Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 06:59 PM Apr 2012

Help us protest the DISGUSTING segment on 60 Minutes that allowed the torturer

Jose Rodriguez state, unopposed, that the torture was legal and appropriate:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2162/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=10338

Sign & send (link included)

Dear “60 Minutes”:

The segment you did last night with Jose Rodriguez, former chief of the CIA’s Counter Terrorism Center, was enlightening about Mr. Rodriguez' central role in the CIA interrogations program and his support for the use of torture. But it did not provide an opportunity for those who challenge Mr. Rodriguez' view or his statement of facts -- of whom there are many. Important facts were missing:

The legal memo Mr. Rodriguez relied on was withdrawn by his own administration and has been widely discredited as shockingly poor legal analysis.

Experienced interrogators and Senator John McCain, a victim of torture himself, strongly disagree with Mr. Rodriguez' claim that torture works.

The UN Convention Against Torture, which we signed in 1994, prohibits torture by any country under any circumstance, even the threat of terrorism.

I urge you to produce another segment that presents the facts on torture by knowledgeable and well-respected persons who will emphasize that torture is immoral and illegal.

Torture is wrong, and your program should not leave the impression that it may be permissible in certain circumstances.

Thank you,


Please.. Do it, rec it, kick it, tweet it, face it...etc etc

I love you guys.
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help us protest the DISGUSTING segment on 60 Minutes that allowed the torturer (Original Post) annabanana Apr 2012 OP
Misleading Sycophant Monsters ,MSM orpupilofnature57 Apr 2012 #1
It's a wonder that I have an intact annabanana Apr 2012 #3
k & r, nt Royal Sloan 09 Apr 2012 #2
Done. I felt like doing this while watching tabatha Apr 2012 #4
you and me both NoMoreWarNow Apr 2012 #8
The Forth Reich? zeemike Apr 2012 #19
Only The People can insist on fixing this. annabanana Apr 2012 #23
On the 60 Minutes web site LittleGirl Apr 2012 #5
Then it has required push back for a long time. annabanana Apr 2012 #9
thank you annabanana Voice for Peace May 2012 #32
yes-- it's hardly new, but it still needs to be condemned NoMoreWarNow Apr 2012 #10
The American Age chervilant May 2012 #29
thanks. LittleGirl May 2012 #33
Done!! Thanks for the link LASlibinSC Apr 2012 #6
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #7
done ! nt steve2470 Apr 2012 #11
K&R and Done! Rhiannon12866 Apr 2012 #12
also a sickening part of this story-- NoMoreWarNow Apr 2012 #13
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner. This obvious LuckyLib Apr 2012 #14
I think it's time to say good-bye to 60 Minutes. n/t Hermes Daughter Apr 2012 #18
+1,000!! SunSeeker May 2012 #40
Is there a word for "more shameless than shameless"? annabanana Apr 2012 #16
Did they disclose this when they ran the story? SunSeeker May 2012 #41
the media has many conflicts of interest fascisthunter May 2012 #50
K&R raouldukelives Apr 2012 #15
Done! Thanks! Hermes Daughter Apr 2012 #17
Thank you. spreading the outrage is our best weapon. . .n/t annabanana May 2012 #30
Done.... This enraged everybody in the room watching it with me MrMickeysMom Apr 2012 #20
k&r... spanone Apr 2012 #21
Done. EFerrari Apr 2012 #22
Done! onestepforward Apr 2012 #24
K&R'd. snot May 2012 #25
K & R! lonestarnot May 2012 #26
60 Minutes and all other MSMedia whores can KISS MY ASS just1voice May 2012 #27
Done nt duhneece May 2012 #28
No TV byeya May 2012 #31
K&R n/t Hermes Daughter May 2012 #34
signed, sealed, delivered, kicked Ninga May 2012 #35
I think they did a great job. Swede May 2012 #36
Can his "testimony" on 60 minutes be turned into an idictment? dickthegrouch May 2012 #37
I think there was a memo or something that said torturers are now above the law. Dragonfli May 2012 #48
For perspective:one of my Republican friends Johonny May 2012 #38
Holy shit....... AverageJoe90 May 2012 #39
I watched the segment on 60 mins and had a different impression SacoMaine61 May 2012 #42
I agree. Jose does not come across as a very sane or stable human being 99th_Monkey May 2012 #47
I don't understand why people expect news to be confrontational loyalsister May 2012 #43
Yes "news" should objectively provide the facts. Investigative journalism should rhett o rick May 2012 #44
I agree- if they ONLY present one side repeatedly loyalsister May 2012 #45
No one is expecting Stahl to YELL at him.. annabanana May 2012 #49
I am sick of "interviewers" that do nothing more than enable idiots to spew their crap. nm rhett o rick May 2012 #53
I think the good cop interviewer may get more facts loyalsister May 2012 #56
K&R 99th_Monkey May 2012 #46
K & R !!! WillyT May 2012 #51
Covering their a** madisongrace May 2012 #52
K&R Starboard Tack May 2012 #54
done! crunch60 May 2012 #55
kickety! countryjake May 2012 #57
Thank you countryjake annabanana May 2012 #58
Will do and will pass it on as well... markpkessinger May 2012 #59

