don't think it was "normal." I have to wonder if she's suffering some kind of post-traumatic stress that causes her to act out in ways that don't make sense, or she's suffering a chemical imbalance--or both. I have to wonder if the only place she felt loved/validated was in the community, and if she didn't get much if any affection (and maybe some abuse--maybe not a bullwhip, but sexual abuse) when she was growing up.

If she were my kid, I'd be looking to try to get her some help, not going on CNN and making sure that her name will be on the 1000 Screwiest Stories of 2015~~! Her name and face are known around the world, she's going to have to get out the Miss Clairol and change her persona all up to be able to hide out for quite a while.

I just hope she doesn't kill herself. Sometimes when people's carefully crafted web of lies are pulled apart, that's what they do because they "just can't handle the truth" to grab a movie quote.

I'm not into praising her (though she did create a pretty good light-bright impression--she does have a good eye for detail) or excusing her, but I can't get all torch and pitchfork either. She's not well, she needs help. She's still young in the big arc of life, maybe she can ditch the need to lie, gather up and nurture her own self esteem, and do something worthwhile in the second act of her existence. Here's hoping, anyway.

In a weird way, just the contrast of her story and the "pool party beat down" one, happening so close together, have served to get people talking about the issues of privilege, assumption, etc. So there's one thing she did, even if it was unintentional!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #32)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:26 PM

35. The woman invented racial harassment against herself, false claims...

in an area that is literally crawling with a bunch of rabid racists, with verified actual attacks and harassment against Blacks.

You don't think that doing such a thing is damaging to the cause of raising awareness and fighting racism, setting back the work of honest activists?

Now she's able to just go on her merry way, pretend whatever she may choose to "be" next, but leaving the inland Pacific Northwest with a slew of hateful people who've been empowered by her privileged charade.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #35)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:00 PM

76. + a million. Very well said. I actually became tired after reading this OP and the responses within

Some of the things that people are saying in an effort to defend this woman's actions are simply beyond all logic and reason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #76)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:36 AM

165. Thank you.

I missed your reply, earlier. Wish I hadn't, cause it does seem rather futile.

I don't think that I want to read anymore of it now, either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #35)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:32 PM

117. You think that an area crawling with a bunch of rabid racists with verified actual attacks

that it isn't possible something happened to her? Rabid racists would certainly attack someone like Rachel Dolezal, even if they knew she was really white. Especially if they knew she was really white. I don't think she actually lied aout the attacks against her. It's why I'm not so sure all these claims of lies are really lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #117)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:46 PM

122. She claimed to receive harassing letters in the NAACP mailbox

That's only accessible with a key and the letter had no stamp or barcode (so it couldn't have been delivered by the USPS carrier). So yeah, I think she easily made it up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #122)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:59 PM

127. Yes. It was PO workers so of course they'd say it was unlikely

But if it was a PO worker doing the harassing, it would be possible. And in an area crawling with white supremacists, more likely than those PO workers giving the interview would let on. Of course they're not going to say, "Yeah, this area is pretty sketchy, anything can happen"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #127)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:03 PM

128. Since we know she's a liar, is more likely than not that she's lying here too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tammywammy (Reply #128)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:05 PM

131. Examine how we "know she's a liar"

That does matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #131)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:29 PM

138. Well, let's see,

She lied about a black man being her father, she lied about her brother being her son, she lied about having to hunt for her food as a child with a bow and arrow, she lied about living in S. Africa, and her biggest lie is her claiming she's AA when childhood pictures show quite clearly she's white.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #138)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:59 PM

143. That wasn't my question.

I didn't ask for a list of the lies. I asked how we knew she lied.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #143)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:01 PM

147. By bringing forward the real facts which I just did. eom.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #147)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:02 PM

149. Those are are the alleged lies themselves. They didn't just spring forth from the ground, did they?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #117)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:10 PM

133. Whether any of the claims she made were true doesn't matter anymore.

She was a white woman posing, working, and organizing as a Black woman and every single aryan agitator, closet klan kreep, and all of the flat-out bigoted ignoramuses now know it.

