Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:47 PM Apr 2012

One thing that's not clear about this supposed new photo of Zimmerman

Wouldn't this statement:

"The person who took the photograph of a bloodied Zimmerman, asking not to be identified, told ABC News exclusively that they did not see the scuffle that night, but did hear it. The person recalled seeing Martin's prostrate body on the wet grass and said the gunpowder burns on Martin's gray hoodie were clearly visible. "
http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-tells-trayvon-martins-parents/story?id=16177849

be a real problem for Zimmerman considering this fact:

"They found Martin "laying face down in the grass," according to a police report."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/26/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html


If the powder burns were visible with Martin in this position, wouldn't that seem to indicate he was shot in the back? Did I miss something?

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One thing that's not clear about this supposed new photo of Zimmerman (Original Post) shawn703 Apr 2012 OP
I wondered the same thing peacebird Apr 2012 #1
I'll hazard a guess lacrew Apr 2012 #2
Although the photographer says Martin was in the prostrate position according to the article shawn703 Apr 2012 #5
Yes, NOW Zimmy has claimed thru poppy, that he didnt think T dead enough, so he lunged, and flipped WingDinger Apr 2012 #11
Yep tularetom Apr 2012 #12
I would have used "prostrate" for both positions -- totally forgot about "supine". nt gateley Apr 2012 #14
Yes. Trayvon was found laying facedown. n/t vaberella Apr 2012 #29
The EMS people seemed to think it was a frontal chest wound Warpy Apr 2012 #3
It may have been shawn703 Apr 2012 #13
The ME will corroborate one or the other as to the placement Warpy Apr 2012 #26
What does the autopsy state? Rex Apr 2012 #4
That's not out yet sakabatou Apr 2012 #8
It's not been released yet. Fawke Em Apr 2012 #9
Exactly. See my post below quoting Prosecutor's affidavit of charges, referencing shot in chest.... Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #28
When I first saw the picture of the back asjr Apr 2012 #6
CPR.... AzWorker Apr 2012 #7
The article looks like it is saying the powder burns were visible while Martin was in the prostrate shawn703 Apr 2012 #10
Are you saying he was shot in the back? AzWorker Apr 2012 #15
Nope not saying that at all shawn703 Apr 2012 #17
rest assured... AzWorker Apr 2012 #18
Very good point. nt Quixote1818 Apr 2012 #16
The evidence so far is that he was shot in the chest. That's a done deal. Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #19
Photographer's account not factually possible then? shawn703 Apr 2012 #20
Where on his body he was shot is a simple medical fact. Here you go: Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #27
The police reports said the boy was found laying on his face with is feet to the cement. vaberella Apr 2012 #30
Repeat: The Medical Examiner says he was shot in the chest. The Funeral Director said he was shot in Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #37
He was shot in the chest. vaberella Apr 2012 #31
Police Report Attached...laying down with hands under body cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #21
Exactly shawn703 Apr 2012 #22
I think relying on the use of the term 'prostrate' to refute the claim..... AzWorker Apr 2012 #23
Inadequate reporting then in that case shawn703 Apr 2012 #24
"inadequate reporting" seems to be the norm in this case... AzWorker Apr 2012 #25
I just don't trust any professional element in this case. vaberella Apr 2012 #32
Or it could just be sylvi Apr 2012 #33
And neither did the reporter or editor of the story for that matter shawn703 Apr 2012 #34
How do we know it's Zimmerman's head? n/t malaise Apr 2012 #35
We don't shawn703 Apr 2012 #36

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
5. Although the photographer says Martin was in the prostrate position according to the article
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:56 PM
Apr 2012

Doesn't that usually mean "face down"?

 

WingDinger

(3,690 posts)
11. Yes, NOW Zimmy has claimed thru poppy, that he didnt think T dead enough, so he lunged, and flipped
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:02 PM
Apr 2012

and mounted him. So many ad hoc embellishments after the fact.

Warpy

(111,237 posts)
3. The EMS people seemed to think it was a frontal chest wound
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:53 PM
Apr 2012

which is consistent with how he fell. People are blown backward by gunshot wounds only on Hollywood sound stages. They crumple forward in real life.

The same would happen with the entrance wound in the back instead of the front, but we don't have that information from the ME.

In fact, we don't know a lot except Zimmerman disobeyed a police dispatcher, left his vehicle to run after Martin, and shot him.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
13. It may have been
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:05 PM
Apr 2012

And if it was, wouldn't it call into question the integrity of this "anonymous photographer" who claims he saw Martin on the ground in the prostrate position and powder burns were clearly visible on his hoodie?

Warpy

(111,237 posts)
26. The ME will corroborate one or the other as to the placement
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:54 PM
Apr 2012

of entrance and exit wounds. I do find it unlikely that powder burns would be particularly noticeable on a blood soaked hoodie.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. What does the autopsy state?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:54 PM
Apr 2012

There can be really no doubt as to where the bullet entered and left the body.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
28. Exactly. See my post below quoting Prosecutor's affidavit of charges, referencing shot in chest....
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:21 PM
Apr 2012

See article attached to the affidavit stating that the information came from the Medical Examiner or autopsy or whatever.

One gunshot to the chest, and that was the cause of death.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
6. When I first saw the picture of the back
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:58 PM
Apr 2012

of Z's head I thought it looked like someone had painted it with a red magic marker.

 

AzWorker

(186 posts)
7. CPR....
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 03:59 PM
Apr 2012

IIRC the initial report indicated that the responding officers attempted to render aid to Martin, that would likely require him to be repositioned.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
10. The article looks like it is saying the powder burns were visible while Martin was in the prostrate
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:02 PM
Apr 2012

position. I made an edit to the post to bold that part too.

