Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(111,944 posts)
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 03:07 AM Oct 2014

Lockheed, Pentagon reach agreement on new F-35 contract

Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon announced a deal Monday on a production contract for the next batch of F-35 fighter jets, which is projected to lower the price per plane by 3.6 percent.

The contract, expected to be finalized in the next several weeks, would cover 43 F-35 aircraft including 29 for the U.S. military, the first two for Israel, the first four for Japan, four for the United Kingdom and two each for Norway and Italy.

Deliveries from what is known as “Low-Rate Initial Production lot 8” would begin in 2016. The Pentagon said cost details will be released later, but sources told Reuters last week that it is worth about $4 billion.

In a statement, Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan, the top Pentagon official over the F-35, said the agreement represents the program’s “ongoing maturation.”

Read more: http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/10/27/6235225/lockheed-pentagon-reach-agreement.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lockheed, Pentagon reach agreement on new F-35 contract (Original Post) TexasTowelie Oct 2014 OP
Not bad, guys! Turbineguy Oct 2014 #1
Yay a 3.6 percent less expensive Man from Pickens Oct 2014 #2
Hasn't the F-35 proven to be a failure? sakabatou Oct 2014 #3
Nope IDemo Oct 2014 #5
A pallet here and a pallet there and pretty soon you're talking real money! :) - nt KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #9
ugh - Jack of all trades, master of none Baclava Oct 2014 #4
I'll never understand the designer who thought Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #8
The Navy wants out Baclava Oct 2014 #10
I'd imagine they would all want out if they could... Blue_Tires Oct 2014 #11
Come on down to Crazy Chris Bogdan's for our Low, low rate initial production lot 8! gratuitous Oct 2014 #6
... n2doc Oct 2014 #7
Are they expecting another massive attack by Mighty Grenada? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2014 #12
So we save 3.6 percent on each useless hunk of junk? KamaAina Oct 2014 #13
 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
2. Yay a 3.6 percent less expensive
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 04:16 AM
Oct 2014

completely useless piece of shit that was obsolete before the first one rolled off the production line

wot a deal

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
8. I'll never understand the designer who thought
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:32 AM
Oct 2014

trying to shoehorn ONE aircraft to fit all the niche needs of the Navy/USMC/USAF was ever a good idea...

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
10. The Navy wants out
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:50 AM
Oct 2014
The Navy has requested a three-year pause in acquisition of the F-35C—the carrier-launched variant of the Joint Strike Fighter.

Unfortunately, the Office of the Secretary of Defense has reportedly blocked the Navy’s proposed break in procurement and is insisting that the service continue with previously planned purchases.

This proposal by the Navy to slow acquisition of the F-35 is welcome news to the Project On Government Oversight, which has been raising concerns with the Joint Strike Fighter program for a number of years. POGO, along with Taxpayers for Common Sense, has recommended that the Navy and Marine Corps end procurement of the F-35 and instead purchase additional F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.

And, of course, the Air Force should also terminate procurement of its variant of the F-35 and replace it with lifetime extensions of and upgrades to F-16s, F-15s, and A-10s. All three models of the F-35, not just the Navy and Marine Corps versions, are unaffordable and unacceptable in terms of their performance.

The F-35 has been plagued by development problems, cost overruns, and delays that have left it almost a decade behind schedule. The F/A-18E/F on the other hand is fully operational and can fulfill the Navy’s performance needs for strike aircraft for the foreseeable future. While the F-35C’s aircraft carrier suitability is a matter of some controversy, as was expressed in the recent report by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the F/A-18E/F has proven its carrier suitability.

The Super Hornet costs far less to procure with a price of around $65 million each compared to as much as $299.5 million per F-35C. The Super Hornet also costs significantly less to operate and maintain than the F-35, which is officially predicted to cost $1.1 trillion to sustain over its entire lifetime.

http://www.pogo.org/blog/2014/02/navy-looking-for-some-f-35-relief.html

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
11. I'd imagine they would all want out if they could...
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 02:51 PM
Oct 2014

The Lightning II is a dog...Wasn't even fun to use in Battlefield 3

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Come on down to Crazy Chris Bogdan's for our Low, low rate initial production lot 8!
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 09:03 AM
Oct 2014

Prices so low, we can't advertise them on the air! It's our wheelin'-est, dealin'-est days, but it ends soon! Israel, Japan, and the United Kingdom can't all be wrong. How many can we put you down for? What will it take to get you to drive this baby off the lot?

It's Crazy Chris Bogdan's! 1400 Defense Pentagon in DC! As always, free balloons and hot dogs for the kiddies, and a free camo wallet with every test drive! Come on down!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lockheed, Pentagon reach ...