Have you even read any of the comments at local papers like The Spokesman Review or The Coeur d' Alene Press?


Credibility of local NAACP leader Rachel Dolezal questioned ~ June 11, 2015
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2015/jun/11/board-member-had-longstanding-doubts-about-truthfu/

Black like me? ~ June 11, 2015
http://cdapress.com/news/local_news/article_385adfeb-76f3-5050-98b4-d4bf021c423f.html


Or, try reading these interviews from Eastern Washington University, in her college paper and then get back to me.

A Life to be Heard ~ February 5, 2015
http://easterneronline.com/35006/eagle-life/a-life-to-be-heard/#sthash.1aUk3liU.YGqwFa2I.dpbs

Professor Interprets Racial Differences ~ February 26, 2014
http://easterneronline.com/30681/eagle-life/professor-interprets-racial-differences/#sthash.uI6p7pHQ.uA8MTD9H.dpbs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #133)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:18 PM

136. Okay. Why are you arguing with me why it matters if they're true?

You realize I'm not the one hopping up and down calling her a liar?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #136)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:34 PM

139. Come again?

I am not arguing with anyone.

The sad truth is that because of this charade, the elaborate ruse that Rachel Dolezal managed to pull off, all of the extremely hard work that activists, fighting against racism and for basic human rights, have been doing for years in the Inland Pacific Northwest is now being called into question.

Just read some of those comments at the links to the local newspapers I've given you, if you doubt the damage she's done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #139)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:58 PM

142. Who is calling it into question? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #35)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:09 PM

150. ...^ that

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:08 PM

33. She lIed about abuse and attacks

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:34 PM

36. I believe she has done more than "pass." She has FABRICATED. She has not one scintilla of Black DNA.

 

She's from Germanic stock, for God's sake, complete with blonde hair and freckles! She's got a major screw loose!

I'm English-Irish-Welsh-Sicilian-Slovak, and no tanning agent, no Jeri curl and no adopted siblings CAN MAKE ME A BLACK PERSON.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:48 PM

40. Nobody is denying her work, her passion, her goals. But the "Out of Africa" bit is a tad OTT. Plus,

 

you use some interesting examples.

Who, e.g., would deny that Michael Jackson was mentally unstable?

Who, e.g., would claim that Beyonce's wigs are her attempts to be a White woman?

Who, e.g., would deny Tiger Woods, son of an Asian mother and an A-A father, the right to declare himself either or both ethnicities?

The PROBLEM with Rachel is she is denying her parentage IN THE FACE OF REALITY AND IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE. This is the definition of, to be technical here, NUTS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:47 PM

54. There's a whole lot wrong with this OP, but to address just one particular point,

Michael Jackson had the chronic and progressive skin disease vitiligo, which makes patches of your skin lose colour. His 'whitening' was not an attempt to 'be a white person'. It was an attempt to not look like a piebald horse by matching the rest of his skin to the parts that were already losing colour on their own.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #54)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:00 PM

145. Vitiligo: A day in Lee Thomas' shoes

(Detroit TV reporter / anchor) Thomas has vitiligo, a disorder in which pigment-making cells are destroyed.

Although we can never imagine what it's like to actually be in his shoes, we can try to understand and learn what it's like for him and many others.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #54)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:17 PM

204. What about the nose jobs, and the wigs, and the public speaking voice,

and the children he chose to adopt? He's the only person in Hollywood who didn't adopt a kid from someplace in the developing world. Micheal Jackson's issues with race went far beyond vitiligo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZX86 (Reply #204)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:40 PM

213. Michael Jackson didn't exactly "adopt" the children.

He was married to the biological mother of the older two.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #213)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:47 PM

215. Well they look more Nordic than Thor

and the girl on the Swiss Miss chocolate box. I'm no genetics expert but I don't think fathered those kids biologically.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZX86 (Reply #215)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:53 PM

218. Ugh celebrity gossip

I hesitate to go there, but I read that the actor who played Oliver! in the movie of the same name donated sperm for those pregnancies.

