General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs John Boehner a Traitor?
[link:http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2015/01/john-boehner-traitor|
http://www.thomhartmann.com/blog/2015/01/john-boehner-traitor]
Is John Boehner a Traitor?
On Wednesday, the Speaker of the House confirmed that he had invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to come speak to Congress, on the grave threats radical Islam and Iran pose to our security and way of life.
The announcement just so happens to come as Republicans in Congress are pushing for new sanctions against Iran, which threaten current diplomatic negotiations with that country.
As of now, Netanyahu is expected to speak to a joint session of Congress in March, while hes in the U.S. for the annual AIPAC conference. So, why is Boehners invitation to Netanyahu such a big deal?
First off, its a HUGE violation of protocol and MASSIVELY disrespectful to President Obama and
NOw that you mention it. How about Reagan and HW Bush for the Iran Hostage Crisis?
TO late to prosecute Nixon
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Since IKE the right in America has been the most corrupt, ugly, racist, thieving bunch of disgusting pig fucks.
And the teaparty has that condition on steroids.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Couldn't have said it better myself
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Man, the people around here that will work overtime to defend John Boehner and the GOP
astounding, really
Are we gonna see the same people defend Nixon and Reagan next?
Response to NoJusticeNoPeace (Reply #4)
Post removed
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)never mind, i have reported that sick shit...
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)On Thu Jan 22, 2015, 07:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Right after you explain why you aren't guilty of raping and murdering a girl in 1990.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6124029
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
unbelievable, i am being accused of rape and murder
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jan 22, 2015, 07:26 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: aren,t guilty,not accused of anything.
context is everything
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is a reference to a Glenn Beck meme from a few years ago. It makes perfect sense given the post it is in reply to.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I know what Dsmoinesdem was trying, but that's an old glenn beck example and shouldn't be used here
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It's not appropriate to use the example of rape and murder by a DUer. Let's keep our conversation civil. Choose other metaphors next time. We get the point, but DU could degenerate into just nasty comments, accusations, and the like. It's not a crime to make a mistake in a post, but let's take the post off DU so other DUers don't copy the style. Like I said, not a crime. Just a mistake. But we just don't need that kind of uncontrolled overly emotional insult on DU. This is a place for rational talk.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No need to explain why.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No your are not. It might be an overly sarcastic response , but you are not so accused.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The "Chennault Incident" in which Nixon used Anna Chennault as a go between to convince South Vietnam's President Thieu to reject the peace-talks terms being offered by LBJ was nothing short of actionable treason. It undermined a significant foreign policy change made by a sitting POTUS. Nixon told Chennault to tell Thieu to reject the proposal because Thieu would be able to get "a better deal" if Nixon won the presidency.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)shadow of a doubt but pretty much accepted by most people.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Did that make her a traitor?
madokie
(51,076 posts)comparing apples to oranges always ruin a conversation
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)here lately
madokie
(51,076 posts)it happens quiet often around here lately
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Peace
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)It has to do with not resorting to bizarre hysteria over non-existent crime. This ridiculousness makes DU an internet laughingstock.
If a Democratic Congress was doing the exact same thing to a GOPer president the answers would be the same -- It's not treason.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If a Democratic Congress invited a foreign leader to address Congress over the objections of a GOP president it would not be treason.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)I will give you credit for a funny comeback...
No, really...
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Seems to at least be in the same ballpark.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)No President has any say over who does or does not appear before Congress.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Not even to be discussed as if it is
Obama, best I remember, didn't ask them not to. its just standard procedure or has been up to now
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)And somehow that is treason?
madokie
(51,076 posts)I say that what he has done is wrong headed and he knows that
Fuck Boehner
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)that framing has been labeled an "anti democratic attitude." Since yu seemed to agree with that labeling I can be forgiven for assuming you agree with the predicate discussion of treason.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I have no intention of continuing this discussion, its pointless at this point in time
Nothing personal here though and I hope you agree with that
madokie
(51,076 posts)and stupid to boot
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)- hic -
LOL
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Most drunks are.
madokie
(51,076 posts)not by me. I spent too many years as a drunk to go to liking them now that I'm sober
brush
(53,764 posts)It's an unprecedented, unheard of, intentional, behind the back, crap move designed to embarrass and snub the president.
No one but an arrogant ass of a head of state would do that to another head of state.
It's going to back fire on Boner and Netanyahu.
madokie
(51,076 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Of course, if the two of them start plotting to overthrow the government, my answer would change.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)You may be on to something.
madville
(7,408 posts)Wishes? Sure. Not in line with past etiquette or protocol? Yes.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)is deeply disturbing.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)And intellectually lazy!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And it gets old!
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)He's doing the bidding of folks in the House who want to know more about why Netanyahu wants more sanctions against Iran. (I'm relieved that he only wants sanctions, he used to want to bomb them and a few other countries)...
I think that Boehner made an anonymous phone call to Obama and told him about it. And the President made an anonymous call to Boehner, and they cooked up a plot to more or less humiliate the PM of Israel, and are hoping that a new PM is elected who is more likable, less bossy, and has a lot less of other bad qualities this (idiot) PM has. My opinions only.
They've had some real statesmen as PM's in Israel. Maybe we'll get another one in the coming election.
Good job Boehner, you too Mr. President, my President. You guys work well together. Time to change parties, John.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)madamesilverspurs
(15,800 posts)to watch Bibi's address to House members. Will Boehner pull faces?
C_U_L8R
(44,997 posts)a grand buffoon atop a whole pile of republican morons and meatheads
Blue Owl
(50,347 posts)n/t