 

AzWorker

(186 posts)
15. Are you saying he was shot in the back?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 04:38 PM
Apr 2012

I'm pretty sure the State knows where the entrance wound was located, if it was in Martin's back we would have heard it by now...

8^)

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
17. Nope not saying that at all
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:00 PM
Apr 2012

But if this "anonymous photographer" is stating something that is not factually true, it would raise doubts about his claims, including those behind this supposed photograph.

 

AzWorker

(186 posts)
18. rest assured...
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:11 PM
Apr 2012

....that the responding officers and medical professionals will be asked about this and possibly other photographs, if any, taken at the scene.

I also suspect that the individual may be misusing the most commonly used definition of 'prostrate'.

8^)

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
19. The evidence so far is that he was shot in the chest. That's a done deal.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:15 PM
Apr 2012

It was mentioned at the bond hrg today, and before.

It comes from the Medical Examiner, I think.

This is a done deal. He was shot in the chest.

It'd be easy to see how someone shot in the chest, might turn around and try to get away, and then fall face down.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
20. Photographer's account not factually possible then?
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:24 PM
Apr 2012

Powder burns being visible on Martin's hoodie while he was in the prostrate position would then only seem possible if the photographer had x-ray vision.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
27. Where on his body he was shot is a simple medical fact. Here you go:
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:17 PM
Apr 2012
The affidavit ends by stating Martin was shot in the chest, and that Zimmerman admitted to the shooting of Martin. Assistant Medical Examiner Dr. Bao performed an autopsy on Martin and determined that Martin died from the gunshot wound

Continue reading on Examiner.com Charging document tries to fill in crucial minutes in Trayvon Martin case - National Political Buzz | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/article/charging-document-tries-to-fill-crucial-minutes-trayvon-martin-case#ixzz1sd5LDOVp


http://www.examiner.com/article/charging-document-tries-to-fill-crucial-minutes-trayvon-martin-case

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
30. The police reports said the boy was found laying on his face with is feet to the cement.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:35 PM
Apr 2012

Unless his body was moved post mortum the story leaves it undetermined whether the entry point was from the back or the front.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
37. Repeat: The Medical Examiner says he was shot in the chest. The Funeral Director said he was shot in
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 08:33 PM
Apr 2012

the chest.

Those are the types of reports that determine placement of wounds and cause of death. Not a photographer or police report saying how the body was lying

You're just not letting this sink in. Grass is green, a fair sky is blue, Martin was shot in the chest. There is no disagreement with this fact between the prosecution and defense.

Besides, I do not see the fact that a body is lying face down as indicative of being shot in the back. If you shoot someone in the chest, and he turns to run away, he would fall face down.

It's time to move on. Read my post above where I include a link to the prosecutor's legal charges filed with the court and an accompanying article.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
31. He was shot in the chest.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:37 PM
Apr 2012

The screams stopped abruptly. I can't see him doing a Bugs Bunny here before dieing face down or backwards as the case would be.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
22. Exactly
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:32 PM
Apr 2012

So if the photographer's account is that he saw Trayvon in the prostrate (face-down) position and that powder burns were clearly visible, there's a problem with his account.

 

AzWorker

(186 posts)
23. I think relying on the use of the term 'prostrate' to refute the claim.....
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:41 PM
Apr 2012

...is grasping at straws IMO.

Again, if no other pics exist from that night, the responding officers and medical can be asked about the pic and whether or not it accurately reflects what they saw at the scene.

It's really that simple.


Definition: (adj.) 1. lying down, often on one's face, either out of respect and submissiveness; 2. lying down in a horizontal position due to illness or lack of energy; 3. physically exhausted or emotionally overwhelmed; (v.) 1. to lie down or throw oneself on the ground, especially in a worshipful manner; 2. to exhaust, either physically or emotionally

Synonyms: (adj.) prone, flat, reclining, exhausted, spent, overwhelmed, (v.) grovel, bow, lay, exhaust, overcome

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
24. Inadequate reporting then in that case
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 05:59 PM
Apr 2012

That statement should have been followed up for clarification. Or the photographer may have said he took the photograph and saw Trayvon in the prostrate position, followed by seeing powder burns later after CPR was performed.

 

AzWorker

(186 posts)
25. "inadequate reporting" seems to be the norm in this case...
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 07:39 PM
Apr 2012

With the twaeking of audio and selective editing of 911 calls.....nothing suprises me with regards to this incident.

vaberella

(24,634 posts)
32. I just don't trust any professional element in this case.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:39 PM
Apr 2012

The cops are inept and I still have to figure out why the morgue wouldn't give the boys body back to his family right away.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
34. And neither did the reporter or editor of the story for that matter
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:02 AM
Apr 2012

Since there was no mention that the photographer's statement contradicts the known facts of the case.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
36. We don't
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 10:32 AM
Apr 2012

ABC News said this is a photo of Zimmerman's head. Not that it was allegedly a photo of Zimmerman's head. They reported this on the word of an unidentified photographer who gave a statement about the position of Trayvon's body and what was visible that is contradictory to the facts of the case. They didn't clarify the photographer's statement in case this photographer wasn't aware of the meaning of "prostrate", and they didn't say they confirmed this was a photo of Zimmerman by talking to the investigators in the case who saw Zimmerman's injuries. This is what's passing for reporting these days.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One thing that's not clea...