However, he and Michael Jackson were friends and I think it was out of friendship. I wouldn't assume it was because Michael Jackson wanted white babies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZX86 (Reply #215)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:39 PM

229. Regardless of who the bio father is, the older two are not "adopted."

Since Michael Jackson was legally married to the mother, he is automatically considered their father. And the third one doesn't look "Nordic."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:29 PM

69. Her embracing "black culture" isn't the issue.

Nor is her work with the NAACP.

Her lying about hate crimes and her heritage over and over again is the issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to romanic (Reply #69)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:13 PM

134. CORRECT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to romanic (Reply #69)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:12 PM

152. +1

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 06:53 PM

74. I completely agree

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:20 PM

80. From what I can tell from what I've read, she is mentally ill.

 

This ongoing criticism and denigration makes no sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maedhros (Reply #80)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:15 PM

109. I agree

 

Mentally disturbed and out of touch with reality. Imagine what the outrage would be if a light-skinned
REAL African-American woman claimed she was white?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:27 PM

83. The NAACP doesn't and didn't care and that's enough for me.

I don't understand why so many people even care about this and why it's a big deal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:33 PM

87. nope. rd has lost credibility by attempting to change her race. lying about her race did nothing

for her, outside of making her a trending topic. maybe that was her intent. if she wanted to define herself, certainly there had to be a better way to go about it other than being a liar. if we were to go with the whole "borrowing from the black culture to define herself," line, then what is that saying exactly? are we to believe that part of the definition of being black is to be a liar? because that's kinda what's being said with that line of reasoning. if she is upset that she is getting so much media attention, perhaps she should have thought about that before concocting such a stupid scheme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:06 PM

105. There are several big differences between Rachel Dolezal and Iron-Eyes Cody

 

Cody got where he was because studios simply would not hire Native actors at the time. he did misrepresent himself - but in so doing he was not taking parts away from people with the actual descent, as there were few to none at the time. And the dud gave back, big-time, he worked with and learned from numerous native communities, and put his wealth into helping them. he fostered and adopted native children, funded schools and hospitals, joined their causes. An the whole time, they knew he was an Italian dude. But for the most part, he was respected (or at least well-tolerated) because of how much he put in.

Dolezal on the other hand, appears to have knowingly been making efforts to step over and take advantage of people with her charade. She lied and lied and lied some more, purely for selfish gain. and the black community has, by and large, rejected her now that she's "out."

There are some similarities between the two people, but they cannot be equated at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scootaloo (Reply #105)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:08 PM

132. He lied about his Cherokee-Cree heritage...

The analogy couldn't be more perfect.

He received Native American acting parts when there were actual Native American actors who would have qualified in his place. He falsified records of his birth and maintained the 'indigenous Native American' ploy until his dying day.

He frequently changed his place of birth when providing documentation. He lived as if he were of indigenous Native American descent, on and off the screen.

He was hired for hundreds of film and television roles as a Native American, based on his falsified claim of being Cherokee-Cree. He even landed a gig to do 'Indian chanting' on a Joni Mitchell album:

The Joni Mitchell song "Lakota," from the 1988 album, Chalk Mark in a Rainstorm, features Cody's chanting.[5]

I'm not trying to say anything against the man, I'm merely using his case as an example of people "passing" as one race or another for a multitude of reasons. Lying is part of the ruse.

He married two Native American women and adopted two children of Native American descent, with his first wife.

The analogy fits like a glove.

Who, exactly, did Rachel Dolezal "take advantage of with her charade?" Yes, it appears that she lied or stretched the truth but so did Iron-Eyes Cody; and it was his family... his half sister who finally outed him, three years before he died.

I have no ill will toward Iron-Eyes Cody and I have none for Rachel Dolezal. Yes, he supported Native American causes. So did Rachel; support African American causes. I don't have one iota of disdain for either one of them.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:14 PM

108. Two things

 

She openly disowned her white biological parents and even
was photographed with a black man she identified as her father.

And - she LIED. It's one thing to "represent" what you believe in,
it's another thing to DECEIVE.

