General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFlorida standarized science test really doesn't care their answers are wrong.
Just more "our students are failing so we need privatization of schools" grist from the Education Nation corporations...
http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/04/16/2119219/florida-thinks-their-students-are-too-stupid-to-know-the-right-answers
Points to this original blog post by happyscientist
http://thehappyscientist.com/blog/problems-floridas-science-fcat-test
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The gist of it after reading this sad, sad post:
A science teacher looked at the PRACTICE Florida high stakes science standards exam and found several questions where the correct answer was not "right." In another case, he found THREE scientifically correct answers but only one of course was "right."
Upon bringing up his concerns to the Florida Department of Education's Test Development Center, he was informed that it really doesn't matter because in their opinion fifth graders wouldn't know the correct answers anyway. In any case, while they agreed with him they saw no need to change anything.
The actual tests, of course, are not open to scrutiny but just another thing to think of as you hear that constant barrage about poor standards and failing schools.
The corporations themselves have little incentive to actually CARE what the right answers are.
elleng
(130,825 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,533 posts)or push through those hanging chads?
Not to mention electing morons like Jeb Bush and sticking the nation with his brother, dumber-than-dirt George W.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Schools. Everywhere, especially Florida.
Holy shit.
elleng
(130,825 posts)What's a future grandmother to do???
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I've discovered that there are sometimes good programs seemingly hidden within schools and districts or operated by counties or other agencies that have marvelous teachers.
And if that doesn't turn up anything, then look into charters or private schools, or even parochial if that fits.
But don't ever settle for less or wait around for meaningful reform, your grandchildren cannot wait!
Take care!
elleng
(130,825 posts)and daughters went to both private and parochial, but don't know what they'll be able to afford. Both daughters VERY aware, as they're natural teachers and younger actually studied SPED; not finishing her degree, but teaching and sitting for friends and neighbors now as she's aware of awfulness of curricula and dealing with administrations.
NOT WAITING for reform; won't happen, imo. Have to find the right places, MD and NJ.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)In other words, fundies..
Do you think their science education is going to be either thorough or rigorous?
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Leave no stone unturned.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I know Florida pretty well though, among other things my daughter was born there..
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)We have a selection of 6 answers:
no
obama did it
i'm not racist
guns don't kill people
because the bible says so
obama hates white people
saras
(6,670 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 17, 2012, 12:44 AM - Edit history (1)
WTF is with people who will TOLERATE this in their kids' schools?
The tests ARE open to scrutiny because SOMEONE needs to be scarfing copies and releasing them to the public.
EDIT: ACK!!! It's even WORSE than I thought. They're not HARD questions, they are questions that the real world expects fourth and fifth graders to know.
The geology question - when I learned WAY back in elementary school, we had a glass scratch plate and a ceramic color streak plate side by side. Just a couple of years ago, in a college geology class (the real one for majors, not the general university one) had the same two plates side by side (with a few other identity aids).
It's not even a 'trick' question that makes you think - it's just deliberately designed to produce half wrong answers out for no wrong answers in.
1 The petals of red roses are softer than the petals of yellow roses.
2 The song of a mockingbird is prettier than the song of a cardinal.
3 Orange blossoms give off a sweeter smell than gardenia flowers.
4 Sunflowers with larger petals attract more bees than sunflowers with smaller petals.
Hardness - testable
Prettier - not testable
Sweeter - chemical, hard, maybe, maybe not, because a 'sweet' smell is partly subjective.
Quantity - testable
Another question obviously designed to produce wrong answers for the statistics, no matter how good the kids are. All his examples are like that. They're not incompetent questions. In "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman", there's a chapter called Judging Books By Their Covers where he talks about trying to review math and science books. He has a lot of examples of incompetent questions, or, as he says, "Everything was written by somebody who didn't know what the hell he was talking about, so it was a little bit wrong, always!" But never questions that guaranteed a high proportion of wrong answers regardless of the quality of the student.
The other interesting thing about these bogus tests is that
A. the only possible way for a school to get good grades is to cheat - to have the right answers to study for
B. because of this, even a small amount of cheating is easily visible - only to those who can do statistics on the dataset.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Pertinent answers, one dollar.
Correct answers, ten dollars.
Now if you're a corporate executive obliged to maximize shareholder value, which answers are you going to pick?
Keep in mind that probably only one person in a hundred will even notice the difference..
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Would that be gluon exchange that binds quarks into subatomic particles?
Kid are supposed to know this?
Liberty Belle
(9,533 posts)and make the bastards pay to redo all those phony tests.
Public protest is effective too. Organize parents with protest signs to dog school administrators and Florida Education officials everyplace they go.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,294 posts)An excuse made by the official was
OK, they may not get taught about a gas chromatograph by 5th grade; but all they have to do is see a TV program (wouldn't need to be high-brow, either - "The Science Behind CSI" would do it) and they'll have heard of a GC. No, they cannot assume a child saw a TV show; but they must not assume all children have never seen TV shows. Or find such stuff on the web. Or, God forbid, read a book.
There's actually a basic failure of logic by that official; they shouldn't be in that job. They're not fit to help educate children.
Snake Alchemist
(3,318 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)Apparently, it took a long and determined campaign of misinformation and statistical lying....