General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmalaise
(268,724 posts)johnnyreb
(915 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)snip* In early coverage of a breaking story, details are commonly sketchy, usually due to the limited information that is available at the time. For example, during the Sago Mine disaster, there were initial reports that all twelve miners were found alive, but news organizations later learned that only one actually survived.
Often it is considered important to be quick with news bulletins also for less important news. Such news might not be mentioned on later days, even if it was found that information was wrong.
Another criticism has been the diluting of the importance of "breaking news" by the need of 24-hour news channels to fill time, applying the title to soft news stories of questionable importance and urgency (for example, car chases). Others question as to whether the use of the term is excessive, citing occasions when the term is used even though scheduled programming is not interrupted.[6] Some programs, such as HLN's Nancy Grace, have even used the term for events which occurred months before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaking_news
liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)If you are searching for the origin then maybe the beginning is the end ...