No one should trust her now. There is NO excuse for her completely
denying her white heritage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ann--- (Reply #108)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:39 PM

119. Oh, heaven forbid one deny their white heritage

No excuse for that!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #119)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:14 PM

153. You're silly.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 840high (Reply #153)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:23 PM

156. What a thoughtful reply n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #156)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:59 PM

158. sorry

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcr (Reply #119)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:05 PM

201. It's not a new phenomenon.

"Hey, you know something people?
I'm not black,
But there's a whole lots a times
I wish I could say I'm not white."

"Trouble Every Day". 1966

Frank Zappa

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:23 PM

113. She didn't just lie about her race.

1. She lied about who her father was.
2. She claimed her adopted brother (who happens to be African American) as her biological son.
3. MJ never said he was white. He had a medical condition which effected his skin pigmentation.
4. No one is faulting her for exploring African American culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #113)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:42 PM

140. Michael Jackson...

...likely had body dysmorphic disorder and altered skin pigmentation from bleaching his skin. I'm a huge fan of Michael Jackson and continue to defend his right to alter his outward appearance in any way that made him happy.

Jackson's skin was a medium-brown color throughout his youth, but, starting in the mid 1980s, his skin gradually grew more pale through what was widely considered to be skin bleaching and changing of his features to appear European. According to Jackson biographer J. Randy Taraborrelli, Jackson began making his nose smaller around the same time his skin became very gradually lighter and that he was using the over-the-counter skin-bleaching cream called Porcelana to achieve the lighter skin. Taraborrelli reported that Jackson's sister La Toya used Porcelana too, and that they had crates of this cream stored at their family home Hayvenhurst, "hoarding it as the most valuable beauty product ever produced."[5] Jackson's physical changes gained widespread media coverage,[6] and provoked criticism from the public. African American psychologists argued Jackson was "a lousy role model for black youth". Dr. Dennis Chestnut said Jackson gave "black youth a feeling that they can achieve", but also may encourage some people to think they've got to be esoteric and idiosyncratic to be successful. It was also presumed that Jackson bleached his skin just to boost his career. Dr. Halford Fairchild stated Jackson and other African American celebrities would try "to look more like white people in order to get in films and on television".[7]

According to Taraborrelli, in 1986, Jackson was diagnosed with vitiligo, which Tarraborrelli noted was sometimes considered by doctors to be a consequence of damage done by bleaching chemicals over the years.[1] However, skin bleaching is not the only suspected cause of vitiligo which is a rare non-contagious disease. The causes are not known, but a range of genetic, auto-immune, and environmental causes are suspected. Between 1% and 2% of the worldwide population are considered to be affected. The depigmentation occurs in patches, and affects all ethnic/racial groups equally.[8] While the disorder cannot be cured, the progression of the patches can be stopped.[9]

New York plastic surgeon Dr. Pamela Lipkin, who has never treated Jackson or reviewed his medical records, said, "when you look at the other features, the skin bleaching sort of goes along with what I think was his quest for beauty, so I have to wonder what came first? Vitiligo or lighter skin?" Noting that Jackson had even skin tone when he was younger, Lipkin's interpretation was that "probably he's trying to look Caucasian: His skin is whiter. His nose is getting thinner every six months. His lips are getting thinner. His eyebrows are getting higher. His eyes are getting wider every time. His cheekbones are getting bigger."[10]
When producer Quincy Jones who worked closely with Jackson at the time Jackson's skin transformation began, was asked about Jackson's facial transformation he stated: "It's ridiculous, man! Chemical peels and all of it. And I don't understand it. But he obviously didn't want to be black...You see his kids?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson%27s_health_and_appearance[11]

The Jacksons were traumatized as children by their father. In 2003, Joe Jackson admitted to whipping his children when they were young.