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
19. The Forth Reich?
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:44 PM
Apr 2012

That is what happened in Germany...they allowed their leaders to lead them down the path of the end justifying the means ...and abandoned all morality and decency.
And they are trying to sell it to us right now....with the same sales pitch.

LittleGirl

(8,280 posts)
5. On the 60 Minutes web site
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:39 PM
Apr 2012

there is a link to the FBI's side of this story (taped Sept 2011) and everyone who saw that segment last night should view the FBI one too. Some of the claims of Mr. Rodriquez's are disputed in that FBI video.

I agree torture is wrong, always and I'm ashamed my country was involved in it.

But I've been reading Howard Zinn's book "The People's History of the United States" and it leads me to believe that this has been our way (or humans' way) for a long time. Sadly.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
9. Then it has required push back for a long time.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:57 PM
Apr 2012

And we cannot deem civilization achieved until we manage to get it stopped.

Thanks.

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
10. yes-- it's hardly new, but it still needs to be condemned
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 07:58 PM
Apr 2012

we HAVE to protest this abuse of our name.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
29. The American Age
Tue May 1, 2012, 08:15 AM
May 2012

by Walter LaFeber is an exceptional book, detailing US Foreign Policy. Our nation has long been the Bully in the Global Sandbox.

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
13. also a sickening part of this story--
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:10 PM
Apr 2012

Rodriguez's book (for which the 60 Minutes appearance a promotional appearance) is being published by Simon & Schuster - a division of CBS.

LuckyLib

(6,817 posts)
14. Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner. This obvious
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:15 PM
Apr 2012

promotion of the book caused me to ask my SO if CBS was linked to the publisher. Bingo! These so-called journalists are disgusting. The book should have been allowed to hit the remainder bin within 3 days of arriving at a bookstore. Instead, CBS gives it 30 minutes of free advertising -- for a foray into criminal behavior and blatant disregard for human rights that now signifies who we have become.

SunSeeker

(51,522 posts)
41. Did they disclose this when they ran the story?
Tue May 1, 2012, 12:03 PM
May 2012

Sorry, I could not bring myself to watch the story, so I'm hoping you know....

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
15. K&R
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 08:28 PM
Apr 2012

"When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares back at you."

To top it off I wouldn't shocked if Mr. Rodriguez self identified as a Christian.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
20. Done.... This enraged everybody in the room watching it with me
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 09:33 PM
Apr 2012

All I could say was, "How DARE you get your 15 minutes of fame with this bullshit?"

Of course, Current TV was wasting no time going after it with TYT and Eliot doing their follow up.... but, where is the outrage for this junk?

Kick this often and write 60 minutes, please!

 

just1voice

(1,362 posts)
27. 60 Minutes and all other MSMedia whores can KISS MY ASS
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:42 AM
May 2012

They decided a long time ago to act as if torture is a debatable topic so they could pump up their exploitative ratings with all types of human suffering. Read the boards over at 60 minutes at the story's link, it's full of pro-torture comments from like-minded psychopaths who, like the MSM whores, need to think about forcefully making other humans suffer in order to make themselves feel remotely alive.

They are sick and will continue to produce "segments" like that, they only care about their ratings and themselves. A letter, a protest, real information: none of that matters to them.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
31. No TV
Tue May 1, 2012, 10:06 AM
May 2012

My wife and I threw out our TV 5 years ago and we have not missed it.
As Lilly Tomlin said: "Things will get worse before they get worse."

Swede

(33,208 posts)
36. I think they did a great job.
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:33 AM
May 2012

If they had been confrontational,he may have clammed up. Instead he sang like a lark.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
48. I think there was a memo or something that said torturers are now above the law.
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:21 PM
May 2012

Someone filed a writ of "look forward instead of at the criminals".

