Feinstein, who was on when I decided to express my favorable opinion of her show. What I did was give Dana the name Diane, but gave it an "a" on the end. Both ladies should be mad.
She started with one of the House members who is against signing the Homeland Security bill until the President does something about his executive order on immigration. She was her usual harsh self in a way I liked. Didn't get his name, but that segment dealt with the coup to remove Boener.
Was never a fan or critic of Diane Feinstein, but today I am a fan. When Dana asked her about the Netanyehu visit, she said she would go to hear him, but disagrees with his view on Iran. She explained that there are 5 nations besides us (US) in on the talks, and that Israel would benefit if a deal were made. Dana said, paraphrasing, "Netanyehu says that he speaks for ALL Jews," and was he speaking for her (Feinstein), and she said, "NO, not in this." I admire her courage in saying this because of all the pressure she must be getting. She also said that his speech would no doubt criticize the President and didn't like that idea.
The whole show was good, and should be on later, instead of Forensics, Eating with Bourdain, looking for criminals with Hunt, spending the night with howars-Life, and tonight with Jesus.
CNN's treasure is the group of reporters they have, not the specials that belong on other channels...
= new reply since forum marked as read