Who knows what the truth is behind Rachel Dolezal's upbringing? Ultimately, at some point, the truth will come out.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #140)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:16 PM

160. Michael Jackson had a skin disease

As well as thousands of other people. It's called vitiligo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Catherine Vincent (Reply #160)

Sun Jun 14, 2015, 11:25 PM

162. If you insist. ..nt

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #162)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 06:53 AM

171. Actually, he did, and his autopsy confirmed it.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/07/showbiz/jackson-death-trial/


Rogers noted in his autopsy report that Jackson's lips were tattooed pink, while his eyebrows were a dark tattoo. The front of his scalp was also tattooed black, apparently to blend his hairline in with the wigs he wore.

The autopsy confirmed what Jackson told people who questioned why his skin tone became lighter in the 1980s. Jackson had "vitiligo, a skin pigmentation disease," Rogers said. "So, some areas of the skin appear light and others appear dark."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:10 AM

163. Please stop

 

Dear lord

she hand the audcity to tell a Hispanic women she wasn't Hispanic enough to be part of the blacklivematter movement .

She a fraud , need to step down , and seek help. I have yet to see the good she has done for the blk community of Spokane!

There white people that do great jobs for the blk community and understand the culture without putting black face and making a mockery of black culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CTBlueboy (Reply #163)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:20 AM

164. Do you have a link to this?...

re: "she hand the audcity to tell a Hispanic women she wasn't Hispanic enough to be part of the blacklivematter movement."

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #164)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:38 AM

166. .

Rachel Dolezal Once Told A Student She Did Not Look Hispanic Enough For A Class Activity
http://www.buzzfeed.com/tamerragriffin/rachel-dolezal-once-told-a-student-she-did-not-look-hispanic#.wnAeybMKN

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #166)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 01:14 AM

167. Interesting in its irony. Thanks. ..nt

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #167)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 03:20 AM

168. she's a fraud

 

If she wants to embrace the black culture fine, but don't think blackness can be turn on and off !

I'm still wondering what good has she done for the blk community ? since that the first thing her defenders say !

Her faking hate crime makes it harder for real victims of racism to be taken serious

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CTBlueboy (Reply #168)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:51 PM

217. "Faking hate crime makes it harder for real victims of racism"

"Her faking hate crime makes it harder for real victims of racism to be taken serious"

Thank you for making that statement!

I don't know why it's so difficult for some others to understand that.

She has done real damage to the cause of fighting racism up here in the Northwest.


Welcome to DU, CTBlueboy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #217)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:06 AM

231. Thank you

 

appreciate the warm welcome

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 03:30 AM

169. It is ok for anyone to embrace black culture!

The NAACP embraces all people of different ethnic origin. However, she lied about her etnicity and perhaps taken a scholarship from someone from a diverse background, who deserved it more than she did.

Lying is not acceptable. Lying shows that you are not credible!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:39 AM

172. Rachel Dolezal would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling kids

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 12:15 PM

174. 1. Cody was wrong, too. OKAY? 2. Channing had the DNA, likd Tiger. 3. RD is not Black.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:21 PM

176. Rachel has the right to be who she feels and believes she is. This poutrage about her is

over-drama from the media, like "How dare she be black?" If it's ok for Bruce Jenner to become Caitlyn Jenner, why can't Rachel embrace the race she feels she is?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #176)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 07:38 PM

183. I feel like I should be next in line to the British throne.

When can I expect to be declared a Queen of England?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LisaL (Reply #183)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:24 AM

240. You're gonna have to duke that out with the Queen.

But realistically, are you against transgender?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to gollygee (Reply #189)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:39 PM

196. Gollygee, did you know what Dolezal did on Friday night?

http://www.kirotv.com/news/news/questions-raised-about-spokane-naacp-head/nmbmH/

Dolezal, meanwhile, has declined to comment directly about her background, saying Thursday the "question is not as easy as it seems. There's a lot of complexities, and I don't know that everyone would understand that."

She couldn't be reached Friday when contacted by The Associated Press.

Friday night, she tweeted, “I am very happy to see more people joining us #TransracialLivesMatter #WrongSkin.”

She also tweeted a picture of herself next to a picture of Caitlyn Jenner, with the caption “who are you to decide what is right for me?”