I am no lawyer but my understanding is that if this is invoked no crimes that are committed in the past can be prosecuted, I think the only way to beat this new defense is to arrest the torturers for crimes they haven't YET committed.

That is pretty hard to do without three precogs in the tub.

Johonny

(20,820 posts)
38. For perspective:one of my Republican friends
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:36 AM
May 2012

and his other Republican campaign buddies (many working the Romney campaign) thought the segment was too hard hitting. They felt all the questions were angled like some how torture was illegal! (can you imagine that). They felt the segment was too much a left wing attack on a no brainer great Bush white house move. They laughed off all the questioned techniques as not even torture.

To me the fact our own American interrogation agencies have pretty much all come out against the techniques used and point out they hurt American actions not help. Even if the shit (that is totally torture) were somehow not, who gives a fuck the actions don't work to get good actionable intelligence. The Bush White house legalize torture to do some thing mean spirited that had no positive consequences. Yet some how my Republican friends want me to think in the future people will remember the Bush white house better than it currently is. L O L

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
39. Holy shit.......
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:45 AM
May 2012

Believe it or not, I actually heard this guy on the radio this morning......(KSKY 660, Dallas/Ft. Worth for those who wanted to know.).

SacoMaine61

(114 posts)
42. I watched the segment on 60 mins and had a different impression
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:05 PM
May 2012

I think 60 Minutes did a good job of showing how maladjusted this former CIA chief is. I cannot believe that someone of his (low) caliber was put in charge of anything. Definitely not a deep thinker and clearly someone who was eager to push the envelope on interrogation techniques. He came across as dull-witted and in denial.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
47. I agree. Jose does not come across as a very sane or stable human being
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:58 PM
May 2012

there were even a couple of times where he started to come unglued because the interviewer
asked him something he didn't like. His voice started to raise like he was about to slap the
shit out of her. Quite disturbing to watch actually, knowing what all this guy has been engaged
in and all.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
43. I don't understand why people expect news to be confrontational
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:43 PM
May 2012

The historically credible informative news outlets reported facts not interrogation.
Now, when anyone tries to gather facts without judgement they are considered biased. It's a sad sad state, not only of journalism but of the expectation of what it should be.

When shouting matches are considered informative, it's no wonder there is a voyeuristic demand for reality TV.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
44. Yes "news" should objectively provide the facts. Investigative journalism should
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:35 PM
May 2012

try to present both sides of an issue. If they present only one side, it's propaganda.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
45. I agree- if they ONLY present one side repeatedly
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:44 PM
May 2012

The alternative is not necessarily to present both sides in a confrontational manner.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
49. No one is expecting Stahl to YELL at him..
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:21 PM
May 2012

But asking him to confront a fact or two during his screed wouldn't have been amiss...

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
56. I think the good cop interviewer may get more facts
Tue May 1, 2012, 07:20 PM
May 2012

People put up defenses when they are challenged too much. Fox, round table discussions, interviews with consultants, etc. have led people to believe good journalism isn't about exposing facts. It's about gotcha interviewing that just perpetuates the ridiculous shouting matches people seem to enjoy for some reason.

madisongrace

(63 posts)
52. Covering their a**
Tue May 1, 2012, 06:29 PM
May 2012

I think this was done to protect someone or someone's. It sounded like a cover-up in the making.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
58. Thank you countryjake
Wed May 2, 2012, 10:01 PM
May 2012
[font color="green"]I haven't seen any mention of the distress this broadcast caused. At least not yet.[/font]

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
59. Will do and will pass it on as well...
Wed May 2, 2012, 10:14 PM
May 2012

I was utterly appalled by that segment. But what was even worse was when I went to 60 Minutes' website to post a comment. The majority of the comments expressed disapproval of CBS, not for the very good reasons you cite, but rather because Lesley Stahl had been permitted to "trash such a fine American." The comments truly sickened me.

As I pointed out in the comment I left, my problem was not that Lesley Stahl had been too hard on Rodriguez, but rather because it was such a soft-ball interview. I also pointed out that I found Ms. Stahl's intimation to the effect that ordinary Americans have no way of knowing who they should believe between the FBI and CIA quite disingenuous. The FBI, after all, had been in the business of interrogations for decades, whereas the CIA is quite new to the game.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Help us protest the DISGU...