General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat is CISPA? Why Should YOU, or I, CARE ABOUT CISPA?
CISPA battlefield: Facts & FiguresThe House of Representatives has approved CISPA, a controversial bill that will give the government additional levers to monitor the Internet. But what are its chances of being passed into law, and what will it mean for Internet users?
In spite of protest from the Obama administration that CISPA encroaches on the civil liberties of Americans, the House of Representatives is marching ahead with the legislation. It met on Thursday to discuss the controversial act ahead of Fridays decision.
In addition, the House Rules Committee dismissed a list of changes to the legislation suggested by the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT). The amendments would have potentially limited private companies from sharing cyberthreat data with US government bodies.
By disregarding the amendments "the House leadership has squandered an opportunity to achieve balanced cybersecurity legislation," the CDT said in a statement.
What is CISPA?
CISPA, an abbreviation for the Cyber Intelligence Security and Protection Act, was introduced in the House of Representatives on November 30, 2011 by Mike Rogers (R-MI), as well as 111 co-sponsors. Since then, a number of amendments have been introduced. The House is expected to vote on the bill Friday and its author has said that the latest changes brought the number of supporting Congressmen well past the threshold of 218 necessary for the adoption of the legislation. It is therefore very likely that the bill will be passed by the House. However, its not all that certain whether the bill will be made into law, especially with the White Houses latest statement that President Obama would be advised to veto the legislation.
What does CISPA entail for internet users?
The act says it is meant to create procedures allowing elements of the intelligence community to share cyber threat intelligence with private-sector entities and to encourage the sharing of such intelligence. It also states that a cyber-security provider or a self-protected entity may share cyber threat information with any other entity designated by such protected entity, including the Federal Government.
But what does that mean?
Unnecessarily broad definitions are the factor which makes CISPA so controversial with web users.
Experts argue that the bill would give the government the ability to circumvent internet privacy laws and obtain information on user activities from private companies be it providers, hosting companies or social networks essentially any company involved in the Internet.
MORE HERE to INFORM...at.......
http://rt.com/usa/news/cispa-internet-facts-figures-006/
Risen Demon
(199 posts)without clicking accept at all.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)If he hadn't asked....why should we do it?
I AM A DEMOCRAT...and I'm an OLDER DEMOCRAT...
I am Distressed by EVERYTHING these days. BUT...I VOTE AND VOTE...even in MID-TERMS...and for LOCAL issues when most people don't bother to vote.
I WILL ALWAYS VOTE...because I pay attention.
I hope all of you out here in "DU Land" will take this as seriously as the Older Americans Do.
And...will also not be ROBOTIC in your voting like the REPUBLICONS.
There are always ways for DEMS to PROTEST and Make a DIFFERENCE. We just have to make it WORK! The DEMOCRATIC PARTY isn't or shouldn't be MONOLITHIC. It's a "work in progresss."
Just saying......
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)are Suspect.
I'm not saying this about you...but,....I hope you are not "Kicking" my post to serve some purposes that are certainly not my intent here on DU.
I've been here since the SELECTION OF BUSH II..
Folks who are here know this and will regard or disregard this post on the merits of what they find useful.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)Yes, of course I'm sincere. I even like the one you posted on DU2, which mentions Obama a little more directly and covers what you're talking about.