Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFunny how tear gas only gets used on people exercising their 1st amendment rights but not their 2nd


The Daily Edge @TheDailyEdge
Follow
Funny how tear gas only gets used on people exercising their 1st amendment rights but not their 2nd amendment rights
8:05 PM - 11 Dec 2014
Follow
Funny how tear gas only gets used on people exercising their 1st amendment rights but not their 2nd amendment rights
8:05 PM - 11 Dec 2014
http://theobamadiary.com/
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Funny how tear gas only gets used on people exercising their 1st amendment rights but not their 2nd (Original Post)
Playinghardball
Dec 2014
OP
Yes, exactly. Rights abridged by a state response become privileges (or less). nt
appal_jack
Dec 2014
#13
It would be tyranny and authoritarianism to gas folks using their second amendment remedies??
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#12
benz380
(534 posts)1. Not really. There'd probably be a gun fight. n/t
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,272 posts)2. It's not about the rights.
It's about the people. The 2A folks are also generally free to exercise 1A without harassment, because they use it to express the views of the oligarchy.
stone space
(6,498 posts)3. Ammosexual Privilege (nt)
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)4. That's because they know that 2nd Amendment advocates pose no threat.
Free speech, on the other hand, might undo them.
brendan120678
(2,490 posts)5. Aren't those people exercising their 2nd...
Amendment rights also exercising their First Amendment rights at the same time?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)16. Looks that way to me
Perhaps there is some philosophical lesson to be learned here.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)6. You don't shoot things at people that might shoot back. n/t
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)7. Just goes to show you what The 1% are most scared of ...
free speech that exposes them for the slime balls they are,
v.
a few idiots toting guns parading around looking like jackasses,
ripcord
(5,553 posts)8. I think another picture would have wored better
They aren't breaking any laws and the picture even shows them using a crosswalk.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)9. Are we playing spot the sociopaths?
Ooh! Ooh!
I know! I know!
Ask me! Ask me!...
RandiFan1290
(6,496 posts)10. They are also allowed to threaten the White House
and block traffic
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)11. Actually, neither of the groups you
pictured should be tear gassed.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)13. Yes, exactly. Rights abridged by a state response become privileges (or less). nt
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)12. It would be tyranny and authoritarianism to gas folks using their second amendment remedies??
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)14. K&R
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)15. Guns are people, my friend. nt