Thanks for posting the link to your thread yesterday...I missed that one completely. Reading it now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #196)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:42 PM

197. Yes, I saw that

I am getting annoyed by seeing the two situations compared, over and over and over again, and seeing people say that she "BECAME" a woman or decided to become a woman.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to countryjake (Reply #198)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:48 PM

199. Good post! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #196)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:03 PM

209. I think kirotv got fooled by a parody account

I've got nothing to offer in defense of Dolezal, don't get me wrong, but that account was started on June 12, about the time the controversy broke, so I highly doubt it's really her.

https://twitter.com/_RachelDolezal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fishwax (Reply #209)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:32 PM

211. See, I wondered about that when I posted it on Sat. I tend to agree.

The weirdos have been coming out of the woodwork online since Friday, especially with the bigoted attacks against trans people and spewing idiotic comparisons with Dolezal's ruse. I don't do Twitter, but I might just give KIRO a call and point out what you've noted to them. They should post a retraction if it's a phony account, so maybe they will.

Thanks for the heads-up!

(not gonna click on that twitter link...wouldn't want to give her (if it's real) or whatever bigot created it (if it's fake) any hits, at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to countryjake (Reply #211)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:36 PM

212. I agree with you on all of that



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #189)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:47 AM

243. I did not say or imply that Caitlyn decided she was female. What I am saying is:

If people know definitively from the time they are little that they are a different gender than their bodies, and this is accepted by society as real, then why can that not also be true about race?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #243)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 01:59 PM

245. Because they aren't equivalent

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gollygee (Reply #245)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 02:19 PM

246. I see and accept her point.

People have believed for many years that transgender people were making it up. Now society knows that is not the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #176)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 08:36 PM

194. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:32 PM

206. Cody was wrong too.

And the NAACP has gotten tons of pushback on social media from Black activists. It's a great org but they aren't infallible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 09:49 PM

208. She probably suffered some traumatic experience

in her childhood and this is the way she's dealing with it. Having said that, assuming a different persona is hardly something unusual to the human condition. Halloween is the most popular adult holiday. Cosplay is more popular than ever. First person video games. Furries. You name it. People love to dress up and assume alternate identities for whatever reason. I am more fascinated by her behavior than I am offended by it.

I think some counseling for her would probably be appropriate. I don't have enough energy to hate on her. Her life seems sad enough already.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 10:44 PM

214. I support Caitlyn and Rachel.

Rachel obviously went about expressing her true racial identity in the wrong way, but I'd imagine she didn't have much support or many transracial role models. Yes, Rachel lied. Jenner lied to his first wife who thought she was marrying a man when Jenner knew all along that she was a really a woman. She lied to the athletic authorities and said she was a man knowing that she is in fact a woman.

Jenner got the courage to tell the truth that she's a woman, and stop living the lie that she's a man. It was difficult because people are not accepting and she knew people would accuse her off having mental health problems and worse. Before expressing her gender identity to the rest of the world, she enjoyed the privileges that came along with being a man.

Rachel got the courage to tell the truth that she's black and stop living the lie that she's Caucasian. Before Rachel had the courage to express her true racial identity, she had white privilege. Rachel can't "go back" to being white anymore than Jenner can "go back" to being a man.

Jenner is a woman, regardless of dress, hairstyle, or inborn physical characteristics. Rachel is an African American person, regardless of dress, hairstyle, or inborn physical characteristics. It's unfortunate that it makes some people uncomfortable for Rachel to express her true identity publically because it doesn't fit their world view.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #214)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:02 PM

219. Transracial isn't a thing.

 

It's a ridiculous strawman brought up by the white nationalist site VDARE to piss on transgender people.

Stop parroting that nonsense here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #219)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:05 PM

220. Wrong.

trans·ra·cial
\(ˌtran(t)s-ˈrā-shəl, (ˌtranz-\adjective

:involving, encompassing, or extending across two or more races<transracial adoption>

First Use: 1970


Also, what word would you prefer that she use to describe her?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #220)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:09 PM

221. Don't assume I'm a fucking idiot.

 

Interracial adoption and "transracial" as transforming a person's physical appearance are not the same thing.

