HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Why the Huffington Post i...

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:35 AM

 

Why the Huffington Post is Shit!

More front page shit from the Huffington Post.

Be sure to check out the comments---they eviscerate HuffPo.




Emma Roberts is kind of our hero.

The 21-year-old actress and girlfriend of "Glee" star Chord Overstreet headed to lunch in Beverly Hills on Thursday wearing a super cute polka dot top but of course, Emma soon found herself being tailed by the paparazzi.

After Roberts ducked into her restaurant, the photographers decided to take photos inside the backseat of her car (questionable?), and their lenses seem to have found something surprising lying right out in the open: a pair of bra-stuffing devices.

The squishy chest enhancers, which are informally known as "chicken cutlets" for what they resemble (it's gross, we know), can be bought at stores like Victoria's Secret.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/20/emma-roberts-chicken-cutlets_n_1441548.html

22 replies, 20148 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 22 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why the Huffington Post is Shit! (Original post)
trumad Apr 2012 OP
jimlup Apr 2012 #1
trumad Apr 2012 #2
NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #3
NoMoreWarNow Apr 2012 #12
Mosaic Apr 2012 #4
YesURParanoid Apr 2012 #7
geckosfeet Apr 2012 #11
YesURParanoid Apr 2012 #5
hlthe2b Apr 2012 #6
gleannfia Apr 2012 #13
Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2012 #8
onehandle Apr 2012 #9
dipsydoodle Apr 2012 #10
MichaelMcGuire Apr 2012 #15
dipsydoodle Apr 2012 #18
MichaelMcGuire Apr 2012 #22
One of the 99 Apr 2012 #14
Tippy Apr 2012 #16
SomethingFishy Apr 2012 #21
TransitJohn Apr 2012 #17
NYC_SKP Apr 2012 #19
Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #20

Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:37 AM

1. And we should care because? /nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jimlup (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:41 AM

2. Because it's a so-called Progressive news site.

 

And one of their writers just won a Pulitzer.

BTW: Thanks for kicking my thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:42 AM

3. Yes, it is. I won't go there, for the last 3 or 4 years now.

 

It's crap, tripe, and propaganda.

and the pages take forever to load.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 09:49 AM

12. they have some good pieces but in general I avoid the site whenever possible

 

Sad...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:45 AM

4. They don't control their trolls

The site is rampant with ignorant, racist, 'right' wing trolls. The front page also always has some gross stuff on it, I don't mean nudity, I mean really gross sick stories and pictures. Lastly their politics page is not even center left, it is definitely center right to outright 'right', remember who bought the site after the old lady sold out, Aol!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mosaic (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:48 AM

7. When they merged with AOL

 

the RWers took over.

They made many of the RWers mods and they started purging the liberals and progressives.

HP is FreeRepublicLite now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mosaic (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 09:37 AM

11. Also remember Huffington herself was RW pundit before starting her blog.

I think that she has always been a RW troll.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:46 AM

5. Sure it may be sh_T but

 

more people will know about 'chicken cutlets' then what the GOP and DLC are doing to this country.

You and I may care about what is really going on in the world but to the majority 'chicken cutlets' are more important.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:47 AM

6. They've been so busy deleting even the mildest critical comments re: Breitbart...

that hardly leaves them any time for anything but TMZ plagiarizing.

We can refer to Huffpo as a 2%er... SInce at a maximum, that is how much "REAL" news content and honest commentary she allows on the site.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #6)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:04 AM

13. The lock-down the weekend Cheney

 

had his heart surgery was ridiculous. It was getting so deep in there with all of the sanguine well wishes, I wanted to retch. And in view of Cheney's recent nastiness toward Obama, I feel vindicated. I think the Greek Goddess lives in fear of litigation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:49 AM

8. Well, look at it this way...by them incorporating mindless, entertainment bs, it

expanded their audience. What could have been a left wing site, that only
left wingers read, like DU, they have broadened their base.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:54 AM

9. It's a T&A tabloid. Rupert Murdoch should get royalties from Arianna Huffington and AOL. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 09:05 AM

10. Huffington from my own experience

of checking it out occasionally is simply a news re-reporting site and as such pants.

I also glimpse at Fox occasionally at lunchtime here in the UK but only to check out Martha Maccallum's legs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #10)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:14 AM

15. I'm with you there (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MichaelMcGuire (Reply #15)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 11:00 AM

18. I did actually mean

stretched out standing up.

If you're on FB check out Mamie Van Doren sometime. Unbelievable legs for an 81 year old. She's good fun too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #18)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 01:39 PM

22. 81 years old!!!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:04 AM

14. Arianna Huffington is a grifter.

Because she opposed the Iraq war, she gained a lot of credibility on the left and used that to build her website.

However, she was a long time conservative Republican. In 2000 she supported Bush and repeatedly attack Al Gore in her Washington Times column. In 2006 and 2007, she constantly attacked Hillary Clinton, the then Democratic frontrunner, but was silent about the GOP field. Since President Obama took office she has blamed everything on him, yet there is no mention of the unprecedented obstruction by the GOP. When she does criticize the Republicans it is usually in the context of the Dems are just as bad as they are.

She has been completely silent about Paul Ryan's budgets as she was about the Bush tax cuts until the President agreed to extend them. Then she came out against them and blamed President Obama.

Recently, she has decided that the President will win re-election. So rather than hold Mitt Romney or the republicans to account; she has decided to go after the President instead.

This woman is a phony. People on the left need to realize this and call her on her BS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to One of the 99 (Reply #14)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:20 AM

16. Agreed....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to One of the 99 (Reply #14)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 12:23 PM

21. Yup.. Never went to her site, never wanted to

Never thought it was anything more than a money making scheme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:51 AM

17. It's a content farm

Providing fluff by algorithm for cash via clicks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_farm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 11:07 AM

19. T&A (nt)

 

~~

~~

~~

.

.

.

.

.

huffpo is crap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Original post)

Sat Apr 21, 2012, 12:07 PM

20. Not even my favorite gossip columnist, lainey, would stoop so low.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread