General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you could pick your opponent: Who would you want to see on the GOP 2016 ticket?
Assuming you want the GOP to field their most vulnerable, easily-beaten candidate.
EXTRA CREDIT: Who would be the last/worst-case GOP candidate if they were to win?

sinkingfeeling
(49,970 posts)Smithryee
(157 posts)so everyone else can vote Democratic and not be "racist".
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Vinca
(49,901 posts)I don't know about vulnerable/easily beaten, but it sure would be amusing.
shraby
(21,946 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)At least he would contribute to the entertainment factor.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)But there's more than just easily defeated to consider. I'd rather it were a clear choice - making it clear what Republicans stand for.
Bryant
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Rand Paul is similarly nutty, but his libertarian gloss makes him a better opponent to highlight the differences, I think.
Bryant
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)They can say, oh no, as a party we don't believe those things. For instance, Paul is more isolationist than the vast majority of the republican base.
Cruz is an extremist and fanatic, but his positions are the republican positions--or what the republican base really wants the positions to be. They just differ on tactics.
qwlauren35
(5,777 posts)They would lose. Too many racists in the party wouldn't vote for him. The Independents don't respect her.
It would be a slam dunk.
The only way it would backfire would be if all of the racists held their collective noses and voted for him to prove that they weren't racist. I think that's how Tim Scott won. Nothing else makes sense.