Seriously, fail. Fail. Stop it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #221)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:13 PM

223. You claimed it was invented by some group/website. What word

could Rachel describe herself with that would make you comfortable?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #223)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:20 PM

225. Liar, fraud.

 

"Transracial" as a concept (not just a term, a concept) was developed by hatemongerers to bash transgender people, and you've fallen for it perfectly.

There's absolutely no evidence supporting any sort of "transracial" phenomenon. There is significant evidence supporting gender dysphoria and transgender as a phenomenon.

Just stop, seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #225)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:27 PM

226. Wow. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #226)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:34 PM

227. Exactly my reaction when I saw Breitbart and VDARE getting pushed in your posts.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NuclearDem (Reply #227)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:39 PM

228. Slate, actually. You are something else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #228)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:49 PM

230. Race is a social construct based on inherited traits.

 

Gender is an identity formed by preferences towards what society calls masculine and what society calls feminine.

They are not comparable. Stop insisting they are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #223)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:09 AM

232. How about serial liar?

How about mentally ill?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #232)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:15 AM

233. Yes, yes, burn the witch. No compassion, terrible person. Got it, got it, got it. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #233)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:21 AM

234. My compassion is with her parents,

who have had to endure the lies she told about them.
This woman needs professional help and I hope she gets it and is able to repair her relationship with her parents and go on with her life.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #214)

Mon Jun 15, 2015, 11:10 PM

222. WWhy Rachel Dolezal’s Fake ‘Transracial’ Identity Is Nothing Like Being Transgender

http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/06/rachel-dolezal-not-transracial/


(video at site, from an African American trans woman)

editing to try to get video right in this post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #214)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:28 AM

235. I'm going to step in here...

...and see if I can help to stop you from hurting yourself...

First of all, I appreciate everything that you said in defense of Rachel Dolezal, and in defense of trans women everywhere. Your motives are pure and your intentions are admirable.

That said, Rachel Dolezal is not black. She may love black people. She may have grown up around black friends and siblings. She may identify and prefer blackness as an experience and a way of life. She may even dream in mostly black, vs. white.... But, she's not black.

She's a confused individual who may have grown up in a truly fucked up environment. Her 'blackness' appears to be some screwed up vendetta and retaliation against her family; her parents in particular... and who could blame her? (They suck.) But, using blackness to get back at your parents is pretty messed up.

Rachel Dolezar is not African American. 50,000 years of evolution (sorry creationists) has washed the African continent right out of her gene pool. Whether ruse or reality, she Just. Aint. Black. At least not in any accepted scientific rubric of measurement.

Yes, she loved, emulated and supported the idea of being African American. It makes sense that she would do that, with black siblings and an African American husband.

I'll stop this soliloquy, but suffice it to say, there's more to this story than meets the eye. This woman ain't right, and only time can flesh out the truth behind the sordid reality show that we're now being made to witness...

Thank you, prayin4rain, for attempting to defend the LGBT community and trans women in particular. Your intentions are honorable. However, don't get caught up in the train wreck that is Rachel Dolezal... Those cars are already all over the tracks and, at this juncture, you're only going to get hurt. (Or lose a limb.) The choice is yours.

TYY



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #235)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:39 AM

236. Haha, thanks. I've been reading more articles

and I think I get it. Rachel was not three or four years old feeling like an African American person.

She grew up, identified with African Americans and DECIDED to start trying to look black. But, she didn't stop there, she also started telling a whole bunch of damaging lies.

I do tend to be a bit overly sympathetic. I appreciate your response and I will take the other poster's advice and just stop it. Haha

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to prayin4rain (Reply #236)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:51 AM

237. I'm with you, my friend...

How a person rolls is nobody's business but their own. That said, this Rachel business is a sticky wicket and standing back, while watching it play out is the best advice I can give.

TYY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Reply #237)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 12:54 AM

238. Thank you,

I really appreciate your kindness and I will do that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeeYiYi (Original post)

Tue Jun 16, 2015, 08:55 AM

239. To take an identity that is not yours...

...and then to present yourself as speaking FOR that group is just wrong. My people deal with this shit all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread